Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Neuro-Otology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1660108

Comparison of simultaneous bilateral CI surgery versus sequential CI surgery regarding operative time, perioperative morbidity and anesthesia risk in children

Provisionally accepted
Leonie  FriesLeonie Fries*Friederike  EveradFriederike EveradRainer  Linus BeckRainer Linus BeckAntje  AschendorffAntje AschendorffSusan  ArndtSusan ArndtManuel Christoph  KettererManuel Christoph Ketterer
  • Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

In recent years, simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) has become the preferred procedure for children with bilateral deafness. The aim of this study is to compare simultaneous bilateral implantation with sequential bilateral CI concerning duration of surgery and anesthesia, perioperative morbidity, mortality, and anesthesia risk.A retrospective data analysis was conducted on 132 children who were implanted between 2019 and 2024 and aged under 10 years at the time of either simultaneous or second CI. The age at implantation, duration of surgery and anesthesia, anesthesia risk, perioperative morbidity and mortality were compared between the simultaneous and the sequential implantation cohorts.Simultaneous bilateral CI demonstrated a significant reduced duration of anesthesia in total for both sides (simultaneous CI: 221.7 +/-41.4 min; sequential CI: 262.3 +/-37.11 min, p < 0.0001) and a significant shorter duration of surgery with a mean of 108.6 minutes (+/-38.2 min) for both sides in simultaneous CI and 132.7 minutes (+/-36.85 min) for sequential CI (p < 0.0001). However, perioperative morbidity and mortality as well as anesthesia risk showed no significant differences. The cumulative duration of hospitalization was significantly longer for sequential CI (simultaneous CI: 5 +/-0.76 days; sequential CI: 10 +/-0.85 days).The study underlines the benefits of simultaneous bilateral CI, regarded as the gold standard, particularly concerning reduced duration of surgery and anesthesia time. In an era of healthcare cost efficiency, simultaneous CI also enables shorter hospital stays. However, the absence of significant differences in perioperative morbidity, mortality, and anesthesia risks must be considered. This makes sequential CI a viable treatment alternative and allows for an individualized treatment approach that accounts for existing comorbidities and individual patient and parental factors.

Keywords: Bilateral cochlear implant, Bilateral CI, Sequential cochlear implantation, simultaneous cochlear implantation, Cochlear implantation in children

Received: 05 Jul 2025; Accepted: 23 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Fries, Everad, Beck, Aschendorff, Arndt and Ketterer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Leonie Fries, leonie.fries@uniklinik-freiburg.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.