Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurol., 11 September 2025

Sec. Neurocritical and Neurohospitalist Care

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1645028

Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in postoperative patients with cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yue GaoYue Gao1Xiaoyuan SunXiaoyuan Sun2Guozhong Wang
Guozhong Wang1*
  • 1Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China

Background: Surgical management of intracranial aneurysms frequently results in postoperative neurological impairments and diminished quality of life. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) has emerged as a potential adjunctive treatment to enhance neurological recovery and functional outcomes; however, its effectiveness remains debated.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of HBOT on clinical outcomes, neurological improvement, functional independence, and health-related quality of life in postoperative intracranial aneurysm patients.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HBOT combined with routine postoperative care versus routine care alone were identified through comprehensive database searches of PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP up to April 2025. Data were analyzed using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. Risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated as summary measures.

Results: A total of 11 RCTs, encompassing 2,268 patients, were analyzed. HBOT significantly improved clinical treatment efficacy (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.11–1.28, p < 0.00001) and neurological function (SMD = −0.63, 95% CI: −0.78 to −0.48, p < 0.00001). Functional independence also improved markedly, demonstrated by higher scores in Activities of Daily Living (ADL; SMD = 1.24), Barthel Index (SMD = 1.00), and SF-36 total scores (SMD = 1.32). All outcomes showed statistically significant improvements with minimal heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results.

Conclusion: Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy significantly enhances neurological recovery, functional outcomes, and overall quality of life in patients following intracranial aneurysm surgery. These results advocate for the clinical adoption of HBOT; nevertheless, additional high-quality, multicenter studies are necessary to confirm sustained long-term effects.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251086811.

1 Introduction

Cerebral aneurysms, characterized by focal dilatations of intracranial arteries, represent a potentially fatal vascular disorder due to their propensity to rupture, often resulting in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (1, 2). SAH accounts for a substantial proportion of hemorrhagic strokes and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly in cases involving ruptured aneurysms (3). To mitigate the risk of rebleeding and improve long-term neurological prognosis, surgical interventions such as microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling are routinely employed. Despite the efficacy of these techniques in excluding aneurysms from the cerebral circulation, postoperative outcomes are frequently compromised by a range of complications, including cerebral vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), hydrocephalus, and cognitive impairment (4, 5). These sequelae not only prolong hospitalization and rehabilitation but also impose significant burdens on patients, families, and healthcare systems.

Considering these challenges, there has been increasing interest in identifying adjunctive therapeutic modalities that can enhance cerebral perfusion, limit secondary neuronal injury, and ultimately improve functional recovery. Among these, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has emerged as a promising candidate. HBOT involves the inhalation of 100% oxygen under elevated atmospheric pressure, typically within a sealed hyperbaric chamber (68). This therapeutic approach is hypothesized to exert multiple neuroprotective effects, including increased oxygen delivery to hypoxic brain tissue, attenuation of cerebral edema, reduction of oxidative stress, and modulation of neuroinflammatory pathways (9). Moreover, HBOT has been reported to promote angiogenesis and neurogenesis, thereby potentially facilitating tissue repair and functional restoration in injured brain regions.

While the neurophysiological rationale for HBOT is well-supported by experimental data and its efficacy has been explored in several neurological conditions, most notably ischemic stroke and traumatic brain injuries, its clinical utility in the context of postoperative management of cerebral aneurysms remains inadequately defined. A limited number of studies have investigated the role of HBOT in this population, with some suggesting potential improvements in neurological function, reduction in vasospasm incidence, and enhanced recovery (10). However, the existing body of literature is marked by heterogeneity in study design, patient populations, HBOT protocols, and outcome measures, which have hindered the derivation of definitive conclusions. Furthermore, the absence of a comprehensive and methodologically rigorous synthesis of available evidence underscores the need for further investigation.

Therefore, the present study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients undergoing surgical treatment for cerebral aneurysms through a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant clinical studies. By integrating data across multiple studies, this analysis seeks to quantify the impact of HBOT on key clinical outcomes, including neurological function, postoperative complications, and overall recovery trajectories. The findings of this review are intended to inform clinical decision-making and provide a foundation for future research into optimizing perioperative care in patients with cerebral aneurysms.

2 Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A structured approach was adopted to ensure methodological rigor in the identification, selection, evaluation, and synthesis of relevant clinical studies on the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients following surgical treatment for cerebral aneurysms.

2.1 Eligibility criteria

Studies were included in this review based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible studies comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, retrospective observational studies, and case–control studies that evaluated the effects of HBOT in postoperative patients with cerebral aneurysms. Participants were required to be adult patients (aged 18 years or older) who had undergone surgical treatment for intracranial aneurysms, including microsurgical clipping or endovascular coiling. The intervention of interest was hyperbaric oxygen therapy, defined as the administration of 100% oxygen at a pressure greater than atmospheric pressure (usually >1.4 ATA), delivered in a hyperbaric chamber. The comparison group consisted of patients who received standard postoperative care with or without sham therapy, but without exposure to HBOT. Eligible studies were required to report at least one relevant clinical outcome. Studies were excluded if they were case reports, narrative reviews, editorials, animal or in vitro studies, or lacked a control group.

2.2 Information sources

A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases was conducted to identify all relevant studies published up to 15 May 2025. The databases searched included PubMed, Web of Science, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang and VIP Data. To enhance completeness, we also manually reviewed the reference lists of all included articles and relevant reviews to identify additional eligible studies.

2.3 Search strategy

The search strategy was designed to maximize sensitivity and specificity by combining both medical subject headings (MeSH) and free-text keywords related to cerebral aneurysms, surgical intervention, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Boolean operators (“AND,” “OR”) were used to link search terms, and the strategy was customized for each database. An example of the PubMed search string was: (“cerebral aneurysm” OR “intracranial aneurysm”) AND (“surgery” OR “clipping” OR “coiling”) AND (“hyperbaric oxygen” OR “HBOT”). Searches were limited to human studies published in English or Chinese.

2.4 Study selection process

All identified records were imported into EndNote X9 (Clarivate Analytics) for de-duplication. Two independent reviewers conducted an initial screening of titles and abstracts to exclude studies that clearly did not meet inclusion criteria. The full texts of potentially eligible studies were then retrieved and assessed independently by the same reviewers. Disagreements regarding inclusion were resolved through discussion, and a third reviewer was consulted in cases of persistent disagreement. The study selection process was documented in a PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Forest plot comparing experimental and control groups across three studies. Each study shows the standard mean difference with 95% confidence intervals, represented as horizontal lines with green squares. The overall effect is shown as a diamond, indicating a standardized mean difference of 1.24, favoring the experimental group. Heterogeneity is low with I² = 0%.

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.

2.5 Data extraction and management

Data from included studies were extracted independently by two reviewers using a predesigned, standardized data extraction form created in Microsoft Excel. The extracted information included the following: first author, year of publication, country, study design, sample size, patient characteristics (age and sex), follow-up duration and outcomes. Discrepancies in data extraction were resolved through discussion, with involvement of a third reviewer when necessary.

2.6 Risk of bias assessment

The methodological quality of each included study was assessed independently by two reviewers. For randomized controlled trials, the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 1.0) was used to evaluate bias across five domains: the randomization process, deviations from intended interventions, missing outcome data, measurement of the outcome, and selection of the reported result.

2.7 Data synthesis and statistical analysis

Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes reported by at least two studies using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.4). For dichotomous outcomes, risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. For continuous outcomes, standardized mean differences (SMDs) were used, depending on the consistency of measurement scales across studies. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the chi-square (Q) test and quantified with the I2 statistic. And I2 value above 50% was considered indicative of substantial heterogeneity. A random-effects model was applied in the presence of moderate to high heterogeneity; otherwise, a fixed-effect model was used. Sensitivity analyses were performed sequentially excluding individual studies to assess the stability of the pooled estimates.

3 Results

3.1 Study selection

A total of 450 records were initially retrieved from six electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP. After removing 39 duplicate records, 411 articles remained for screening. After reading the titles and abstracts, 363 articles were excluded due to irrelevance. The remaining 48 articles were sought for full-text retrieval. One study was excluded because the full text was unavailable. A total of 47 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Among these, 34 were excluded because hyperbaric oxygen therapy was combined with other interventions, and 3 were excluded due to insufficient extractable data. Finally, 11 studies (1121) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis.

3.2 Study characteristics

A total of 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis, with publication years ranging from 2007 to 2025. The total sample size was 1,132 patients in the experimental group and 1,136 in the control group. All included studies were conducted in China and focused on the clinical efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy following surgery for intracranial aneurysms. Detailed study characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies in the meta-analysis.

3.3 Risk of bias within studies

The risk of bias in the included randomized controlled trials was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, as shown in Figures 2, 3. Most studies had a low risk of bias for random sequence generation. However, allocation concealment and blinding of participants and personnel frequently showed unclear or high risk, indicating potential selection and performance bias. About half of the studies had unclear or high risk for blinding of outcome assessment, suggesting possible detection bias. In contrast, most studies showed a low risk for incomplete outcome data and selective reporting, reflecting generally adequate data quality. Overall, the methodological quality was moderate, with limited reporting on allocation and blinding procedures in several studies.

Figure 2
Forest plot showing three studies comparing experimental and control groups. Each study's standardized mean differences and confidence intervals are displayed. The overall effect size is 1.00 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.83 to 1.17. Heterogeneity is indicated as Chi-squared 1.22, degrees of freedom 2, P-value 0.54, with an I-squared of 0%. Overall test effect shows Z-score 11.76, P-value less than 0.00001. The plot favors the experimental group.

Figure 2. Summary of risk of bias for each domain across all included studies.

Figure 3
Forest plot showing the standardized mean difference between experimental and control groups across three studies. Each study's result is a green square with a horizontal line indicating the confidence interval. The diamond at the bottom represents the overall effect size, favoring the experimental group with a standardized mean difference of 1.32 and a confidence interval of 1.16 to 1.49. Heterogeneity is low with I² = 0%.

Figure 3. Risk of bias assessment for each included study.

3.4 Synthesis of results

3.4.1 Treatment effectiveness rate

A total of four studies reported data on treatment effectiveness rate. The pooled analysis showed that the HBO group had a significantly higher effectiveness rate compared to the control group, with a combined RR of 1.19 (95% CI: 1.11–1.28, p < 0.00001), indicating a 19% improvement in treatment response. There was no significant heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 0%, p = 0.96), so a fixed-effects model was used (Figure 4). These results suggest that HBO therapy significantly improves clinical outcomes in postoperative patients with intracranial aneurysms.

Figure 4
Forest plot depicting four studies comparing experimental and control groups. Standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals are shown. All results favor the experimental group, with an overall mean difference of -0.63. Heterogeneity is low, with Chi-squared at 0.48 and I-squared at 0 percent. Total sample size is 362 for both groups.

Figure 4. Forest plot of treatment effectiveness rate comparing hyperbaric oxygen therapy with control.

3.4.2 Neurological function deficit (NFD)

Four studies reported data on NFD scores. A fixed-effects model was applied due to low heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 0%, p = 0.92). The pooled SMD was −0.63 (95% CI: −0.78 to −0.48, p < 0.00001) (Figure 5), indicating a statistically significant improvement in neurological function in the hyperbaric oxygen therapy group compared to the control group. These results suggest that HBO therapy is effective in reducing neurological deficits after surgery for intracranial aneurysms.

Figure 5
Forest plot showing a meta-analysis of four studies comparing experimental and control groups. The risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals are: Hou 2020: 1.22 [1.08, 1.38]; Kuang 2007: 1.17 [1.03, 1.33]; Xu 2017: 1.17 [0.97, 1.42]; Yu 2018: 1.20 [1.03, 1.39]. The overall effect size is 1.19 [1.11, 1.28] with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%). All studies favor the experimental group.

Figure 5. Forest plot of neurological function deficit (NFD) scores comparing hyperbaric oxygen therapy with control.

3.4.3 Activities of daily living (ADL) score

Three studies reported ADL scores. A fixed-effects model was used due to low heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.65). The pooled SMD was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.03–1.46, p < 0.00001) (Figure 6), indicating that hyperbaric oxygen therapy significantly improved patients’ functional independence compared to the control group. These results demonstrate that HBO therapy can effectively enhance the postoperative activities of daily life in patients with intracranial aneurysms.

Figure 6
Bar chart displaying bias risks in different categories: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete data, selective reporting, and other bias. Green indicates low risk, yellow uncertain risk, and red high risk, with varying proportions.

Figure 6. Forest plot of ADL scores comparing hyperbaric oxygen therapy with control.

3.4.4 Barthel Index

Three studies reported Barthel Index scores to assess daily living ability. Due to the absence of heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.54), a fixed-effects model was applied. The pooled SMD was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.83–1.17, p < 0.00001) (Figure 7), indicating a significant improvement in functional independence in the hyperbaric oxygen therapy group compared to the control group. These findings suggest that hyperbaric oxygen therapy effectively enhances postoperative self-care ability in patients with intracranial aneurysms.

Figure 7
A risk of bias summary figure for various studies. Rows represent different studies, and columns display categories of bias such as selection and reporting bias. Green circles with plus signs indicate low risk, red with minus signs indicate high risk, and yellow with question marks indicate unclear risk. Each study's individual biases are assessed across several parameters.

Figure 7. Forest plot of Barthel Index scores comparing hyperbaric oxygen therapy with control.

3.4.5 SF-36 total score

Three studies reported SF-36 total scores to assess overall quality of life. A fixed-effects model was used due to no heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%, p = 1.00). The pooled SMD was 1.32 (95% CI, 1.16–1.49, p < 0.00001) (Figure 8), indicating a significant improvement in health-related quality of life in the hyperbaric oxygen therapy group compared to the control group. These findings suggest that HBO therapy significantly enhances postoperative quality of life in patients with intracranial aneurysms.

Figure 8
Flowchart depicting the identification, screening, and inclusion process of studies via databases. Initially, 450 records are identified, with 39 duplicates removed. After screening 411 records, 363 are excluded. Of 48 reports sought for retrieval, 1 is unavailable. 47 reports assessed for eligibility lead to 37 exclusions. Finally, 11 studies are included.

Figure 8. Forest plot of SF-36 total scores comparing hyperbaric oxygen therapy with control.

3.5 Sensitivity analysis

To assess the robustness of the meta-analysis results, sensitivity analysis was conducted by sequentially removing each included study and reanalyzing the pooled estimates. The results showed that the overall effect sizes did not change substantially after excluding any single study, indicating that the findings are stable and not overly influenced by any individual study. In addition, the use of fixed- and random-effects models yielded consistent results, further supporting the reliability of the analysis.

4 Discussion

This meta-analysis provides comprehensive evidence on the clinical benefits of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial aneurysms. By synthesizing data from 11 randomized controlled trials, we found that HBOT significantly improves a range of postoperative outcomes, including treatment response, neurological function, functional independence, and health-related quality of life.

The pooled analysis showed that HBOT is associated with a significantly higher treatment effectiveness rate compared to conventional care. This finding suggests that the addition of HBOT may enhance postoperative recovery, possibly by improving oxygen delivery to the brain and accelerating the resolution of ischemia-induced tissue damage. Moreover, neurological function, as assessed by standardized deficit scores, was markedly better in the HBOT group (1214), indicating that oxygen therapy may play a key role in neural repair processes following aneurysmal surgery. Functional status, measured through ADL and Barthel Index scores, also favored the HBOT group. These results are clinically meaningful, as they demonstrate improved self-care and daily function—critical components of patient recovery and reintegration into normal life (15, 16). In addition, quality-of-life outcomes assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire revealed significant improvements in patients receiving HBOT, emphasizing the broader physical and psychological benefits of this intervention.

Increased partial pressure of oxygen facilitates oxygen diffusion into hypoxic tissue, supports mitochondrial function, and improves cellular metabolism (22). HBOT has also been shown to reduce cerebral edema, suppress inflammation, modulate oxidative stress, and promote angiogenesis and neurogenesis—all of which contribute to better neurological and functional outcomes after brain injury or surgery (13, 23). These mechanisms provide a strong physiological basis for the observed clinical benefits. Importantly, the results of this analysis demonstrated high consistency across studies, with low statistical heterogeneity for all outcomes. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the pooled estimates were stable and not significantly influenced by any single study, which enhances confidence in the robustness of the findings. The convergence of effect sizes across multiple domain clinical efficacy, function, and quality of life—further reinforces the reliability of the evidence.

Despite these strengths, several limitations warrant consideration. The methodological quality of the included studies was moderate; although randomization was reported in all trials, details regarding allocation concealment and blinding were often insufficient or unclear, raising potential concerns of selection and performance bias. Additionally, all studies were conducted in China, which may limit generalizability to other healthcare settings, populations, or ethnic groups. Sample sizes in some trials were relatively small, and most studies only reported short-term outcomes, making it difficult to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of HBOT in this context. Furthermore, variations in outcome measurement tools—especially for functional and quality-of-life indices—may introduce reporting variability, even though statistical heterogeneity remained low. Future research should address these limitations by conducting large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials with rigorous methodology, standardized outcome measures, and extended follow-up periods. It would also be valuable to explore cost-effectiveness, safety profiles, and patient-centered outcomes to better inform clinical practice and policy decisions.

5 Conclusion

In summary, this meta-analysis supports the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an effective adjunct to standard postoperative management in patients with intracranial aneurysms. HBOT appears to enhance neurological recovery, functional rehabilitation, and quality of life without introducing significant heterogeneity or instability in the evidence. These findings provide a strong rationale for integrating HBOT into perioperative care protocols, although further high-quality studies are needed to confirm and extend these results.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

YG: Writing – original draft, Data curation, Methodology, Conceptualization, Resources. XS: Validation, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. GW: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Project administration.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Xu, Z, Rui, YN, Hagan, JP, and Kim, DH. Intracranial aneurysms: pathology, genetics, and molecular mechanisms. NeuroMolecular Med. (2019) 21:325–43. doi: 10.1007/s12017-019-08537-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Turan, N, Heider, RA, Zaharieva, D, Ahmad, FU, Barrow, DL, and Pradilla, G. Sex differences in the formation of intracranial aneurysms and incidence and outcome of subarachnoid hemorrhage: review of experimental and human studies. Transl Stroke Res. (2016) 7:12–9. doi: 10.1007/s12975-015-0434-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lepine, HL, Semione, G, Llata, FM, Nogueira, BV, Pereira, A, Coelho, DN, et al. Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with parent artery flow diverter devices: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. (2025) 20:524–39. doi: 10.1177/17474930241307114

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Vandenbulcke, A, Messerer, M, Daniel, RT, and Cossu, G. The role of cisternostomy and cisternal drainage in the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a comprehensive review. Brain Sci. (2023) 13:1580. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13111580

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Karnati, T, Binyamin, TR, Dahlin, BC, and Waldau, B. Ruptured fisher grade 3 blister aneurysms have a higher incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia than ruptured fisher grade 3 saccular aneurysms. Brain Circ. (2020) 6:116–22. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_63_19

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Resanović, I, Zarić, B, Radovanović, J, Sudar-Milovanović, E, Gluvić, Z, Jevremović, D, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and vascular complications in diabetes mellitus. Angiology. (2020) 71:876–85. doi: 10.1177/0003319720936925

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Bosco, G, Brizzolari, A, Paganini, M, Camporesi, E, Vezzoli, A, and Mrakic-Sposta, S. Oxy-inflammation in hyperbaric oxygen therapy applications. Eur J Transl Myol. (2025) 35:12783. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.12783

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Sethuraman, KN, Smolin, R, and Henry, S. Is there a place for hyperbaric oxygen therapy? Adv Surg. (2022) 56:169–204. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2022.02.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Li, Y, Guan, Y, Wang, Y, Yu, CL, Zhai, FG, and Guan, LX. Neuroprotective effect of the Ginsenoside Rg1 on cerebral ischemic injury in vivo and in vitro is mediated by PPARγ-regulated Antioxidative and anti-inflammatory pathways. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2017) 2017:7842082. doi: 10.1155/2017/7842082

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Bin-Alamer, O, Abou-Al-Shaar, H, Efrati, S, Hadanny, A, Beckman, RL, Elamir, M, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as a neuromodulatory technique: a review of the recent evidence. Front Neurol. (2024) 15:1450134. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1450134

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chen, X. The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on the survival ability and quality of life of patients after cerebral aneurysm surgery. Zhejiang Clin Med. (2012) 14:3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7664.2012.11.017

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Cui, X. Effect of early hyperbaric oxygen technology on rehabilitation of brain function after intracranial aneurysm surgery. Chin Med Eng. (2025) 33:61–5. doi: 10.19338/j.issn.1672-2019.2025.01.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hou, S. Effect of hyperbaric oxygen on postoperative rehabilitation of brain tumors and cerebral aneurysms. Reflexology Rehabil Med. (2020) 3, 10–12.

Google Scholar

14. Jiang, K. Observation of postoperative rehabititation effecacy of hyperbaric oxygen on brain tumors, cerebral aneurysms. China Med Pharm Sci. (2014):208–10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2014.15.072

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kuang, A, and Gou, M. Observation on the therapeutic effect of hyperbaric oxygen on postoperative rehabilitation of brain tumor and cerebral aneurysm patients. J Ningxia Med Univ. (2007) 29:514–5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6309.2007.05.031

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Ma, Y. Analysis of clinical effect of hyperbaric oxygen on postoperative rehabilitation of brain tumors and cerebral aneurysms. Chin J Mod Drug Appl. (2022) 16, 42–44. doi: 10.14164/j.cnki.cn11-5581/r.2022.12.011

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Xiao, H, Wu, Q, Zou, J, Yu, J, Liu, D, and Guo, Q. Observation on the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in treating cerebral edema after intracranial aneurysm surgery. J Pract Med. (2014) 30, 3884–3885. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2014.23.066

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Xu, W. Clinical efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients after surgery for brain tumors and cerebral aneurysms. Chin J Pract Nerv Dis. (2017) 20, 61–62.

Google Scholar

19. Yu, H, Liu, Z, and Qang, X. Evaluation of postoperative rehabilitation of hyperbaric oxygenation for brain tumors and cerebral aneurysm. Chin J Clin Oncol Rehabil. (2018) 25:4

Google Scholar

20. Yu, Y. Study on the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on the survival ability and quality of life of patients after cerebral aneurysm surgery. Prac J Cardiac Cereb Pneumal Vas Dis. (2013) 21:2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5971.2013.03.028

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Zang, X, Xiang, X, Cai, N, Yu, X, Maimaijiang, A, and Yimamu, Y. Impact of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on motor function and quality of life in patients with cerebral aneurysms. Prac J Cardiac Cereb Pneumal Vas Dis. (2017) 10:129–30.

Google Scholar

22. Timper, K, Paeger, L, Sánchez-Lasheras, C, Varela, L, Jais, A, Nolte, H, et al. Mild impairment of mitochondrial OXPHOS promotes fatty acid utilization in POMC neurons and improves glucose homeostasis in obesity. Cell Rep. (2018) 25:383–397.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Thiankhaw, K, Chattipakorn, N, and Chattipakorn, SC. The effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on the brain with middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Cell Physiol. (2021) 236:1677–94. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29955

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: intracranial aneurysm, postoperative recovery, neurological function, meta-analysis, hyperbaric oxygen therapy

Citation: Gao Y, Sun X and Wang G (2025) Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in postoperative patients with cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 16:1645028. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1645028

Received: 12 June 2025; Accepted: 12 August 2025;
Published: 11 September 2025.

Edited by:

Weili Li, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences (SDAMS), China

Reviewed by:

Joseph Maroon, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States
Jarosław Pasek, Jan Długosz University, Poland

Copyright © 2025 Gao, Sun and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guozhong Wang, Z3p1b29uZzU1NjVAb3V0bG9vay5jb20=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.