ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neuro-Otology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1689672
This article is part of the Research TopicImproving Understanding and Treatment of Peripheral Positional Vertigo (PPV)View all 7 articles
Positive diagnostic positional tests in BPPV are higher in the morning than in the afternoon: a retrospective study
Provisionally accepted- 1The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Shunde, Foshan, China
- 2Central South University, Changsha, China
- 3Ning Xia Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningxia, China
- 4LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: Positional tests are the standard for diagnosing benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). We evaluated the relationship between the timing of the testing during the day and the rate of pathological findings. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical records from 929 patients with a medical history consistent with the diagnosis of BPPV from Jan 1st, 2023 until Dec 31st, 2024 was performed. The aim was to assess timing of examinations and diagnostic findings. Morning examinations were categorized as those initiated from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m., while afternoon examinations were defined from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. The rate of pathological positional tests was evaluated based on the observation of positional nystagmus induced by the diagnostic maneuvers. Results: A total of 929 individuals with the presumed diagnosis of BPPV were examined by diagnostic positional maneuvers. 590 individuals (63.51%) were examined in the morning and 339 (36.49%) in the afternoon. The positive rate of BPPV testing was 72.54% (428/590) in the morning group and 64.01% (217/339) in the afternoon group (P<0.01). Subgroup-analysis by semicircular canal type showed that number of posterior semicircular canal BPPV (pcBPPV) were 308 of 590 (52.20%) in the morning and 154 of 339 (45.43%) in the afternoon, with a significant difference (P=0.010). For horizontal semicircular canal BPPV (hcBPPV), the number were 115 of 590 (19.49%) in the morning and 60 of 339 (17.70%) in the afternoon (P=0.080). Hourly analysis for both canal types revealed the highest positive rate (74.6%) between 8:00 a.m. and 8:59 a.m. and lowest (51.9%) between 2:00 p.m. and 2:59 p.m., with higher positive rates in the morning (P=0.005). Multi-variate analysis showed a strong association with examination timing (P=0.005) with no correlation between age/gender and positive testing. Conclusion: The overall positive rate for positional tests for BPPV was significantly higher in the morning than in the afternoon. Subgroup analysis showed a statistically difference for pcBPPV but not for hcBPPV. These findings hold clinical implications for optimizing examination scheduling and improving diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with vertigo. Prospective studies are warranted to validate the reliability and validity of these observations.
Keywords: BPPV- Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, Nystagmus, Posterior canal BPPV, Horizontal canal BPPV, diagnostic positional tests
Received: 20 Aug 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Lu, Zhan, Xu, Chen, Zhou, Liu, Yang and Strupp. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Biru Zhang, 23320323@smu.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.