EDITORIAL article
Front. Nucl. Eng.
Sec. Radioactive Waste Management
This article is part of the Research TopicEURAD: State of the Art in Research and Development on Radioactive Waste Management and DisposalView all 8 articles
Editorial: EURAD: State of the Art in Research and Development on Radioactive Waste Management and Disposal
Provisionally accepted- 1Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
- 2Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et des Technologie Associees, Nantes, France
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
For all societies that rely or have relied fully or partly on nuclear energy the long-term management of radioactive waste remains a complex challenge for generations to come. Issues are the multidisciplinary scientific understanding of key processes often coupled over time and space scales, the search of appropriate and acceptable disposal sites, the development of engineering solutions and the organization of transparency for public engagement. Deep geological repositories (DGRs) are industrial megaprojects, internationally recognised as the most robust solution, designed to isolate hazardous materials from the biosphere for more than tens of thousands of years [1]. First repositories have been licenced recently.The European Joint Programme on Radioactive Waste Management (EURAD) provides a collaborative roadmap for this work, consolidating research, development, knowledge management and demonstration (RD&D) to strengthen the scientific basis for geological disposal [2]. A cornerstone of EURAD is the systematic production of Stateof-the-Art (SoTA) reports in various research fields. These documents synthesise and review current understanding, identify uncertainties, and guide future research directions.This editorial introduces the SoTA reports published in this Research Topic and produced within EURAD-1, highlighting their contributions to the international knowledge base for geological disposal. Demonstrating the ongoing innovations in radioactive waste disposal material choices, the workpackage ConCorD report on container corrosion under disposal conditions (Muñoz et al., 2024) describe the long-term integrity of sealed containers. It covers a range of materials used to provide the long-term primary containment barrier, typical for high-level waste and spent fuel disposal containers. It surveys the current understanding of degradation processes across a range of environments, including the effects of irradiation, chemical transients, microbial activity, and extreme environmental fluctuations. It also explores the potential of novel container materials and highlights approaches to integrate experimental data into predictive models of container lifetime. Its inclusion affirms the importance of rigorous, coupled analysis of container behaviour as a keystone in safety case development. The chemical environment of a disposal cell in deep geological formations is shaped by the interactions between wasteforms, engineered barriers, and surrounding host rock. Two companion SoTA reports address this complexity.• Part I (Neeft et al.) examines processes at interfaces and the overall chemical evolution at the disposal cell scale, focusing on safety, performance, and optimisation.• Part II (Deissmann et al.) describes the experimental and modelling tools that underpin our understanding and support the construction of coherent narratives of disposal cell evolution.Together, these reports provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating chemical evolution in disposal systems and its significance for long-term safety. They cover disposal cells and material interfaces common to cemented intermediate level waste disposal concepts and vitrified high level waste in carbon steel overpacks with bentonite or concrete buffer materials. Clay-based materials are integral to disposal concepts, both as engineered barriers and as host rock formations. Their thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) behaviour at repositoryrelevant conditions is the focus of two SoTA reports.• Villar et al. present the state of the art on clay buffers, with particular attention to the effects of elevated temperatures. Together, these studies improve understanding of how clay barriers evolve under thermal, hydraulic, and mechanical stresses, reinforcing confidence in their role towards contributing to the long-term containment of radioactive waste in DGRs. The long-term safety of geological disposal relies on the ability of engineered and natural barriers to retain radionuclides and limit their transport. The SoTA report by Maes et al. reviews current knowledge of radionuclide retention and migration in both clay and crystalline host rocks. This synthesis clarifies the key processes that govern radionuclide mobility and highlights areas where further research is needed. Repository performance assessments increasingly depend on advanced modelling of complex, coupled processes at various time and space scales. The SoTA report by Claret et al. reviews recent developments in numerical tools and high-performance computing for reactive transport, two-phase flow, and THM modelling in porous and fractured media. These advances enable more robust sensitivity analyses and uncertainty quantification, which are essential for reliable safety assessments. The SoTA reports in this collection demonstrate the scientific depth and collaborative effort underpinning the geological disposal of radioactive waste. By consolidating existing knowledge, identifying gaps, and providing direction for future research, they strengthen confidence in geological disposal as a safe and responsible long-term solution.Through these contributions, EURAD continues to build a shared, internationally recognised evidence base that will support informed decision-making on radioactive waste management for decades to come.
Keywords: disposal solutions, EURAD, Geological disposal, Interim storage, Waste characterisation, waste disposal, Waste Management, Waste processing
Received: 10 Dec 2025; Accepted: 23 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Beattie and Grambow. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Tara Beattie
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.