Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Organ. Psychol.

Sec. Organizational Justice, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging

Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/forgp.2025.1667418

Contingent Coherence and Relational Inclusion: Women, Work, and Invisible Illness

Provisionally accepted
Armand  BamArmand Bam*Joy  LulemaJoy Lulema
  • University of Stellenbosch Business School, Stellenbosch, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This article explores how professionally employed women living with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a chronic, fluctuating, and largely invisible illness, navigate the relational and emotional demands of credibility, disclosure, and performance in the workplace. Using narrative-interpretive interviews with eight women in cognitively and emotionally demanding roles, the study draws on feminist disability theory to examine how inclusion is co-produced through interpersonal discretion, emotional restraint, and invisible labour, rather than guaranteed through formal policy. The analysis identifies four recurring tensions between disclosure and protection, credibility and capacity, aspiration and sustainability, and policy and practice which converge in the concept of Contingent Coherence. This term captures the continuous, relational effort to maintain professional viability in systems that overlook episodic fluctuation. Drawing on the findings we also propose a Relational Framework of Inclusion, underpinned by three enabling conditions, trust, responsiveness, and ethical proximity, as essential to fostering supportive environments for employees with invisible illnesses. By foregrounding the lived negotiations of workplace inclusion, this article contributes to critical HRM, feminist disability studies, and organisational behaviour literature. It argues that inclusion must be understood not as a fixed institutional achievement, but as a fragile, relational practice sustained through emotional labour, managerial discretion, and mutual intelligibility.

Keywords: Invisible illness, chronic illness, Feminist disability theory, organizationalinclusion, Identity work

Received: 16 Jul 2025; Accepted: 22 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bam and Lulema. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Armand Bam, armandb@usb.ac.za

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.