You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

CORRECTION article

Front. Neurol., 10 November 2025

Sec. Neuroepidemiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1667648

Correction: Effect of body mass index on survival after spinal cord injury

  • 1. Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • 2. Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • 3. Department of Orthopaedics, Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • 4. International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • 5. Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Clinical and Experimental Spinal Cord Injury Research, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

  • 6. QUEST-Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany

  • 7. Department of Neurology, Spinal Cord Injury Division, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States

  • 8. Belford Center for Spinal Cord Injury, Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States

Article metrics

View details

631

Views

55

Downloads

The caption of Figure 2B appears below.

“Linearized cumulative survival over time illustrated a protective effect of a higher BMI in a class (dose) dependent manner which occurs early and is long-lasting. Whereas, elevated mortality was observed in patients who were severely underweight (< 17.5 kg/m2, red, n = 12), patients with a BMI of 17.5–30.5 kg/m2 (green, n = 578) or >30.5 kg/m2 (blue, n = 53) were protected mirrored by a less negative slope that nearly plateaus after 3 years.”

There was a mistake in Figure 2B as published. The colors in the figure did not match the corresponding BMI categories in the legend. The corrected Figure 2B, appears below.

Figure 2B

Survival curve graph showing cumulative survival over time after spinal cord injury (SCI) in days. Blue line represents BMI above 30.5 (n=53), green line for BMI between 17.5 and 30.5 (n=578), and red line for BMI below 17.5 (n=12). The red line shows the lowest survival rate, followed by the green, and the highest by the blue.

There was a mistake in Supplementary Figure 2 as published. The colors of the lines on the graph did not match the corresponding BMI categories in the legend and caption.

The corrected Supplementary Figure 2, appears below.

Supplementary Figure 2

Line graph showing cumulative survival over time after SCI in days. Four BMI categories are compared: over 30 (purple), 25-29.9 (beige), 18.5-24.9 (green), and under 18.5 (blue). The purple line is the highest, indicating the best survival, while the blue line is the lowest, indicating the poorest survival.

The original version of this article has been updated.

Statements

Generative AI statement

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

acute spinal cord injury, body mass index, mortality risk, Charlson comorbidity index, injury severity score

Citation

Fallah N, Noonan VK, Thorogood NP, Kwon BK, Kopp MA and Schwab JM (2025) Correction: Effect of body mass index on survival after spinal cord injury. Front. Neurol. 16:1667648. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1667648

Received

16 July 2025

Accepted

02 October 2025

Published

10 November 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited and reviewed by

Alberto Cliquet Junior, State University of Campinas, Brazil

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Jan M. Schwab,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics