Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Neurotechnology

This article is part of the Research TopicEmerging Technologies and Data Analysis in Movement Disorder AssessmentsView all articles

Sensor-based quantification of items used in the MDS-UPDRS-III scale: repetitive lower-limb movements in healthy human participants

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Muttenz, Switzerland
  • 2Dynamics and statistics of complex systems, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Muttenz, Switzerland
  • 3Neurology, Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Baden, Switzerland
  • 4Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is used as a standardized approach to assess motor function in Parkinson's disease (PD). This assessment is based on the examiner’s subjective judgement and is therefore variable. While quantitative approaches have been evaluated for upper-limb movements, data is scarce on lower-limb movements. Thus, our aim was to implement and assess a setup to quantify lower-limb movements as defined in the MDS-UPDRS in healthy participants introducing new parameters for smoothness and acceleration patterns. Methods: Twenty-three participants (age-range=21-31 years) performed five 20-second trials for both lower-limb movement tasks from the MDS-UPDRS-III, i.e., toe tapping (item 3.7) and leg agility (item 3.8). Foot and leg movements were recorded using four inertial measurement units (two per leg: one mounted on the foot and one on the ankle). Biomarkers such as kinematic parameters (e.g., frequency, angular amplitude, movement smoothness, acceleration-based parameters) were extracted to characterize foot-movement dynamics (dominant vs. non-dominant leg), with statistical analyses including linear mixed-effects models applied to four consecutive, non-overlapping 5-second intervals. Results: A paired Wilcoxon test showed no significant differences in parameters for toe tapping and leg agility based on leg dominance. For toe tapping, the relationship between frequency and angle displayed non-linearity, with a clear decrease in angle with 17.41° -0.83°/interval*t (t=1-4 time intervals) and no clear decrease in frequency with 2.75Hz -0.02Hz/interval*t. The median frequency and angle for toe tapping were 2.8 Hz and 16° respectively. The median frequency for leg agility was 2.6 Hz. Conclusion: Reference values could be determined for all parameters including smoothness and acceleration patterns. The quantitative assessment of two MDS-UPDRS-III items shows that temporal changes and adaptation-mechanisms significantly influenced leg-movement dynamics. Reducing exercise duration to 10 seconds and implementing a metronome with defined frequency could enhance measurement accuracy and reliability, offering more precise parameters for future applications in PD-patients.

Keywords: Parkinson's disease, Quantitative assessment, Toe tapping, Leg agility, Inertial measurement unit, MDS-UPDRS

Received: 13 Aug 2025; Accepted: 28 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hunziker, Vogel, Kalt, Feiler, Hemm-Ode and Tarnutzer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Alexander A Tarnutzer

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.