Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Artificial Intelligence in Neurology

This article is part of the Research TopicArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning approaches for Survival Analysis in Neurological and Neurodegenerative diseasesView all 5 articles

Machine Learning–Enhanced Causal Inference of Surgical Decisions and Rehabilitation Strategies in Traumatic Brain Injury

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, United States
  • 2Miner School of Computer & Information Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, United States
  • 3Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) affects approximately 69 million people globally each year and leaves over 5 million with lasting disability, making it a leading cause of death and long-term impairment across all ages. Yet, most TBI research still relies on correlation-based regressions and basic propensity score methods, which are insufficient for addressing treatment-selection bias. This limitation underscores the need for modern causal-effect models to produce actionable evidence. This work applies a unified causal inference framework to quantify the impact of craniotomy, rehabilitation timing, and rehabilitation intensity on cognitive, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes in moderate-to-severe TBI. Our approach integrates outcome-adaptive LASSO for confounder selection, causal graph neural networks for structure discovery, inverse-probability weighting for average treatment effects (ATEs), and a causal-effect variational autoencoder to account for latent confounding. We analyzed data from 79,604 patients in the U.S. Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) database. Key treatments included craniotomy, very-early versus delayed rehabilitation start, and short versus long rehabilitation stays. Outcomes included discharge Functional Independence Measure (FIM) cognitive and motor scores, as well as follow-up assessments of productivity, social participation, and life-satisfaction. Results showed that craniotomy was causally associated with modest but statistically significant reductions in all five discharge FIM domains (average ATE ≈–0.10 to –0.17 on 1–7 scales). Very-early rehabilitation initiation was linked to improvements in follow-up productivity and life satisfaction (ATE≈+0.03 to +0.09 on 0–1 scales). Longer rehabilitation stays yielded the largest positive effects, enhancing both follow-up productivity and global FIM scores (ATE≈+0.08 to +0.24). All models achieved ≥90% accuracy in treatment assignment prediction, supporting the strength of confounder control and the robustness of the causal inferences.

Keywords: causal inference, Craniotomy, Functional independence, Rehabilitation timing, Traumatic Brain Injury

Received: 13 Aug 2025; Accepted: 23 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Irankhah, Pagare, Chetla, Shen, Alam and Wolkowicz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Mohammad Arif Ul Alam, mohammadariful_alam@uml.edu
Kelilah Wolkowicz, kelilah_wolkowicz@uml.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.