Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1659670

Rituximab retreatment guided by CD27+ B-cell count versus clinical relapse in anti-MAG polyneuropathy: a cost-effective approach with lower cumulative doses

Provisionally accepted
Margherita  BellucciMargherita Bellucci1Giovanna  CapodiventoGiovanna Capodivento2Federico  MassaFederico Massa1Federica  Maria BozzanoFederica Maria Bozzano2Giacomo  BavestrelloGiacomo Bavestrello1Elena  BaroncelliElena Baroncelli1Corrado  CabonaCorrado Cabona3Antonia  CagnettaAntonia Cagnetta4Angelo  SchenoneAngelo Schenone1Lucilla  NobbioLucilla Nobbio2Luana  BenedettiLuana Benedetti5*
  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, and Mother-Child, School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
  • 2IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
  • 3Division of Clinical Neurophysiology and Epilepsy Center, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
  • 4Department of Hematology, Universita degli Studi di Genova Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialita Mediche, Genoa, Italy
  • 5Department of Neurology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction. Rituximab (RTX) is a widely used treatment for anti-MAG polyneuropathy, though standardized maintenance strategies are lacking. We aimed to compare two RTX retreatment protocols: (1) a full course (375 mg/m²/week for 4 weeks) administered at clinical relapse, and (2) a single infusion (375 mg/m²) at reappearance of peripheral CD27+ B cells-to evaluate their impact on disability progression over time.Patients and methods. We retrospectively enrolled 29 patients with anti-MAG polyneuropathy, dividing them into two cohorts: 1) relapse (n=19), treated with a full course at clinical relapse, or 2) Kim's protocol (n=10), treated based on peripheral CD27+ B cell monitoring. Changes in INCAT, MRC sum score, and ISS from baseline to last follow-up were assessed.. No significant changes in MRC scores were observed in either cohort. Both cohorts showed a significant reduction in INCAT scores at last follow-up, with a tendency toward greater improvement in Kim's protocol cohort. ISS scores were significantly lower in Kim's protocol cohort compared to the relapse cohort (p < 0.01). Importantly, patients treated according to Kim's protocol received a cumulative RTX dose approximately 2.5 times lower than those treated upon relapse (p < 0.0001), despite showing comparable or better clinical outcomes.A tailored maintenance strategy guided by peripheral CD27+ memory B-cell monitoring enables reduced cumulative RTX exposure while preserving clinical efficacy. This approach may improve cost-effectiveness and reduce treatment burden in patients with anti-MAG polyneuropathy.

Keywords: Anti-MAG polyneuropathy, rituximab maintenance therapy, B-cell depletion, chronic inflammatory neuropathy treatment protocols, CD27 B cells monitoring

Received: 04 Jul 2025; Accepted: 28 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bellucci, Capodivento, Massa, Bozzano, Bavestrello, Baroncelli, Cabona, Cagnetta, Schenone, Nobbio and Benedetti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Luana Benedetti, Department of Neurology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.