Anna Zanotto
Catherine F. Siengsukon- Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science, and Athletic Training, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
1 Introduction
Sleep disturbances are a frequent concern among individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and are associated with negative health consequences (1). Insomnia is a common comorbidity in MS, with 22% of adults with MS being diagnosed with an insomnia disorder and 52% reporting poor sleep quality (2). Traditionally, sleep has been conceptualized on an individual level. Sleep is however often a shared health behavior, with 82% of adults in married or co-habiting relationships reporting sharing a bed with a significant other. Yet, very little is known about the reciprocal sleep dynamics between people with MS and their partners. In this opinion article, we discuss why addressing dyadic sleep in couples facing MS needs critical research attention. We propose that both academic and clinical communities incorporate the role of partners in sleep health intervention design and implementation.
2 Sleep disturbance in people with MS
Sleep quality is often negatively affected in people with MS (1). A recent meta-analysis of prevalence of insomnia in people with MS revealed that self-reported symptoms of poor sleep quality and daytime sleepiness are present in one out of two adults with MS, and 1 out of 5 is diagnosed with an insomnia disorder based on diagnostic criteria (2). To compare, insomnia symptoms with daytime impairment ranges between 10 and 15% in the general population (3). Potential explanations for such high prevalence in people with MS include MS-associated symptoms, such as pain or nocturia, immunotherapy, medications and their side effects, disease severity, and mood problems such as depression (4). Disturbed sleep can have severe health consequences for people with MS, for example contributing to fatigue, impaired cognitive function, reduced motivation or energy, and impaired social and occupational performance (5). There is also evidence for bidirectional relationships between sleep disturbances, fatigue, pain, and depression impacting on overall quality of life (6). We contend that including the role of partners in assessing and treating sleep problems in people with MS is essential for advancing a more comprehensive understanding of sleep disturbance and for informing interventions that adequately address the interpersonal dynamics.
3 Sleep as a shared behavior
Sleep has been traditionally studied as an individual phenomenon. Recently, however, there is an increased recognition of relationship factors and the impact of partners on sleep quality (7, 8). Growing research efforts shift the field of sleep study to include the role of partners and treat sleep as a dyadic and shared behavior (9, 10). Among general population, 61% of adults report sharing a bed with a significant other (10). In married or co-habiting couples, 82% report bed-sharing (11). While we do not yet have data on bed-sharing prevalence in a population of individuals with MS and their partner caregivers, emerging evidence from people with other chronic conditions such as cancer and dementia suggests that sleep of both partners in affected relationships is interrelated (12). Partners' habits, attachment styles, and mental health are associated with one's own sleep disturbance (7, 10, 13). Poor sleep in one partner predicted poorer psychological outcomes in the other, reinforcing the need to treat sleep within a relational context (14, 15). On the other hand, partners can also have a positive effect on one's sleep, including promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors (16), consistent social routines and behavioral activation during the day (17). Interventions that target both members of a dyad (e.g., cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) adapted for couples) have yielded promising results in patients with cancer and their sleep-partner caregivers, suggesting that supporting both partners may enhance treatment efficacy and adherence (18).
4 Sleep in partner caregivers of people with MS
While many individuals with MS are able to maintain independent lives, others require support. The term caregiver is used to describe an individual providing psychological and/or physical support for a person in need (19), with informal caregiving indicating unpaid support provided by family or friends. Informal care for people with MS is most commonly provided by their spouses, with estimates of spousal care ranging from 53 to 70% (20). Research on sleep quality in partner caregivers of people with MS is scarce with only a handful of studies to our knowledge identified as tackling the issue. For example, Argyriou et al. reported that in a Greek sample of caregivers of individuals with MS, 54.3% reported poor sleep quality (21). More recent evidence from the UK found that 72.1% of family members of people with MS reported an impact on sleep (22). Poor sleep is a common concern among family caregivers of individuals with chronic conditions (23), including spousal caregivers who provide dementia care who bedshare (24) and caregivers of patients with cancer (25). Between 40 and 76% of caregivers for patients with cancer report a clinically significant sleep disturbance, which represents higher rates than those reported among patients with cancer or the general population (26). This may be due to the unique responsibilities and stressors associated with caregiving. Sleep disturbances in caregivers have detrimental effects for their psychological and physical health (27), and may result in higher care burden which can ultimately negatively affect ability to provide care (23). Couples where one person has MS often engage in dyadic coping (meaning they depend on one another when facing illness-related stressors) (28, 29). While sleep has not to our knowledge yet been included as an aspect of research on dyadic coping, we argue that examining the dyadic nature of sleep in people with MS and their partners emerges as an important research avenue. We posit that disturbed sleep in partner caregivers is associated with negative health consequences for themselves as well as for the individuals with MS. Therefore, as individuals with MS are at an increased risk of sleep disturbance due to having MS, disturbed sleep of their partner may also compound the issue.
5 Future research directions
Despite a growing appreciation of dyadic sleep dynamics in health impact and care of people with chronic illness, research in the context of MS is in its infancy. Future research should measure sleep concordance in couples where one person has MS in order to determine the impact of potential reciprocity on other aspects of health such as fatigue or mood. There is also a lack of interventional studies targeting both members of the MS dyad. Adaptations of CBT-I that incorporate dyadic components have shown promise in other populations (18) and should be tested in MS. There is a need for longitudinal designs to examine the relationship between MS-related symptoms, caregiving stress, and sleep. Conceptually, more integration is needed between the fields of sleep medicine, neurology, and psychosocial caregiving. Importantly, the recent trends toward family-based care as opposed to solely patient-centered care in healthcare (30, 31) add further weight to our call of including the role of partners also in the context of addressing sleep problems of people with MS.
6 Discussion
To conclude, sleep disturbances in people with MS are prevalent and have serious implications for quality of life. As many people with MS cohabit with their partner caregivers, sleep should be studied and treated as a dyadic interpersonal behavior. The broader caregiving literature suggests that when caregivers suffer from sleep deprivation, their emotional regulation, physical health, and caregiving capacity deteriorate, which in turn can negatively impact patient outcomes. Emerging evidence from other chronic conditions points toward the need for a dyadic approach to sleep in MS care and research. We believe that expanding the evidence base in this direction holds potential to improve outcomes for both people with MS and their caregivers.
Author contributions
AZ: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. CS: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Moradi A, Ebrahimian A, Sadigh-Eteghad S, Talebi M, Naseri A. Sleep quality in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Mult Scler Relat Disord. (2025) 93:106219. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.106219
2. Zeng X, Dorstyn DS, Edwards G, Kneebone I. The prevalence of insomnia in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. (2023) 72:101842. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101842
3. Schutte-Rodin S, Broch L, Buysse D, Dorsey C, Sateia M. Clinical guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic insomnia in adults. J Clin Sleep Med. (2008) 4:487–504. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.27286
4. Brass SD, Duquette P, Proulx-Therrien J, Auerbach S. Sleep disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis. Sleep Med Rev. (2010) 14:121–9. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2009.07.005
5. Braley TJ, Boudreau EA. Sleep disorders in multiple sclerosis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. (2016) 16:50. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0649-2
6. Boe Lunde HM, Aae TF, Indrevag W, Aarseth J, Bjorvatn B, Myhr KM, et al. Poor sleep in patients with multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e49996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049996
7. Rogojanski J, Carney CE, Monson CM. Interpersonal factors in insomnia: a model for integrating bed partners into cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. Sleep Med Rev. (2013) 17:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2012.02.003
8. Wang XX, Lin Q, Liu X, Dong P, Bao Y, Que JY, et al. The association between couple relationships and sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. (2025) 79:102018. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102018
9. Troxel WM. It's more than sex: exploring the dyadic nature of sleep and implications for health. Psychosom Med. (2010) 72:578–86. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181de7ff8
10. Troxel WM, Robles TF, Hall M, Buysse DJ. Marital quality and the marital bed: examining the covariation between relationship quality and sleep. Sleep Med Rev. (2007) 11:389–404. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2007.05.002
11. Andre CJ, Lovallo V, Spencer RMC. The effects of bed sharing on sleep: from partners to pets. Sleep Health. (2021) 7:314–23. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2020.11.011
12. Kotronoulas G, Wengstrom Y, Kearney N. Sleep and sleep-wake disturbances in care recipient-caregiver dyads in the context of a chronic illness: a critical review of the literature. J Pain Symptom Manag. (2013) 45:579–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.03.013
13. Revenson TA, Marin-Chollom AM, Rundle AG, Wisnivesky J, Neugut AI. Hey Mr. Sandman: dyadic effects of anxiety, depressive symptoms and sleep among married couples. J Behav Med. (2016) 39:225–32. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9693-7
14. Chen JH. Couples' sleep and psychological distress: a dyadic perspective. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. (2017) 73:30–9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx001
15. Chen Q, Terhorst L, Lowery-Allison A, Cheng H, Tsung A, Layshock M, et al. Sleep problems in advanced cancer patients and their caregivers: who is disturbing whom? J Behav Med. (2020) 43:614–22. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00088-3
16. Fuller TD, Tech V. Relationship status, health, and health behavior: an examination of cohabiters and commuters. Sociol Perspect. (2010) 53:221–45. doi: 10.1525/sop.2010.53.2.221
17. Carney CE, Edinger JD, Meyer B, Lindman L, Istre T. Daily activities and sleep quality in college students. Chronobiol Int. (2006) 23:623–37. doi: 10.1080/07420520600650695
18. Kim Y, Ting A, Tsai TC, Carver CS. Dyadic sleep intervention for adult patients with cancer and their sleep-partner caregivers: a feasibility study. Palliat Support Care. (2024) 22:226–35. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000627
19. Sullivan AB, Miller D. Who is taking care of the caregiver? J Patient Exp. (2015) 2:7–12. doi: 10.1177/237437431500200103
20. Maguire R, Maguire P. Caregiver burden in multiple sclerosis: recent trends and future directions. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. (2020) 20:18. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-01043-5
21. Argyriou AA, Karanasios P, Assimakopoulos K, Iconomou G, Makridou A, Giannakopoulou F, et al. Assessing the quality of sleep in greek primary caregivers of patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study. J Pain Symptom Manage. (2011) 42:541–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.01.005
22. Shah R, Salek S, Ali FM, Otwombe K, Nixon SJ, Nixon M-E, et al. Multiple sclerosis greatly impacts family members/partners: evidence using the Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16). Multiple Scler J. (2025) 11:20552173251338762. doi: 10.1177/20552173251338762
23. Liu Y, Song Y, Johnson FU, Lei L, Choi SE, Antonucci TC, et al. Characteristics and predictors of sleep among spousal care dyads living with chronic conditions. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. (2023) 78:S38–47. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac096
24. Peng HL, Lorenz RA, Chang YP. Factors associated with sleep in family caregivers of individuals with dementia. Perspect Psychiatr Care. (2019) 55:95–102. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12307
25. Skalla KA, Smith EM Li Z, Gates C. Multidimensional needs of caregivers for patients with cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. (2013) 17:500–6. doi: 10.1188/13.CJON.17-05AP
26. Shaffer KM, Garland SN, Mao JJ, Applebaum AJ. Insomnia among cancer caregivers: a proposal for tailored cognitive behavioral therapy. J Psychother Integr. (2018) 28:275–91. doi: 10.1037/int0000105
27. Morris BA, Thorndike FP, Ritterband LM, Glozier N, Dunn J, Chambers SK. Sleep disturbance in cancer patients and caregivers who contact telephone-based help services. Support Care Cancer. (2015) 23:1113–20. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2458-y
28. Carberry S, Fortune DG. “Just be here”: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of couples' experiences of dyadic coping in multiple sclerosis. J Soc Pers Relat. (2025) 42:849–72. doi: 10.1177/02654075241309381
29. Carberry S, MacConaill S, Fortune DG. Couples' experiences of coping with Multiple Sclerosis: a qualitative systematic review and metasynthesis. Disabil Rehabil. (2025) 47:814–26. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2361804
30. Md Khalid N, Razali A, Sajali Zaidi NS, Razak NAA, Muhamad AS, Ahmad N, et al. Family-based interventions in improving caregivers' psychological-related outcomes: a systematic literature review. Chronic Illn. (2025) 2025:17423953251334123. doi: 10.1177/17423953251334123
Keywords: multiple sclerosis, sleep, partners, caregivers, dyadic coping
Citation: Zanotto A and Siengsukon CF (2025) Dyadic sleep in people with multiple sclerosis and their partners: current research and future directions. Front. Neurol. 16:1682411. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1682411
Received: 08 August 2025; Accepted: 30 September 2025;
Published: 15 October 2025.
Edited by:
Qing-Wei Chen, South China Normal University, ChinaReviewed by:
Rubina Shah, Cardiff University, United KingdomCopyright © 2025 Zanotto and Siengsukon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anna Zanotto, YXphbm90dG9Aa3VtYy5lZHU=