SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurocritical and Neurohospitalist Care
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1645397
This article is part of the Research TopicPrecision Medicine in Neurocritical CareView all 9 articles
Diagnostic Models for Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted
- 1School of nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
- 2The First Hospital of Jilin University Department of Emergency Medicine, Changchun, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To systematically evaluate the performance and methodological rigor of published prediction models for sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE), identify their limitations, and provide guidance for the future development of robust and clinically applicable models.Methods: We conducted a systematic search across nine English and Chinese databases (from inception to May 2025) for studies developing or validating SAE prediction models in adult sepsis patients. Two researchers independently gathered data, using PROBAST to assess methodological quality, and conducted a meta-analysis of the AUC of logistic regression models.Results: Ten studies were included, encompassing 55,244 patients with sepsis, revealing an incidence of SAE ranging from 15.0% to 62.4%. A total of 29 predictive models were developed, comprising 10 optimal models, primarily utilizing logistic regression or machine learning algorithms. The combined AUC of the five logistic regression models was 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.93), exhibiting substantial heterogeneity (I²=91.8%). All models showed a high risk of bias according to the PROBAST evaluation, mainly due to the lack of external validation and methodological shortcomings.Conclusion: Current SAE prediction models demonstrate moderate discriminatory ability, but their methodological quality remains poor, and they are not yet suitable for routine clinical application. In the future, standardized SAE definitions and prospective data collection should be strengthened, models should be developed and validated strictly following the TRIPOD guidelines, and model interpretability should be improved to promote clinical application.
Keywords: sepsis-associated encephalopathy, prediction, Model, Systematic review, Meta-analysis
Received: 11 Jun 2025; Accepted: 16 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhou, Tian, Wang and Chu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Zhe Chu, The First Hospital of Jilin University Department of Emergency Medicine, Changchun, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.