Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Epilepsy

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1645435

Assessment of Benzodiazepine Dosing in Status Epilepticus Patients in the Emergency Department

Provisionally accepted
Raniah  Ibrahim AljadeedRaniah Ibrahim Aljadeed1*Amenah  AlkafAmenah Alkaf2Daad  AlhajlbrahimDaad Alhajlbrahim3Huda  AlewairdhiHuda Alewairdhi1Ghadah  Asaad AssiriGhadah Asaad Assiri1Rana  AljadeedRana Aljadeed1Haya  AlmalaqHaya Almalaq1Dr. Nora  KalagiDr. Nora Kalagi1
  • 1King Saud University College of Pharmacy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 2Aster Sanad Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 3Hikma Pharmaceuticals KSA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract Background: Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical emergency that requires immediate care and is associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. Current guidelines recommend benzodiazepines (BZDs), regardless of the type of SE, as an initial treatment. Despite established guidelines, BZD underdosing remains common in clinical practice. This study aimed to the objective of this study was to assess BZD doses in patients administered to the ED with SE and evaluate patient outcomes in relation to BZD dosing adequacy. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of adult patients (≥18 years) who presented to the ED with SE and received BZDs from January 2021 to January 2024. Primary outcome was percent of SE patients admitted to our institution who received inadequate doses of BZDs. Secondary outcomes included ICU admission rates, need for endotracheal intubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at discharge administration of second-line antiseizure medications, and in-hospital mortality. Demographic data, treatment details, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results: Among 196 adult patients included, only 17% (n=34) received an adequate first dose of BZDs. Pre-hospital BZD administration occurred in 5% of cases. Lorazepam was most frequently administered (65%), followed by midazolam (20%) and diazepam (15%). Inadequate dosing rates were 77.2% for lorazepam, 90.0% for midazolam, and 96.6% for diazepam. Following first dose of BZE, the overall need for endotracheal intubation rate was 8.7% and in-hospital mortality at 3.1% across the entire cohort, with no significant differences between the 2 groups(p=0.166; p=0.279). The overall need for endotracheal intubation rate was 8.9%, with no statistically significant difference observed between the groups (p=0.167). For patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the mean duration was 4 days (p=0.988). Notably, inadequate total BZD dosing was significantly associated with increased in-hospital mortality (4.2% vs. 0%, p=0.010). Conclusion: BZD underdosing in SE management remains widespread, with only 17% of patients receiving guideline-adherent initial doses. Although our study did not demonstrate significant differences in clinical outcomes based on dosing adequacy, implementation of institution-specific protocols and focused educational initiatives on weight-based BZD administration may improve guideline adherence in SE management.

Keywords: Status epileptics, emergency deparment, seizure, Benzodiazepines, Lorazepam

Received: 11 Jun 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Aljadeed, Alkaf, Alhajlbrahim, Alewairdhi, Assiri, Aljadeed, Almalaq and Kalagi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Raniah Ibrahim Aljadeed, King Saud University College of Pharmacy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.