Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Neurocritical and Neurohospitalist Care

Predicting prolonged mechanical ventilation after endovascular treatment for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion: AIRFLOW score

Provisionally accepted
Qiankun  CaiQiankun Cai1*Minying  HongMinying Hong2Yingjie  XuYingjie Xu3Shuai  ZhangShuai Zhang4Zhixin  HuangZhixin Huang5Pengfei  XuPengfei Xu3Chunnuan  ChenChunnuan Chen1Jixing  ChenJixing Chen1Ye  LichaoYe Lichao1Wen  SunWen Sun3*
  • 1Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
  • 2Department of General practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
  • 3Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
  • 4Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
  • 5Department of Neurology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background and purpose Vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) is a rare yet severe type of ischemic stroke, often leading to respiratory failure that necessitates invasive mechanical ventilation and is associated with high mortality rates. While endovascular treatment (EVT) has improved outcomes for VBAO, many patients still require prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) post-EVT, further increasing mortality and posing challenging decisions for families. Currently, no predictive model exists to identify VBAO patients at risk of needing PMV after EVT. This study aims to develop and validate a predictive score for PMV in this patient population following EVT. Materials and methods The derivation cohort prospectively recruited VBAO patients undergoing EVT from four comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) in China. PMV was defined as continuous mechanical ventilation lasting for ≥ 7 days. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to develop a scoring system. The performance of the model was evaluated for discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. 414 patients from acute Posterior circulation ischemic Stroke registry were enrolled to externally validate the model. Sensitivity analysis redefined PMV as using mechanical ventilation last for ≥ 14 days to further validate the model. Results The derivation cohort consisted of 419 patients from four CSCs, among whom 113 (27.0%) required PMV. The presence of malignant cerebellar edema, posterior circulation collateral status, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage post-EVT, atrial fibrillation, intravenous thrombolysis, vasopressor therapy and Glasgow coma score classification are found to be independent predictors of PMV in logistic regression, then 'AIRFLOW' scoring system was created. The AIRFLOW score demonstrated good discrimination in derivation cohort (C-index, 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.89), as well as the validation cohort (C-index, 0.82, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.86). Calibration plots and decision curve analysis for AIRFLOW score indicated that the model accurately predicted the risk of PMV and had satisfactory net benefit across various thresholds. Similar results were found in sensitivity analysis. Conclusions The AIRFLOW score may help predict PMV in VBAO patients after EVT.

Keywords: mechanical ventilation, Vertebrobasilar artery, endovascular treatment, predictors, Stroke

Received: 15 Aug 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Cai, Hong, Xu, Zhang, Huang, Xu, Chen, Chen, Lichao and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Qiankun Cai, caiqiankun@126.com
Wen Sun, sunwen_medneuro@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.