ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurorehabilitation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1648616
This article is part of the Research TopicNeurorehabilitative and regenerative methods involved in treating traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries: Volume IIView all 6 articles
Exploring the feasibility of combining transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation and overground robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation in patients with spinal cord injury
Provisionally accepted- 1BioRobotics Group, Centre for Automation and Robotics (CAR) CSIC-UPM, Arganda del Rey, Madrid, Spain
- 2E.T.S. Ingenieros de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- 3Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO). Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
- 4Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO). Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), Toledo, Spain
- 5Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Biomechanics and Sensorimotor Function (HNP-SESCAM). Associated Unit of R&D&I to the CSIC, Madrid, Spain
- 6Neural Engineering Lab, Cajal Institute (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
- 7Biomechanical and Technical Aids Unit, National Hospital for Paraplegics, Toledo, Spain
- 8Unit of Neurorehabiliation, Biomechanics and Sensorimotor Function (HNP-SESCAM). Associated Unit of R&D&I to the CSIC, Madrid, Spain
- 9Biomechanics and Technical Aids Unit, National Hospital for Paraplegics, Toledo, Spain
- 10Bioengineering Systems and Technologies Research Group (BeST). Rey Juan Carlos University, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
- 11Unit of Neurorehabilitation, Biomechanics and Sensorimotor Function (HNP-SESCAM), Associated Unit of R&D&I to the CSIC, Madrid, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a traumatic condition that causes severe sensory and mobility impairments, including gait dysfunction. Combining exoskeleton-assisted gait training (EGT) with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) may enhance motor recovery in SCI patients. This study explores the feasibility and immediate effects of combining these two neurorehabilitation strategies, without pursuing clinical benefits. Methods: We present a 3-of-1 case series of incomplete SCI patients (AIS C-D) who participated in two walking sessions: tSCS-assisted gait, then combined with the robotic exoskeleton Exo-H3. Each session included three phases of 3 minutes each: before, during and after tSCS. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded to analyze muscle activation and the level of effort generated using root mean square (RMS) and integrated EMG (iEMG). Functional outcomes were assessed with the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for discomfort and fatigue and distance covered. Results: Immediate effects varied among patients. Participant 1 showed increased muscle activation and effort without the Exo-H3 after tSCS, particularly in the Rectus Femoris (ReFe) muscle, along with improved TUG performance and walking speed. However, during the combined tSCS-Exo session, muscle activation did not decrease, but effort was significantly reduced, masking the tSCS effects seen without the exoskeleton. Walking speed and TUG also worsened. Participant 2 exhibited reduced RMS and iEMG in both conditions, especially in the ReFe, with no notable improvement in TUG score or distance covered. In contrast, Participant 3 appeared to benefit from both sessions, showing increased activation and exertion in the tibialis anterior and upper leg (biceps femoris and ReFe). TUG did not improve in the non-exoskeleton session after tSCS but showed significant improvement when combined with Exo-H3. None of the participants reported abnormal discomfort or fatigue beyond the levels typically associated with exoskeleton use. Discussion: The combined use of tSCS and EGT appears technically feasible and safe, whereas the responses were highly individualized. Knee extensors muscles showed the greatest responsiveness to tSCS during gait. Synergistic effects may depend on the user's proficiency with the exoskeleton. Further analysis and larger studies are needed to better identify SCI who may benefit the most.
Keywords: exoskeleton, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, spinal cord injury, Electromyography, Locomotion rehabilitation, non-invasive neuromodulation
Received: 17 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Algaba Vidoy, Pérez Nombela, Megía Carpintero, Montero-Pardo, Redondo Galán, De Los Reyes-Guzmán, Serrano Muñoz, Gómez-Soriano, del-Ama and Moreno. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Juan Camilo Moreno, BioRobotics Group, Centre for Automation and Robotics (CAR) CSIC-UPM, Arganda del Rey, Madrid, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.