Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Oncol.
Sec. Hematologic Malignancies
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1402106
This article is part of the Research Topic Allogenic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Hematological Malignancies: Controversies and Perspective View all 8 articles

Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: is there still a place?

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Hematology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Santo Spirito Hospital, Pescara, Italy
  • 2 Department of Medicine and Sciences of Aging, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The introduction of novel agents dramatically improved response and outcomes of multiple myeloma (MM) and led to a sharp decline in the use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Thus, recent guidelines do not recommend anymore allo-HSCT as consolidation in the firstline treatment of newly diagnosed MM, even in high-risk patients. In relapsed/refractory setting, allo-HSCT is not routinely recommended but should only be performed within clinical trials in young and high-risk patients. Nonetheless, allo-HSCT still represents a potential curative approach that has been used for decades in the treatment of MM and plasma cell neoplasms with favorable results and may still represent a treatment option for carefully selected patients. Despite promising results were obtained with CAR T cell therapies and bispecific antibodies in triple-and penta-exposed/refractory MM, these patients will inevitably relapse. To date, less is known about outcomes of allo-HSCT in patients exposed to novel immunotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, allo-HSCT could represent a reasonable treatment choice for younger and high-risk patients who have relapsed after CAR T cell therapies and bispecific antibodies as well as an alternative for patients not eligible to these treatments and in those countries where immunotherapies are not yet available. In the choice of conditioning, reduced intensity conditioning regimens are currently recommended for the lower toxicity and mortality. Moreover, the use of alternative donors, particularly haploidentical, has progressively increased in last years with results comparable to full matched donors. Finally, post-transplantation maintenance strategies are encouraged whenever feasible.

    Keywords: Allogeneic transplantation, Multiple Myeloma, Immunotherapy, relapsed refractory multiple myeloma, Alternative donor

    Received: 16 Mar 2024; Accepted: 14 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Liberatore, Fioritoni and Di Ianni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Carmine Liberatore, Hematology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Santo Spirito Hospital, Pescara, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.