ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neuro-Otology
Effectiveness of three vestibular rehabilitation exercises for treating acute unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction: A multicenter randomized study
Provisionally accepted
- 1The Catholic University of Korea Incheon Saint Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
- 2The Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu-si, Republic of Korea
- 3Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea
- 4Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) is an established intervention for patients with acute unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction (aUPVD). However, the relative effectiveness of different VRT strategies remains uncertain. This multicenter randomized pilot trial aimed to compare the effects of customized vestibular rehabilitation therapy (CVRT), generic Cawthorne–Cooksey exercises (GVRT), and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) adaptation exercises on vestibular symptom recovery and functional improvement. Methods: A total of 34 patients with aUPVD were enrolled across three centers, of whom 23 completed the study and were included in the final analysis (CVRT, n=11; GVRT, n=6; VOR, n=6). All participants underwent an 8-week rehabilitation program, performing prescribed exercises three times daily. Outcomes included the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB), Functional Reach Test (FRT), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Disability Scale (DS), and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale. Nonparametric tests with post-hoc effect size estimation were applied. Results: Significant within-group improvements were observed in mCTSIB, VAS, DS, DHI, and ABC scores in the CVRT group (p<0.05). The GVRT group showed significant improvements in mCTSIB (foam EC), VAS, DS, DHI, and ABC (p<0.05), whereas the VOR adaptation group showed limited improvement in mCTSIB (foam EO) and DS. Although all three intervention groups demonstrated significant improvements after rehabilitation, no statistically significant differences were found among groups. The CVRT group demonstrated the largest numerical gains in VAS and ABC scores, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: All three vestibular physical therapy approaches effectively improved symptoms and functional balance in patients with aUPVD. While between-group differences were not statistically significant, the customized rehabilitation group showed the most consistent pattern of improvement. 2 These findings suggest potential clinical advantages of individualized therapy, warranting confirmation in larger studies.
Keywords: Vestibular Rehabilitation, acute unilateral vestibulopathy, Balance function, Dizziness, vestibulo-ocular reflex
Received: 17 Aug 2025; Accepted: 12 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lee, Lee, Seo, Son and Jeon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Eun-Ju Jeon, ejmercy@catholic.ac.kr
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.