ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Organ. Psychol.
Sec. Performance and Development
Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/forgp.2025.1523986
This article is part of the Research TopicIncreasing Environmental Sustainability in Organizations with Systems ResearchView all 4 articles
Appraising Environmental Competencies in Organizations: Scale Development and Relevance for Internal Stakeholders
Provisionally accepted- DePaul University, Chicago, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Large-scale changes in organizations require internal coordination across multiple systems, and internal stakeholders are key to these change efforts. For pro-environmental efforts, understanding how internal stakeholders view the organization's impact supports understanding and coordination. Using a systems theory framework focused on psychological factors of environmental sustainability in organizations, we developed an 11-item scale of environmental competencies for organizations (ECO). Internal stakeholders appraised the effectiveness of organizations' environmental actions. The scale's relevance to the theory of planned behavior and communication literature were framed within the macro system of inputs, throughputs, and outputs of organizational environmental sustainability. A pilot test of the scale with 216 university students suggested a three-factor model for the stakeholder perceptions. Responses from 587 additional participants from a different university (250 university employees and 347 students) also fit the same model. These stakeholder appraisals of environmental competencies were predicted to positively relate to organizational attraction, pro-environmental self-efficacy, green behaviors, organizational commitment, and intentions to leave the organization. Being informed about an organization's environmental actions and having more organizational communication sources about sustainability were predicted to increase expressions of opinions (eco-opinions). The relationships of turnover intentions and organizational commitment with environmental competencies were predicted to be moderated by environmental beliefs, such that the relationships would be stronger the more concerned stakeholders were about the environment. Results supported that appraisals of environmental competencies were related to inputs like organizational attraction and outputs of organizational commitment, turnover intent, and increased green behaviors since joining the organization. Opinions about environmental competencies were more likely to be expressed when internal stakeholders felt informed of organizational activities and had more sources of environmental communications. Evidence suggests that the ECO scale is a useful tool for organizational sustainability insights and can contribute gaining understanding how the psychological system relates to, as well as amplifies or derails, organizational sustainability efforts.
Keywords: Environmental sustainability, Environmental competencies, Pro-environmental action, Organizational Change, Systems Theory
Received: 06 Nov 2024; Accepted: 09 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Carruth and Stuhlmacher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Nicholas Carruth, DePaul University, Chicago, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.