The interplay between climate change, parasitology, and the rise of emerging technologies presents a dynamic frontier for research aimed at safeguarding human, animal, and environmental health (; ; ). Within the One Health framework, an integrated approach that acknowledges the interconnection of these scientific fields (; ; ) underscores the importance of utilizing geospatial technologies and predictive modeling in order to anticipate and address the risk posed by zoonotic parasitic diseases exacerbated by climate variability (; ; ; ).
1 Introduction
The ongoing impacts of climate change are significantly affecting the epidemiology of parasitic diseases (Víchová et al., 2018), with rising temperatures, shifting precipitation, and extreme weather altering the habitats (Zhao et al., 2021; Viani et al., 2023c) and life cycles of vectors and pathogens (; ; ). Zoonotic diseases, which make up about 75% of emerging infectious diseases in humans, are on the rise (; ). Such increase is often linked to changes in wildlife behavior and habitat due to human activities. Technological advancements in Earth Observation (EO) (), Geographic information systems (GIS), and remote sensing have enabled the creation of suitability maps (; ; Viani et al., 2024b, ), disease tracking, and informed public health policies (Yu et al., 2017; , , ). Integrating these tools with high-resolution climate models and cloud-based platforms like Google Earth Engine (GEE) () allows for detailed spatial and temporal analyses, facilitating targeted interventions and risk assessments (; ; ; ; ). This Research Topic emphasizes the innovative use of geospatial tools and modeling techniques in Parasitology and One Health.
2 Insights from the contributing articles
The first contribution, “Spatial prediction of the probability of liver fluke infection in water resource within sub-basin using an optimized geographically-weighted regression model” (Pumhirunroj et al.) focuses on predicting the spatial distribution of liver fluke infections in sub-basin using an optimized geographically weighted regression (GWR) model. By analyzing infection data and environmental variables such as streams and the Normalized Difference Moisture Index (NDMI), the authors identified key predictors of infection fasciolosis risk. Model-3, which incorporated these evironmental variables, demonstrated superior accuracy, with an R² improvement from 0.754 to 0.800. The results emphasize the value of fine-scale spatial analyses in identifying high-risk areas and optimizing resource allocation for disease control.
The second review-article “Amoebae: beyond pathogens - exploring their benefits and future potential,” (Dinda et al.) explores the dual nature of amoebae as both harmful pathogens and beneficial contributors to ecosystems. Pathogenic species like Entamoeba histolytica and the brain-eating ameoba, Naegleria fowleri, pose significant health risks, while other species play crucial roles in nutrient cycling and in controlling plant pathogens. The authors highlight the potential of amoebae as model organisms in biomedical research and their promise for future biotechnological applications. This work broadens our understanding of amoebae’s ecological and scientific significance, offering a nuanced perspective about their role within the One Health framework.
Finally, the review “Exploring extracellular vesicles in zoonotic helminth biology: implications for diagnosis, therapeutic, and delivery” (Qadeer et al.) delves into the promising field of extracellular vesicles (EVs). By acting as mediators of intercellular communication, EVs from parasitic helminths offer novel avenues for early diagnosis and treatment. The potential for EV-based biomarkers to improve diagnostic specificity and therapeutic targeting is particularly significant in the context of zoonotic diseases. This article not only highlights cutting-edge research but also points to future applications in disease management and control.
3 Current and ongoing research perspectives
The studies presented in this Research Topic collectively underscore the potential of integrating GIS, remote sensing, and advanced modeling techniques into Parasitology. However, to fully take advantage of these technologies, future research should address several key areas:
3.1 High-resolution climate models
The development and application of climate models with ever-increasing spatial and temporal resolutions are critical for (i) detailed habitat analysis of vectors at local scales and (ii) anticipating future changes. These models can refine predictions of vector distributions, enabling more precise risk assessments and interventions.
3.2 Cloud computing and big data
Platforms like Google Earth Engine (GEE) are revolutionizing the processing and analysis of large-scale environmental datasets. By enabling access to global EO data and providing robust computational resources, GEE facilitates detailed analyses of vector habitats, land-use changes, and environmental suitability for disease transmission.
3.3 Dynamic risk mapping
Combining real-time EO data with predictive models enables the creation of dynamic risk maps. These maps can inform timely interventions, especially in data-sparse regions where climate change is accelerating shifts in vector habitats and disease patterns.
3.4 Cross-disciplinary collaboration
The One Health framework inherently requires collaboration across disciplines, including ecology, epidemiology, climatology, and public health. Strengthening these collaborations will enhance the development of holistic models that account for the complex interplay between environmental and socio-economic factors.
3.5 Local-scale analysis
While global and regional studies provide valuable insights, local-scale analyses are essential for effective implementation of interventions. Studies like the one about liver fluke infection model, demonstrate the utility of tailored approaches that consider specific environmental and socio-cultural contexts.
3.6 Open data platforms for wildlife georeferencing
Standardized, open-access platforms for georeferencing wildlife movements and habitats are critical for improving epidemiological studies. By systematically cataloging animal locations, researchers can better understand disease transmission dynamics and assess the impact of environmental changes on wildlife health.
3.7 Fixed monitoring areas for parasites
Establishing fixed monitoring sites for parasites such as ticks will enable the development of real-time exposure risk bulletins for domestic animals, livestock, and humans by integrating remote-sensed data. These bulletins could serve as early warning systems, empowering stakeholders to take preventive measures during high-risk periods.
The findings presented in this Research Topic have significant implications for policy and practice. The ability to generate high-resolution suitability maps and dynamic risk assessments can inform science-based policy decisions, guiding resource allocation and intervention strategies. Additionally, the integration of EO data and GIS modeling into national health systems can enhance surveillance and response capabilities, particularly in under-resourced and data-sparse regions (; ; ; ).
4 Conclusion
As climate change continues to reshape ecosystems and disease dynamics, the integration of advanced technologies and interdisciplinary approaches will be paramount in addressing emerging challenges. The studies featured in this Research Topic illustrate the potential of GIS, remote sensing, and modeling to enhance our understanding of parasitic diseases and inform effective interventions. By embracing these tools and fostering cross-sector collaborations, the One Health community can contribute to a more resilient and sustainable future.
Statements
Author contributions
TO: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AV: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft. RO: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. CC: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
Author TO was employed by the company INVA spa.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AdlerC.HuggelC.OrloveB.NolinA. (2019). Climate change in the mountain cryosphere: impacts and responses. Regional Environ. Change19, 1225–1228. doi: 10.1007/s10113-019-01507-6
2
AfuyeG. A.KalumbaA. M.OrimoloyeI. R. (2021). Characterisation of vegetation response to climate change: A review. Sustainability13, 7265. doi: 10.3390/su13137265
3
AmdouniJ.ConteA.IppolitiC.CandeloroL.ToraS.SghaierS.et al. (2022). Culex pipiens distribution in Tunisia: Identification of suitable areas through Random Forest and MaxEnt approaches. Veterinary Med. Sci.8, 2703–2715. doi: 10.1002/vms3.v8.6
4
AnyambaA.ChretienJ.-P.BritchS. C.SoebiyantoR. P.SmallJ. L.JepsenR.et al. (2019). Global disease outbreaks associated with the 2015–2016 El Niño event. Sci. Rep.9, 1930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38034-z
5
AnyambaA.LinthicumK. J.SmallJ. L.CollinsK. M.TuckerC. J.PakE. W.et al. (2012). Climate teleconnections and recent patterns of human and animal disease outbreaks. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.6, e1465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001465
6
ArsevskaE.HenglT.SingletonD. A.NobleP.-J. M.CaminadeC.EneanyaO. A.et al. (2024). Risk factors for tick attachment in companion animals in Great Britain: a spatiotemporal analysis covering 2014–2021. Parasites Vectors17, 29. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-06094-4
7
CaillyP.TranA.BalenghienT.L’AmbertG.TotyC.EzannoP. (2012). A climate-driven abundance model to assess mosquito control strategies. Ecol. Model.227, 7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.10.027
8
CaminadeC. (2021). eo4 how to model the impact of climate change on vector-borne diseases? Climate Ticks Dis.26, 243–255.
9
CaminadeC.MorseA. P.FevreE. M.MorS.BaylisM.Kelly-HopeL. (2023). Forecasting the risk of vector-borne diseases at different time scales: an overview of the CLIMate SEnsitive DISease (CLIMSEDIS) Forecasting Tool project for the Horn of Africa. EGU23. doi: 10.5194/egusphere-egu23-7652
10
CarellaE.OrusaT.VianiA.MeloniD.Borgogno-MondinoE.OrusaR. (2022). An integrated, tentative remote-sensing approach based on NDVI entropy to model canine distemper virus in wildlife and to prompt science-based management policies. Animals12, 1049. doi: 10.3390/ani12081049
11
ChamailléL.TranA.MeunierA.BourdoiseauG.ReadyP.DedetJ.-P. (2010). Environmental risk mapping of canine leishmaniasis in France. Parasites Vectors3, 1–8. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-3-31
12
ConteA.CandeloroL.IppolitiC.MonacoF.De MassisF.BrunoR.et al. (2015). Spatio-temporal identification of areas suitable for West Nile disease in the Mediterranean Basin and Central Europe. PLoS One10, e0146024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146024
13
GorelickN.HancherM.DixonM.IlyushchenkoS.ThauD.MooreR. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ.202, 18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
14
IppolitiC.CandeloroL.GilbertM.GoffredoM.ManciniG.CurciG.et al. (2019). Defining ecological regions in Italy based on a multivariate clustering approach: A first step towards a targeted vector borne disease surveillance. PLoS One14, e0219072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219072
15
LambinE. F.TranA.VanwambekeS. O.LinardC.SotiV. (2010). Pathogenic landscapes: interactions between land, people, disease vectors, and their animal hosts. Int. J. Health geographics9, 1–13. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-9-54
16
OrusaT.Borgogno MondinoE. (2021). Exploring short-term climate change effects on rangelands and broad-leaved forests by free satellite data in Aosta valley (Northwest Italy). Climate9, 47. doi: 10.3390/cli9030047
17
OrusaT.CammareriD.Borgogno MondinoE. (2022a). A possible land cover EAGLE approach to overcome remote sensing limitations in the Alps based on sentinel-1 and sentinel-2: the case of Aosta valley (NW Italy). Remote Sens.15, 178. doi: 10.3390/rs15010178
18
OrusaT.CammareriD.Borgogno MondinoE. (2022b). A scalable earth observation service to map land cover in geomorphological complex areas beyond the dynamic world: an application in Aosta valley (NW Italy). Appl. Sci.13, 390. doi: 10.3390/app13010390
19
OrusaT.CammareriD.FreppazD.VuillermozP.Borgogno MondinoE. (2023a). “Sen4MUN: A prototypal service for the distribution of contributions to the european municipalities from copernicus satellite imagery. A case in Aosta valley (NW Italy),” in Italian Conference on Geomatics and Geospatial Technologies (Basel, Switzerland: Springer), 109–125.
20
OrusaT.FarboA.De PetrisS.SarviaF.CammareriD.Borgogno-MondinoE.et al. (2024a). “Characterization of alpine pastures using multitemporal earth observation data within the climate change framework,” in Earth Observation: current challenges and opportunities for environmental monitoring (Basel, Switzerland: Associazione Italiana di Telerilevamento (AIT), 110–114.
21
OrusaT.MondinoE. B. (2019). “Landsat 8 thermal data to support urban management and planning in the climate change era: A case study in Torino area, NW Italy,” in Remote Sensing Technologies and Applications in Urban Environments IV (Bellingham, Washington USA: International Society for Optics and Photonics), 111570O.
22
OrusaT.OrusaR.VianiA.CarellaE.Borgogno MondinoE. (2020). Geomatics and EO data to support wildlife diseases assessment at landscape level: A pilot experience to map infectious keratoconjunctivitis in chamois and phenological trends in Aosta valley (NW Italy). Remote Sens.12, 3542. doi: 10.3390/rs12213542
23
OrusaT.VianiA.Borgogno-MondinoE. (2024b). IRIDE, the Euro-Italian earth observation program: overview, current progress, global expectations, and recommendations. Environ. Sci. Proc.29, 74. doi: 10.3390/ECRS2023-16839
24
OrusaT.VianiA.CammareriD.Borgogno MondinoE. (2023b). A google earth engine algorithm to map phenological metrics in mountain areas worldwide with landsat collection and sentinel-2. Geomatics3, 221–238. doi: 10.3390/geomatics3010012
25
OrusaT.VianiA.MoyoB.CammareriD.Borgogno-MondinoE. (2023c). Risk assessment of rising temperatures using landsat 4–9 LST time series and meta® Population dataset: an application in Aosta valley, NW Italy. Remote Sens.15, 2348. doi: 10.3390/rs15092348
26
ShortE. E.CaminadeC.ThomasB. N. (2017). Climate change contribution to the emergence or re-emergence of parasitic diseases. Infect. Diseases: Res. Treat10, 1178633617732296.
27
TranA.TrevennecC.LutwamaJ.SseruggaJ.GelyM.PittiglioC.et al. (2016). Development and assessment of a geographic knowledge-based model for mapping suitable areas for Rift Valley fever transmission in Eastern Africa. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.10, e0004999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004999
28
VianiA.DivariS.LovisoloS.ZanetS.Borgogno-MondinoE.OrusaR.et al. (2023a). “Bartonella spp. distribution assessment in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) coupling geospatially-based techniques,” in Atti SISVet (Bari, Italy: SISVet), 69–69.
29
VianiA.OrusaT.Borgogno-MondinoE.OrusaR. (2023b). Snow metrics as proxy to assess sarcoptic mange in wild boar: preliminary results in Aosta valley (Italy). Life13, 987. doi: 10.3390/life13040987
30
VianiA.OrusaT.Borgogno-MondinoE.OrusaR. (2024a). A one health google earth engine web-GIS application to evaluate and monitor water quality worldwide. Euro-Mediterranean J. Environ. Integration, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s41207-024-00528-w
31
VianiA.OrusaT.DivariS.LovisoloS.ZanetS.OrusaR.et al. (2025). Detection of Bartonella spp. in foxes’ populations in Piedmont and Aosta Valley (NW Italy) coupling geospatially-based techniques. Front. Veterinary Sci.11, 1388440. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1388440
32
VianiA.OrusaT.MandolaM. L.RobettoS.BelvedereM.RennaG.et al. (2023c). “R07. 1 Tick’s suitability habitat maps and tick-host relationships in wildlife. A One Health approach based on multitemporal remote sensed data, entropy and Meta® population dataset in Aosta Valley, NW Italy,” in GeoVet 2023 International Conference. Available online at: https://www.veterinariaitaliana.izs.it/index.php/GEOVET23/article/view/3256.
33
VianiA.OrusaT.MandolaM. L.RobettoS.NogarolC.MondinoE. B.et al. (2024b). Grading Habitats for Ticks by Mapping a Suitability Index based on Remotely Sensed Data and Meta® population dataset in Aosta Valley, NW Italy. Veterinaria Italiana60.
34
VíchováB.BonaM.MiterpákováM.KraljikJ.ČabanováV.NemčíkováG.et al. (2018). Fleas and ticks of red foxes as vectors of canine bacterial and parasitic pathogens, in Slovakia, Central Europe. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis.18, 611–619. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2314
35
YuX.WuX.LuoC.RenP. (2017). Deep learning in remote sensing scene classification: a data augmentation enhanced convolutional neural network framework. GIScience Remote Sens.54, 741–758. doi: 10.1080/15481603.2017.1323377
36
ZhaoG.-P.WangY.-X.FanZ.-W.JiY.LiuM.ZhangW.-H.et al. (2021). Mapping ticks and tick-borne pathogens in China. Nat. Commun.12, 1075. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21375-1
Summary
Keywords
One Health, modeling, parasitology, climate change, GIS, remote sensing
Citation
Orusa T, Viani A, d’Alessio SG, Orusa R and Caminade C (2025) Editorial: One Health approaches and modeling in parasitology in the climate change framework and possible supporting tools adopting GIS and remote sensing. Front. Parasitol. 4:1560799. doi: 10.3389/fpara.2025.1560799
Received
14 January 2025
Accepted
06 March 2025
Published
19 March 2025
Volume
4 - 2025
Edited and reviewed by
Alyssa E. Barry, Deakin University, Australia
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Orusa, Viani, d’Alessio, Orusa and Caminade.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Annalisa Viani, aviani@ausl.vda.it
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.