Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Neuromuscular Disorders and Peripheral Neuropathies

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1682650

Effects of Neuromodulation Techniques on Pain and Depression in Patients with Phantom Limb Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Xu-chen  TaoXu-chen Tao1Shujie  MaShujie Ma2Jingwen  GongJingwen Gong3Jianzhong  ZhuJianzhong Zhu1Jinxiang  WangJinxiang Wang1Baoyu  WuBaoyu Wu2Yan  ZhuYan Zhu2Xinhao  LiuXinhao Liu1Lei  FangLei Fang1*
  • 1Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
  • 2The Second Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China
  • 3Shanghai Ruijin Hospital Gubei Branch, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of neuromodulation techniques in alleviating pain and depression in patients with phantom limb pain (PLP). Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of five databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) up to December 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating central (e.g., rTMS, tDCS) and peripheral (e.g., TENS, NMES, PNS) neuromodulation techniques in PLP patients were included. Primary outcomes were pain reduction, measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and depression, assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Data were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager and Stata, with heterogeneity assessed via the I² statistic and Q test. Results: 17 RCTs involving 510 patients were included. Central neuromodulation techniques, particularly rTMS and tDCS, significantly reduced pain in PLP patients [excitatory M1 rTMS: MD = -1.45, 95%CI (-2.78, -0.11), P = 0.03; anodal M1 tDCS: MD = -1.60, 95%CI (-2.45, 0.74), P = 0.0003]. tDCS with duration >15 minutes [I²=12%, MD=-1.91, 95%CI (-3.10, 0.72), P=0.002] and rTMS>7 days treatment [MD=-4.35, 95%CI(-6.34,-2.36), P<0.0001] were observed significant pooled effects. Peripheral techniques, including TENS and PNS, also showed pain relief, though with fewer studies. No significant improvement in depression Conclusion: Neuromodulation techniques, particularly rTMS and tDCS, are effective in reducing PLP but do not significantly alleviate depression. Further large-scale RCTs with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these findings and explore the efficacy of other neuromodulation methods.

Keywords: phantom limb pain, Neuromodulation techniques, review, Meta-analysis, Depression

Received: 09 Aug 2025; Accepted: 30 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tao, Ma, Gong, Zhu, Wang, Wu, Zhu, Liu and Fang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Lei Fang, fanglei586@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.