Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Pharmacol., 01 June 2022
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
This article is part of the Research Topic Evidence for Assessing Drug Safety and Drug Use in Older People View all 24 articles

Editorial: Evidence for Assessing Drug Safety and Drug Use in Older People

  • 1Graduate Course in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba (Uniso), São Paulo, Brazil
  • 2Institution of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  • 3Central Pharmacy, Albert Szent Györgyi Medical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  • 4Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Szent Györgyi Medical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
  • 5Multidisciplinary Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Brazil
  • 6Postgraduate Program in Collective Health, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo, Brazil
  • 7Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • 8Centre of Medical and Bio Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
  • 9Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa

Prescribing for older patients presents several challenges. Older people often suffer from two or more chronic diseases (multimorbidity) and therefore use a greater number of medications compared to other age groups. As a result, they are more susceptible polypharmacy, and associated drug-related problems, including potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), drug ineffectiveness, drug interactions, and adverse drug events (Nobili et al., 2011; Aggarwal et al., 2020). Consequently, optimizing drug therapy is a crucial part of caring for an elderly individual. This is increasingly important given the rising number of older adults across countries in the coming years, with one in six of the world’s population over 60 by 2050 and the associated resource implications (World Health Organization, 2021).

Many studies (Oliveira et al., 2012; Shah and Hajjar, 2012; Khatter et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2021) point out that polypharmacy is a risk factor for PIM, particularly for older patients. The more medications a patient are taking, the more likely they are to have an adverse drug event (ADE), potentially experience a drug-drug interaction, take a PIM, or be non-compliant to one or more of the medications prescribed (Shah and Hajjar, 2012).

This Research Topic included 23 articles and nine of them (Ambrož et al.; Candeias et al.; Chen et al.; Kardas et al.; Kurczewska-Michalak et al.; Machado-Duque et al.; Perpétuo et al.; Schneider et al.; Bobrova et al.) studied PIM and polypharmacy in older adults. Four of them (Kardas et al.; Khatter et al., 2021; Machado-Duque et al.; Schneider et al.) estimate the prevalence of PIM or polypharmacy in older adults.

In recent years, several strategies and tools have been developed to identify the inappropriate prescribing of medications. Typically, adaptations and selections have to be made depending on the setting and the medications available in a country (Motter et al., 2018; Motter et al., 2019). STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) are criteria typically used as a tool for clinicians to review PIMs in older adults and have been endorsed as best practice by some organizations. The study of Bobrova et al. developed an integrated PIM clinical decision support tool for identification of drug-related problems among geriatric patients in geriatric multi-morbid polypharmacy patients, using the EU-PIM and EURO-FORTA lists, with a focus on high-risk medications. The articles from Candeias et al. and Perpétuo et al. analyzed the concordance and prevalence of PIM different tools.

In particular, polypharmacy is known to cause a higher risk of ADEs as well as drug-drug interactions, which often leads to poor compliance with prescribed medicines. All these negatively impact on the health of patients as well as increase the risk of geriatric syndromes, e.g., cognitive impairment or falls. An important disparity is the difference of sex and gender in the proportion of types of medication used among older patients Lu et al., which needs to be factored into future prescribing.

Avoidable ADEs are the consequences of inappropriate drug prescribing including inappropriate polypharmacy. This, in turn, leads to increased costs and health care expenditures (Maher et al., 2014). The studies of Alnijadi et al. and Katsuno et al. analyzed the direct cost of managing adverse drug events and that of avoidable ADEs as well as cost-related medication non-compliance with medicines on healthcare utilization and patient-reported outcomes. Consequently, we are seeing health authorities across countries instigate activities to improve prescribing in the older adults and reduce ADEs and their associated costs, with these activities likely to grow with an increasing older population (MacBride-Stewart et al., 2021).

Numerous factors contribute to the appropriateness and comprehensive quality of drug prescribing. The process of prescribing a medication is multifaceted and includes: verifying that a drug is indicated and avoiding overuse of medicines for prevention, selecting the best drug, determining a dose and duration appropriate for the patient’s physiologic status, monitoring for effectiveness and toxicity, educating the patient about expected side effects, and indications for seeking a consultation.

Zazzara et al. verified the medication use and costs among older adults aged 90 years and conclude that the persistent use of preventive medications highlights the potential lack of awareness regarding medication rationalization among clinicians and provided guidance for optimizing prescriptions. Chen et al. identified factors that have an impact on the management of potentially inappropriate prescribing and concluded that gerontology practitioners should be prudent in applying clinical guidelines to provide personalized, comprehensive assessment of decision making of prescriptions, especially in socioeconomically deprived areas. Qu et al. explored the relationship between drug literacy and frailty and conclude that the first was an important consideration in the development, implementation, and evaluation of frailty.

Approaches to decrease inappropriate prescribing in older adults include educational interventions, peer comparison feedback, computerized order entry and decision support, multidisciplinary team care led by physicians, clinical pharmacists, and combinations of these approaches (Rochon, 2022). The scoping review of (Kurczewska-Michalak et al.) published in this Research Topic mapped available interventions and more complex strategies to prevent and manage polypharmacy in the older adults and discussed their potential implementation. The authors concluded that the development of strategies for the detection and prevention of drug-related problems is important to guide and support clinical decision-making and strengthen research into drug safety. This is an essential condition for achieving wide-ranging improvements in the management of older patients. Whilst different approaches have been identified to avoid drug-related problems in older patients, there is still insufficient information about their clinical importance or their public health impact. The authors also suggested that guidance on polypharmacy management in older adults is still limited. Initiatives to understand and conceptualize healthcare professional’s barriers and enablers can be used to increase knowledge translation and strengthen capacity for appropriate interventions in routine clinical practice (Motter et al., 2021).

This Research Topic also included studies comparing the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants or antiplatelets in cardiovascular disease (Wawruch et al.; Zhao et al.; Li et al.). This is important as there were concerns with excessive bleeding in the elderly when dabigatran, the first non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) was first launched (Malmström et al., 2013). Physician knowledge has now grown, with more recent studies comparing key issues such as effectiveness and safety among the NOACs (Mueller et al., 2019; Komen et al., 2021).

Studies that analyzed the safety and efficacy of medications in other common problems in older patients were also included in this Research Topic. Two studies (Huang et al.; Yang et al.) estimated the efficacy of propofol in adult or older patients with different conditions. Two systematics reviews (Huang et al.; Zhang et al.) studied the efficacy and safety of drug use in secondary care. Gao et al. conducted a network meta-analysis to summarize all available evidence about relative effectiveness of different pharmacotherapy of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. Yu et al. conducted a cross-sectional study, analyzing the trends in the topical prescription’s treatment of old patients with dry eye disease.

Optimizing the use of medications is increasingly recognized as an important pillar in the health care of older people. Collectively, this Research Topic highlights pertinent concerns related to the safe use of medications in this age group and promotes awareness of optimizing older adults’ medication regimens. The results demonstrate that improving the quality of medication use and medication safety are still important challenges for healthcare professionals who care for older patients. Other initiatives are required for this field to reach its full potential of optimizing drug use in older patient to improve their health care outcomes within available resources.

Author Contributions

LL and FM contributed to the design and to the analysis of results. RB, MO, VP, and BG made additional analysis. All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Aggarwal, P., Woolford, S. J., and Patel, H. P. (2020). Multi-Morbidity and Polypharmacy in Older People: Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Practice. Geriatr. (Basel) 5 (4), 85. doi:10.3390/geriatrics5040085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khatter, A., Moriarty, F., Ashworth, M., Durbaba, S., and Redmond, P. (2021). Prevalence and Predictors of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Middle-Aged Adults: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 71 (708), e491–e497. doi:10.3399/BJGP.2020.1048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Komen, J. J., Pottegård, A., Mantel-Teeuwisse, A. K., Forslund, T., Hjemdahl, P., Wettermark, B., et al. (2021). Persistence and Adherence to Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation across Five Western European Countries. Europace 23 (11), 1722–1730. doi:10.1093/europace/euab091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MacBride-Stewart, S., McTaggart, S., Kurdi, A., Sneddon, J., McBurney, S., do Nascimento, R. C. R. M., et al. (2021). Initiatives and Reforms across Scotland in Recent Years to Improve Prescribing; Findings and Global Implications of Drug Prescriptions. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 14 (12), 2563–2586.

Google Scholar

Maher, R. L., Hanlon, J., and Hajjar, E. R. (2014). Clinical Consequences of Polypharmacy in Elderly. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 13 (1), 57–65. doi:10.1517/14740338.2013.827660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malmström, R. E., Godman, B. B., Diogene, E., Baumgärtel, C., Bennie, M., Bishop, I., et al. (2013). Dabigatran - a Case History Demonstrating the Need for Comprehensive Approaches to Optimize the Use of New Drugs. Front. Pharmacol. 4, 39. doi:10.3389/fphar.2013.00039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Motter, F. R., Cantuaria, N. M., and Lopes, L. C. (2021). Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices toward Deprescribing: A Protocol of Cross-Sectional Study (Desmedica Study-Brazil). BMJ Open 11 (8), e044312. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Motter, F. R., Fritzen, J. S., Hilmer, S. N., Paniz, É. V., and Paniz, V. M. V. (2018). Potentially Inappropriate Medication in the Elderly: A Systematic Review of Validated Explicit Criteria. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 74 (6), 679–700. doi:10.1007/s00228-018-2446-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Motter, F. R., Hilmer, S. N., and Paniz, V. M. V. (2019). Pain and Inflammation Management in Older Adults: A Brazilian Consensus of Potentially Inappropriate Medication and Their Alternative Therapies. Front. Pharmacol. 10, 1408. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.01408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mueller, T., Alvarez-Madrazo, S., Robertson, C., Wu, O., and Bennie, M. (2019). Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Clinical Practice in Scotland. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 85 (2), 422–431. doi:10.1111/bcp.13814

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nobili, A., Garattini, S., and Mannucci, P. M. (2011). Multiple Diseases and Polypharmacy in the Elderly: Challenges for the Internist of the Third Millennium. J. Comorb 1, 28–44. doi:10.15256/joc.2011.1.4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oliveira, M. G., Amorim, W. W., de Jesus, S. R., Rodrigues, V. A., and Passos, L. C. (2012). Factors Associated with Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use by the Elderly in the Brazilian Primary Care Setting. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 34 (4), 626–632. doi:10.1007/s11096-012-9656-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rochon, P. (2022). Drug Prescribing for Older Adults. UpToDate. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/drug-prescribing-for-older-adults.

Google Scholar

Shah, B. M., and Hajjar, E. R. (2012). Polypharmacy, Adverse Drug Reactions, and Geriatric Syndromes. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 28 (2), 173–186. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2012.01.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2021). Ageing and Health. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (Accessed May 03, 2022)

Xu, Z., Liang, X., Zhu, Y., Lu, Y., Ye, Y., Fang, L., et al. (2021). Factors Associated with Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions and Barriers to Medicines Optimisation Among Older Adults in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review. Fam. Med. Community Health 9 (4), e001325. doi:10.1136/fmch-2021-001325

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: drug safety, adverse drug reactions, medication without harm, older patients, deprescribing, potentially inappropriate medications

Citation: Lopes LC, Benko R, Oliveira MG, Paniz VMV, Godman B and Motter FR (2022) Editorial: Evidence for Assessing Drug Safety and Drug Use in Older People. Front. Pharmacol. 13:941813. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.941813

Received: 11 May 2022; Accepted: 17 May 2022;
Published: 01 June 2022.

Edited and reviewed by:

Jean-Marie Boeynaems, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium

Copyright © 2022 Lopes, Benko, Oliveira, Paniz, Godman and Motter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Luciane Cruz Lopes, Luslopesbr@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.