Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Organ. Psychol.

Sec. Employee Well-being and Health

This article is part of the Research TopicCurrent Research Methods in Organizational PsychologyView all articles

From Net Effects to Configurational Pathways: A Dual Examination of Employee Innovative Behavior through Integrated SEM-fsQCA Framework

Provisionally accepted
Yongji  JiaoYongji JiaoHAI  CHENGHAI CHENG*Jieyu  OuyangJieyu OuyangXinyi  HuangXinyi Huang
  • Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

While conventional structural equation modeling (SEM) emphasizes net effects between variables, it inadequately captures the multiple equifinal pathways underlying employee innovative behavior. This study advances a methodological triangulation approach by integrating SEM with fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine the mechanisms through which trait mindfulness influences innovative behavior. Drawing on componential creativity theory and social cognitive theory, we analyzed 297 employees from digitally transforming organizations. SEM findings reveal that trait mindfulness affects innovative behavior through work flourishing (full mediation) and organizational resilience (partial mediation), with digital leadership exerting a negative moderating effect. fsQCA subsequently identifies three equifinal configurations leading to high innovative behavior, with the "high mindfulness × high resilience" configuration emerging as the dominant pathway. This study demonstrates the methodological complementarity of SEM-fsQCA integration: whereas SEM elucidates symmetric causal relationships and average effects, fsQCA unveils asymmetric configurational patterns and necessary/sufficient conditions.

Keywords: employee trait mindfulness, Innovative behavior, work thriving, Organizational resilience, Digital leadership, Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

Received: 21 Oct 2025; Accepted: 25 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jiao, CHENG, Ouyang and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: HAI CHENG

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.