REVIEW article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurorehabilitation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1648841
Best Evidence Summary on Positioning Management in Stroke Patients
Provisionally accepted- 1Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China
- 2Shenzhen Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shenzhen, China
- 3Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
- 4Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine School of Nursing, Guangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the world, characterized by high morbidity, high mortality, high disability and high recurrence rates, which brings a heavy burden to families and society. The implementation of positioning management for stroke patients can effectively improve their clinical outcomes and quality of life; however, the current evidence related to stroke is fragmented, which is not conducive to its utilization by clinical healthcare professionals. Objective: A systematic retrieval, critical appraisal, and synthesis of evidence on positioning management strategies for stroke patients were conducted to establish an evidence-based foundation for clinical decision-making in neurological rehabilitation. Methods: Based on the "6S" evidence resource pyramid, a top-down search strategy was employed, searching relevant databases and guideline websites ,including the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Institute of Health and Care Excellencethe, American Heart Association, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, CNKl, VIP, the WanFang database, China Biology Medicine, UpToDate, Chinese Medical Association, the Yi Maitong Guidelines Network, Dingxiangyuan.The search period covered February 2015 to February 2025. Two reviewers independently screened and critically assessed the literature, and then extracted and synthesized the evidence by grading it according to the Joanna BriggsInstitute Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care Evidence Pre-grading System, Australia. Results: A total of 9605 publications were retrieved, resulting in the inclusion of 12 publications, including 9 clinical guidelines, 1 clinical decision support tool, 1 systematic review, and 1 expert consensuses. The evidence was synthesized into 7 thematic areas: team composition, comprehensive assessment, head-of-bed elevation angle, body positioning Strategies , early mobilization, assistive devices, and clinical considerations. resulting in 37 evidence-based practice recommendations. Conclusion: This study summarizes the best evidence for positional management of stroke patients, which provides an evidence-based basis for standardizing stroke positional management. However, the best evidence should be used in an individualized manner with comprehensive consideration of the actual clinical situation when the evidence is applied in order to improve quality of life of stroke patients. In the future, it should also be combined with multi-sample and multi-center studies to validate its effect.
Keywords: Stroke, Position, Evidence-Based Nursing, summary of evidence, Management
Received: 04 Jul 2025; Accepted: 15 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xiong, Pan, Chai, Lei, Peng, Hu, Li, Liang, Kuang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yongqi Liang, 13342817226@163.com
Lingyu Kuang, 410030752@qq.com
Hanjiao Liu, liuhanjiao000@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.