ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurocritical and Neurohospitalist Care
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1673515
This article is part of the Research TopicBrain Cytoprotection for Reperfusion Injury after Acute Ischemic StrokeView all 9 articles
Impact of Emergency Nursing Interventions on Pre-Hospital and In-Hospital Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Provisionally accepted- Wuhan Fourth Hospital, Wuhan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, with clinical outcomes highly dependent on the timeliness and coordination of emergency care. Emergency nurses are at the frontline of acute stroke management, contributing significantly to early recognition, rapid triage, thrombolysis preparation, and prevention of in-hospital complications. However, the real-world impact of structured emergency nursing interventions on both pre-hospital and in-hospital stroke outcomes remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of emergency nursing interventions in reducing treatment delays and improving short-term neurological recovery in patients with AIS. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Wuhan Fourth Hospital, including 217 adult AIS patients admitted between January 2020 and April 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of structured emergency nursing protocols, including pre-hospital triage coordination, stroke code activation, focused neurological monitoring, and post-thrombolysis care. Primary endpoints included door-to-needle time (DNT), thrombolysis rate, and early neurological deterioration. Secondary outcomes were NIHSS score changes at 72 hours, hospital length of stay, and 7-day in-hospital mortality. Results: Patients receiving emergency nursing interventions (n = 107) had significantly shorter median DNT (42 vs. 56 minutes, p < 0.001), higher thrombolysis rates (71.0% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.004), and reduced early neurological deterioration (10.3% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.018). NIHSS improvement ≥4 points was more frequent in the intervention group (64.5% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.003). No significant difference in 7-day mortality was observed. Conclusion: The implementation of structured emergency nursing interventions in AIS care significantly improves treatment timeliness and short-term functional outcomes. These findings support the inclusion of specialized nursing protocols in emergency stroke pathways to enhance quality and efficiency of care.
Keywords: Acute ischemic stroke, Emergency Nursing, Stroke code activation, Door-to-needle time, pre-hospital care, neurological outcome, thrombolysis, Retrospective cohort
Received: 25 Aug 2025; Accepted: 10 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhan and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Chunyan Xu, xuchunyan202409@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.