CLINICAL TRIAL article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Sleep Disorders
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Advance on Sleep Disorder: Mechanisms and InterventionsView all 20 articles
Default mode network and visual network responsiveness to transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation predict its variable efficacy in primary insomnia disorder: a randomized controlled trial
Provisionally accepted
- 1Affiliated Sports Hospital of Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, China
- 2Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
- 3Sichuan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Backgrounds: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been proven effective in treating primary insomnia disorder (PID). However, its efficacy exhibits inter-individual variability. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the brain functional mechanisms underlying variable efficacy and to identify potential biomarkers that could predict taVNS efficacy. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 54 PID patients who received real or sham taVNS to assess brain activity and autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses. An additional 46 patients receiving real taVNS were recruited to enlarge the treatment cohort, thereby enhancing the statistical power for biomarker identification. Results: Post-treatment, the mean amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (mALFF) of sensorimotor network (SMN), default mode network (DMN), and visual network (VN) in treatment group were significantly increased than those before treatment, and the mALFFs value of the combination of all the differentially significant brain regions (especially DMN+VN) before taVNS were correlated with its efficacy. The heart rate variability indicators "root mean square of successive differences, percentage of adjacent N-N intervals differing by more than 50 ms, and high frequency (HF) during taVNS were significantly greater than pre-treatment. The mALFFs value of DMN and VN before taVNS were correlated with HF during taVNS. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that taVNS may exerts therapeutic effects in PID through modulating the activities of the DMN (left precuneus and bilateral cuneus), VN (left lingual gyrus, left superior occipital gyrus, left cuneus and bilateral calcarine), and SMN (right precentral, right rolandic operculum, bilateral postcentral gyrus, bilateral paracentral gyrus, bilateral supplementary motor areas and left middle cingulate gyrus), thereby regulating the ANS activity in PID patients. Individual differences in functional responsiveness of the DMN+VN+SMN networks, particularly "DMN(left Precuneus and left cuneus)+VN(left superior occipital and left cuneus)" to ANS modulation during taVNS were correlated with variability in efficacy. Additionally, baseline DMN/VN activity and HF parameters during stimulation demonstrated potential as predictive biomarkers for taVNS efficacy.
Keywords: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, Primary insomnia disorder, Heart rate variability, individual efficacy, Brain-heart interaction, efficacy prediction
Received: 11 Sep 2025; Accepted: 24 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wu, Duan, Wang, She, Hu and He. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Benxiang He
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.