Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Stroke

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1669778

This article is part of the Research TopicUnderstanding the No-Reflow Phenomenon in Acute Ischemic StrokeView all articles

Effects of Manual Carotid Compression in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Anterior Circulation Large-vessel Occlusion: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matching Study

Provisionally accepted
  • Department of stroke center, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Randomized controlled trials suggested that balloon guide catheters for proximal flow control (PFC) in endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (LVO) have unsatisfactory results. Our study aimed to explore effects of manual carotid compression (MCC) achieving temporary PFC in EVT, without interfering with endovascular procedures. Methods: We retrospectively included 203 patients with acute occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery or the M1 or proximal M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery undergoing EVT from three independent centers (n=80 in the MCC group and n=123 in the non-MCC group). The primary outcome was the 90-day functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score≤2. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to compare outcomes. Results: In the overall cohort, the median age was 71 years (IQR 62-76), with 119 male patients (58.6%). Baseline characteristics between the two groups differed significantly in terms of hypertension (p=0.017), previous stroke/TIA (p=0.01), pre-stroke mRS (p=0.003), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NHISS) score(p=0.004), left occlusion (p<0.001), and transfemoral access (p=0.009). After adjusting for baseline characteristics using PSM, 34 matched pairs were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the 90-day functional independence between the two groups (44.1% vs 32.4%, p=0.454). The MCC group showed significantly lower mRS scores at 90 days (p=0.031), with a higher proportion of patients scoring 0-1 (41.2% vs 8.8%, p=0.005). MCC significantly increased the first pass effect (FPE) rate (55.9% vs 23.5%,p=0.013) and the rate of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥ 2b after the first pass (70.6% vs 41.2%, p=0.028), and reduced NHISS scores at 24 hours after recanalization (p=0.002) and at 7 days or discharge (p<0.001). In terms of safety outcomes, MCC effectively reduced the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (14.7% vs 47.1%, p=0.009) and symptomatic ICH (sICH) (0% vs 17.6%, p=0.033). Conclusion:MCC in EVT for patients with acute anterior circulation LVO in our cohort could improve the 90-day mRS score and the proportion of patients with scores of 0-1, increase the reperfusion rate after the first pass and enhance early neurological improvement, while decreasing the incidence of ICH and sICH.

Keywords: manual carotid compression, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), Large-vessel occlusion (LVO), propensity scorematching (PSM), Acute ischemic stroke, Balloon Guide Catheter (BGC)

Received: 20 Jul 2025; Accepted: 16 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bao and He. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Shuang He, 67105704@qq.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.