REVIEW article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neuro-Otology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1644120
This article is part of the Research TopicNew Methods in Neuro-otology: Vestibular TestingView all 4 articles
The neural basis of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs). The cVEMP is a specific indicator of saccularfunction.
Provisionally accepted- 1The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- 2Universitatsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- 3MSA ENT Academy Center, Cassino, Italy
- 4Nagoya City University Gratuate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
- 5University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 6Universitat Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
- 7Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
VEMPs are widely used clinical vestibular tests and their interpretation is derived from the original proposal by Colebatch that the cVEMP is due to saccular activation by air conducted sound (ACS). This was based on previous extensive evidence that sounds selectively activate saccular afferent neurons and not semicircular canal neurons at clinical testing conditions. We revisit that earlier data and the results since. Despite that evidence, a recent partial review of the neural basis of cVEMPs has raised the possibility that canal afferents may be activated at clinical test frequencies and intensities and contribute to VEMPs, which would weaken their clinical specificity. This possibility is largely based on evidence that ACS clicks activate canal afferents in the rat – but not in the guinea pig. We show that result from the rat study is due to the very high sound pressure levels used - intensities which were far higher than those in the guinea pig study. When ACS stimuli of comparable intensity are used for both species at comparable clinically effective frequencies and intensities (~110dB SPL), otolithic neurons are activated in both species but canal activation by ACS clicks is negligible (and so most probably in humans also). Furthermore, the evidence from lesion and electrical stimulation studies and human clinical data complements the neural evidence and confirms the cVEMP to ACS is a specific test of saccular function. Audibility curves show rats have very high thresholds for frequencies most commonly used for human VEMP testing (500-1000Hz). That result questions the applicability of results of sound evoked vestibular responses from rat for understanding human vestibular function. Conclusion. There is a range of stimulus intensities and frequencies appropriate for measuring VEMPs. Using stimulus values within this range, neural evidence from rats and guinea pigs shows minimal contribution of canal afferents, meaning that VEMPs are specific tests of otolith function and that any contribution from semicircular canals to human cVEMPs (tones at 500Hz, clicks at 100 dB nHL) is negligible. Using stimulus values outside that range will stimulate semicircular canal afferents as well as otolith afferents, thus compromising the otolithic specificity of VEMPs.
Keywords: vemp, rat, guinea pig, otolith, utricular, semicircular canal
Received: 09 Jun 2025; Accepted: 11 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Curthoys, Fröhlich, McGarvie, Manzari, Iwasaki, Dlugaiczyk and Halmagyi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ian S Curthoys, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.