Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1654656

Evaluating the Impact of Task-Sequencing on Cognitive and Motor Performance in MS: PASAT and 3-Minute Walk Test Order Effects

Provisionally accepted
Valentin  SiegertValentin Siegert1,2*Laura  Jane KöhlerLaura Jane Köhler1,2Lucas  SchreffLucas Schreff2Daniel  HamacherDaniel Hamacher3Patrick  OschmannPatrick Oschmann1,2Veit  RothhammerVeit Rothhammer1Philipp  Moritz KeunePhilipp Moritz Keune2,4Roy  MüllerRoy Müller1,2,5
  • 1University of Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • 2Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany
  • 3Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena, Jena, Germany
  • 4Otto-Friedrich-Universitat Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
  • 5Universitat Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Cognitive-motor functioning in persons with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) may be studied effectively by means of dual-task paradigms, under which potential impairments may become more salient. However, the influence of task sequencing, i.e., the order in which a cognitive or motor task is administered prior to the dual-task condition remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate potential task-sequencing effects, as reflected in fatigue or learning effects across single- and dual-task conditions. Methods: A total of 152 PwMS with an average EDSS of 2.3 were quasi-randomly assigned to six groups. The groups differed in the sequence in which a single-motor-task (3-min-25-foot-walk) and a single-cognitive-task (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, PASAT)) as well as a dual-task combining both were administered. Gait parameters were measured using an IMU sensor. Statistical analyses compared single- and dual-task performance depending on task-sequencing. Results: Task-sequencing did not affect cognitive or motor performance during the dual-task condition. However, a significant improvement in PASAT scores was observed between the first and second single-task trials, indicating a learning effect. No significant fatigue effects were found in gait parameters between repeated single-task trials. Discussion: The findings suggest that the sequence of task administration does not significantly influence dual-task performance in the subgroup of PwMS focused on in the current work. Merely repeated single-task use of the PASAT leads to cognitive performance improvements, likely due to learning effects. These results indicate that, in clinical settings, test order may be of minor importance for dual-task conditions, if administered according to the procedure used in the current work.

Keywords: multiple sclerosis (MS), 25-foot walk, Inertial sensors, Cognition, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)

Received: 26 Jun 2025; Accepted: 31 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Siegert, Köhler, Schreff, Hamacher, Oschmann, Rothhammer, Keune and Müller. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Valentin Siegert, University of Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.