Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Movement Disorders

Levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone versus levodopa/benserazide plus pramipexole in Chinese patients with Parkinson’s disease experiencing wearing off

Provisionally accepted
Cuiyu  YuCuiyu Yu1Weiguo  LiuWeiguo Liu1*Aiping  GongAiping Gong2Min  YeMin Ye3Hui  HuangHui Huang4Yang  ZhaoYang Zhao5Chun-Feng  LiuChun-Feng Liu6Yijing  GuoYijing Guo7Juping  ChenJuping Chen8Xueling  ZhangXueling Zhang9Xianwen  ChenXianwen Chen10Lihua  ShenLihua Shen11Dan  LiDan Li12
  • 1Nanjing Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
  • 2The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
  • 3Nanjing BenQ Medical Center, Nanjing, China
  • 4Huaibei People's Hospital, Huaibei, China
  • 5Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
  • 6Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
  • 7Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
  • 8Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Changshu, China
  • 9The Affiliated Suqian Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian, China
  • 10The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
  • 11Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
  • 12Jiangsu Province (Suqian) Hospital, Suqian, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of direct switch from levodopa/benserazide (LB) to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) versus LB plus pramipexole (PPX) in Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing wearing off (WO). Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, observational study, 140 patients with PD experiencing WO who had been on stable LB treatment were enrolled and randomized 3:2 to receive LCE (84) or LB+PPX (56) treatment for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in the daily "OFF" time from baseline. Change in the daily "ON" time was also assessed. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded. Results: Seventy-nine patients in the LCE group and 49 patients in the PPX group completed the study. Both LCE and PPX shortened the patients' daily OFF time significantly after 8 weeks (- 1.76±1.70 hours, p<0.001 and -1.51±1.60, p<0.001, respectively), and the shortenings were comparable between the two groups (p=0.414). Correspondingly, both the LCE group and the PPX group had significantly increased daily ON time (1.62±1.59 hours, p<0.001 and 1.38±1.65, p<0.001, respectively), and the increases were comparable between the two groups (p=0.412). Both treatments improved the patients' WO symptoms, sleep quality, depression and quality of life. Six (7.59%) patients in the LCE group and 7 (14.29%) patients in the PPX group reported TEAEs, all of which were mild and tolerable. One patient in the LCE group and 2 patients in the PPX group experienced mild dyskinesia. Conclusion: LCE and LB+PPX were both effective, safe and tolerable in treating patients with PD who experienced WO.

Keywords: Parkinson's disease, Wearing off, Levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone, pramipexole, Chinese Patients

Received: 09 Aug 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yu, Liu, Gong, Ye, Huang, Zhao, Liu, Guo, Chen, Zhang, Chen, Shen and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Weiguo Liu, wgliunbh@sina.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.