STUDY PROTOCOL article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Endovascular and Interventional Neurology
PREVENT: Towards the Prevention of Intracranial Vessel Perforations During Mechanical Thrombectomy – Protocol for a Multicenter Registry Study
Provisionally accepted- 1Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- 2Universitatsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- 3Universitat Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- 4University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- 5Inselspital Universitatsspital Bern Universitatsklinik fur Neurologie, Bern, Switzerland
- 6Universitat Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Rationale: The increasing use of thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke highlights the need to better understand its complications. Vessel perforation leading to active intracranial bleeding is a severe complication, associated with poor outcome and a mortality of approximately 50%. The etiology and risk factors for this severe complication remain largely unknown, and there is limited evidence to guide decision-making regarding endovascular hemostatic strategies and the continuation of thrombectomy after perforation. Design: The Perforation EVents during ENdovascular Therapy for acute ischemic stroke (PREVENT) – Registry is an international, multicenter, prospective and retrospective study collecting data on vessel perforations during thrombectomy. The registry aims to include 500 cases of vessel perforation and 500 matched controls without perforation. The collected data will consist of both tabulated data and periprocedural imaging, which is to be analyzed by a central imaging core laboratory. Data will be analyzed using case-control methods, with univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Objectives: The primary objectives are to (1) identify risk factors for vessel perforation, (2) explore the underlying pathophysiology, (3) develop a classification system for vessel perforations, (4) compare different hemostatic treatment strategies, (5) evaluate the impact of continuing versus aborting thrombectomy after perforation, and (6) propose a safety-optimized thrombectomy technique. Discussion: Given the frequence and hyperacute emergency of vessel perforations, a prospective randomized study is not feasible. This large, international registry provides a robust approach to gather real-world evidence, reducing bias through multicenter data 2 collection and case matching. The results may improve clinical decision-making and patient safety in thrombectomy procedures. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06394180.
Keywords: Stroke, Thrombectomy, complication, intracranial hemorrhage, multi center
Received: 05 Aug 2025; Accepted: 25 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Schulze-Zachau, Rommers, Muenger, Katan, Balmer, Haniotis, Brehm, Fischer and Psychogios. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Victor Schulze-Zachau
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
