Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Stroke

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1644281

This article is part of the Research TopicNeurosonology in StrokeView all 9 articles

Ultrasonographic Assessment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter on the Affected and Unaffected Sides as a Predictor of Clinical Deterioration at Discharge in Patients with Large Hemispheric Infarction

Provisionally accepted
Changlan  LiChanglan LiWei  WangWei Wang*Yanping  LiYanping LiXunhu  GuXunhu GuYancai  ZhangYancai ZhangXiaoqian  ChengXiaoqian Cheng
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background and Objectives: Progressive cerebral edema worsens prognosis in large hemispheric infarction (LHI). Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement provides a non-invasive method for estimating intracranial pressure. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of affected- and unaffected-side ONSD for clinical deterioration at discharge in LHI patients and to provide reference data on factors linked to deterioration, follow-up outcomes, and longitudinal ONSD monitoring. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 35 LHI patients, classified into two groups: improved and deteriorated, based on clinical and imaging findings at discharge. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated the predictive performance of affected- and unaffected-side ONSD. Area under the curve (AUC) difference was compared using the DeLong test. Post-discharge follow-up at 30 and 90 days was conducted via telephone interviews. Longitudinal changes in affected- and unaffected-side ONSD were depicted using line graphs for patients with extended stays in the neuro-intensive care unit (NICU). Results: Statistically significant variables included age (P = 0.002), female (P = 0.002), history of atrial fibrillation (P = 0.044), GCS score (P = 0.028), affected-side ONSD (P = 0.002), unaffected-side ONSD (P = 0.012), and duration of NICU stay (P = 0.002). A positive linear correlation was identified between ONSD values and discharge outcomes. The optimal cut-off for predicting deterioration was 5.54 mm for affected-side ONSD (sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 78.9%, AUC = 0.814) versus 5.57mm for the unaffected-side (68.8%, 78.9%, AUC = 0.757), with no significant AUC difference between sides. The overall 30-day post-discharge mortality was 39.29%. Longitudinal changes in bilateral ONSD showed remarkable overlap in both individual and group observations. Patients with improved outcomes exhibited decreasing ONSD trends, whereas those with deterioration displayed increasing trends. Conclusion: Preoperative ONSD measurement is a feasible and practical predictor of discharge prognosis in LHI patients, with both affected and unaffected sides providing reliable monitoring. Factors including age, female, history of atrial fibrillation, GCS score, ONSD on either side, and NICU stay duration may influence outcomes. The high short-term mortality underscores the importance of the post-discharge transition management. The clinical value of longitudinal ONSD monitoring requires further investigation.

Keywords: Large hemispheric infarction, Intracranial Pressure, ultrasound, optic nerve sheath diameter, prognosis

Received: 10 Jun 2025; Accepted: 26 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Wang, Li, Gu, Zhang and Cheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Wei Wang, wuhansy@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.