Manish Pandey
Varun Narayan Mishra
Maya Kumari4
Saeid Janizadeh
Romulus Costache- 1Marwadi University Research Center (MURC), Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
- 2Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
- 3Amity Institute of Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing (AIGIRS), Amity University, Noida, India
- 4Amity School of Natural Resources and Sustainable Development (ASNRSD), Amity University, Noida, India
- 5Department of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering and Water Resources Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States
- 6Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transilvania University of Braşov (UUNITBV), Braşov, Romania
- 7National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Bucharest, Romania
- 8Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea, Romania
Editorial on the Research Topic
Advanced geospatial data analytics for environmental sustainability: current practices and future prospects
1 Introduction
Environmental sustainability involves utilizing natural resources without compromising future needs and requires balancing ecological, social, and economic goals (Hariram et al., 2023). Growing global concern stems from intensified human–environment interactions and accelerating climatic pressures linked to urbanization and industrialization (Purvis et al., 2019; Terra dos Santos et al., 2023). Shifts in precipitation, increased evapotranspiration, and extreme weather events highlight the urgency for research supporting climate-resilient societies. Advances in geospatial technologies have transformed environmental monitoring and decision-making. Remote sensing, GIS, LiDAR, and UAVs enable the acquisition and analysis of large earth observation datasets to assess spatiotemporal changes in natural systems (Lee and Kang, 2015). These tools now support modeling, visualization, and prediction of climate-driven processes, offering improved projections of environmental phenomena and socio-economic change.
The rapid growth of earth observation data, combined with artificial intelligence (AI), is expanding opportunities for advanced environmental analytics. Big geospatial data supports real-time monitoring, interactive visualization, and improved decision support. Its integration into environmental sustainability research enables the identification of spatial patterns, drivers of change, and system vulnerabilities. Applications span land and water resource management, climate action planning, agriculture, and public health. Despite these advances, challenges remain. Data heterogeneity, imbalance, uncertainty, and computational constraints undermine model generalization and interoperability (Lee and Kang, 2015). Ethical and privacy concerns are increasing as high-resolution and real-time sensing expand. The computational footprint of large AI models and the opaque “black-box” nature of machine learning introduce additional risks. Innovations such as large language models, explainable AI, semantic modeling, advanced data fusion, synthetic data generation, metaverse environments, and knowledge graphs offer potential solutions for improving transparency, scalability, and responsible data use.
This Research Topic highlights how integrated geospatial and computational methods can strengthen environmental sustainability, reflecting a shift toward data-driven, interdisciplinary, and anticipatory approaches. The compiled contributions encourage policymakers, researchers, and practitioners to leverage emerging geospatial intelligence for sustainable development.
2 Current practices
Earth observation (EO) forms the foundation of environmental monitoring and informed decision-making. Current applications integrate satellite remote sensing, GIS, and predictive modeling to support biodiversity conservation, land-use planning, hazard mitigation, and sustainable resource management (Abebe et al., 2022; Maheswarappa et al., 2023; Tesfaye et al., 2024). Three major categories dominate current practice: monitoring via EO, predictive modeling for risk management, and biodiversity and ecosystem assessment. Monitoring land use and land cover (LULC) changes is one of the most established applications. Forest loss, biomass dynamics, and canopy structure can be quantified using multispectral and radar datasets such as Landsat, Sentinel, and LiDAR (Chang et al., 2021; Nyland et al., 2018). Built-up indices such as NDBI support urbanization assessment, while NDVI and EVI are widely used for agriculture monitoring and yield prediction. EO also supports water and soil resource monitoring, for example, through MODIS- or Landsat-derived evapotranspiration products and hyperspectral datasets for soil nutrient mapping (Huang et al., 2025).
Predictive modeling extends monitoring by integrating EO-derived variables with machine learning and statistical models to assess environmental risks. Flood, drought, wildfire, landslide, and avalanche susceptibility analyses increasingly rely on DEMs, climate data, and remote sensing-based indices (Ikematsu et al., 2024; Padilha et al., 2024). Techniques such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, and AHP support the identification of vulnerable regions and enhance early-warning capacities. EO technologies are also central to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation. Habitat suitability models using EO-based variables help identify priority conservation areas (Bilal, 2025; Chan et al., 2024; Gomes and Cardoso, 2025; Zhou et al., 2024). Wildlife monitoring benefits from multi-sensor integration, including satellite tracking, UAV observations, and camera traps (Rojas et al., 2024). Tools such as InVEST enable mapping of ecosystem services, including carbon storage, hydrological regulation, and urban cooling, while also informing conservation strategies addressing habitat fragmentation, invasive species, and poaching pressures (Jha et al., 2025; Reddy et al., 2024).
3 Summary of published articles in this Research Topic
This Research Topic, Advanced Geospatial Data Analytics for Environmental Sustainability: Current Practices and Future Prospects, includes seven research papers demonstrating cutting-edge applications of geospatial technologies, remote sensing, and advanced computational intelligence—including machine learning and fog computing - to address pressing environmental challenges such as resource sustainability, hazard prediction, ecological health, and infrastructure modernization. Based on nature of the manuscripts, we have divided the contributions into four groups/subsections as follows.
3.1 Geospatial Artificial Intelligence for environmental modeling
The first thematic group highlights the use of Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) to improve environmental prediction, particularly for water-related systems.
Elmotawakkil et al. advanced groundwater recharge modeling in arid environments using a tabular deep learning approach in the Feija Basin, Morocco. Their method integrated ten remote sensing–derived conditioning factors, including elevation, slope, and rainfall, with five AI models—TabNet, TabTransformer, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), CatBoost, and AdaBoost. TabNet performed best, achieving 97.8% accuracy and an AUC of 0.99, followed by TabTransformer (97.6%), demonstrating the strong potential of deep learning for groundwater recharge prediction—critical for designing artificial recharge and rainwater harvesting practices. Similarly, Lakra et al. evaluated machine learning models for soil moisture estimation across wheat fields using Sentinel-1 SAR backscatter and in situ observations. Random Forest (RF) performed best with an RMSE of 7.06% and R2 of 0.61 (correlation: 0.8), followed by the CNN model (RMSE: 8.44%; R2: 0.43; correlation: 0.67). The study demonstrates the viability of ML–SAR fusion in soil moisture mapping to support agricultural water management.
3.2 Remote sensing applications for ecosystem and hazard monitoring
This section focuses on remote sensing–based assessment of wildfire danger and harmful algal blooms.
Sultan et al. modeled wildfire hazard in the Vellore Reserve Forest (Tamil Nadu, India) using MODIS and Landsat-based indices including NDVI, NDMI, and dNBR. Results showed human activity as the dominant risk driver, with activity danger scores ranging from 0 to 12,000. A weather danger index indicated high risk (345–348) during the May–July dry season. The generated hazard maps serve as essential tools for fire-risk mitigation and monitoring. Evans et al. applied Planet Labs multispectral imagery and K-means clustering to monitor cyanobacteria blooms in Darlings Lake, New Brunswick. Using NDVI and NDCI time-series analysis, the study confirmed NDCI as a more reliable bloom indicator, with a strong linear relationship between NDCI and in situ phycocyanin concentrations (R2 = 0.893). The approach offers a reliable framework for rapid harmful algal bloom detection and lake management.
3.3 Geospatial planning and sustainability assessment
This theme includes studies employing geospatial tools and multi-criteria analysis for waste management planning and habitat sustainability evaluation.
Aguiñaga-Vallejo et al. developed a decision-support framework for optimal solid waste disposal site selection in Guayas, Ecuador, integrating the Gravity Center of Waste Production (GCWP) with AHP-GIS analysis. Water resource protection emerged as the highest-priority factor, and three inter-municipal partnerships were proposed to reduce operational costs while improving environmental compliance. Xu et al. analyzed habitat quality dynamics in Guilin City, China, between 2001 and 2022 using the InVEST model and Geographically Weighted Regression. Average habitat quality measured 0.59, with 47.98% categorized as good to excellent, but overall trends declined. Spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I > 0.8) showed strong clustering, while elevation was identified as the most influential driver. Dual-factor interactions contributed more strongly to habitat variation than individual variables, emphasizing the complex nature of ecological degradation.
3.4 Technological innovations in environmental sensing infrastructure
Kazem et al. addressed operational shortcomings in traditional environmental observatories through the incorporation of Fog Computing. Based on surveys across German and French observatory networks (OZCAR, RZA, TERENO), the study suggests shifting from cloud-dependent systems to localized edge-processing. Fog computing enhances resilience, supports intermittent power supply, and improves adaptive sampling, enabling long-term, real-time environmental monitoring.
4 Future directions
Over the next decade, geospatial analytics will increasingly integrate Geospatial Big Data, AI, and real-time sensing systems to support Sustainable Development Goals (Pandiyan et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2024). Future systems will fuse satellite, LiDAR, IoT, and citizen-science inputs for predictive modeling of climate change impacts, biodiversity loss, and resource decline (Annoni et al., 2023; Ali et al., 2024; Su et al., 2025). Emerging trends include global, trustworthy Explainable AI (XAI), edge intelligence for remote observatories (Kazem et al.,) and operational-scale modeling for smart cities and conservation (Jiménez Rios et al., 2024; Quek et al., 2024; Xu et al.). Quantum computing may eventually transform environmental modeling, advancing global-scale sustainability science.
Author contributions
MP: Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. VM: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. MK: Writing – review and editing. SJ: Writing – review and editing. RC: Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to their respective institutions and departments for the facilities needed while working on this project.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The authors declare use of Generative AI (Perplexity, Microsoft CoPilot) solely for language editing and grammatical refinement so that readability and interpretability can be enhanced. AI was not utilized for conceptual/intellectual content creation in the article.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abebe, G., Getachew, D., and Ewunetu, A. (2022). Analysing land use/land cover changes and its dynamics using remote sensing and GIS in gubalafito district, northeastern Ethiopia. SN Appl. Sci. 4 (1), 30. doi:10.1007/s42452-021-04915-8
Annoni, A., Nativi, S., Çöltekin, A., Desha, C., Eremchenko, E., Gevaert, C. M., et al. (2024). Digital earth: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Int. J. Digit. Earth.16 , 1022–1072. doi:10.1080/17538947.2023.2187467
Ali, M. E., Cheema, M. A., Hashem, T., Ulhaq, A., and Babar, M. A. (2024). Enabling spatial digital twins: technologies, challenges, and future research directions. J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. GIScience. 92, 761–778. doi:10.1007/S41064-024-00301-2
Bilal, M. (2025). Spectral indices alone are not enough: a critical assessment of pre-fire wildfire risk mapping. Ecol. Inf. 91, 103435. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103435
Chan, C. C., Alvi, S. A., Zhou, X., Durrani, S., Wilson, N., and Yebra, M. (2024). A survey on IoT ground sensing systems for early wildfire detection: technologies, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Access 12, 172785–172819. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3501336
Chang, X., Zhang, F., Cong, K., and Liu, X. (2021). Scenario simulation of land use and land cover change in mining area. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 12910. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92299-5
Gomes, P. P., and Cardoso, T. (2025). AI-Driven wildfire prediction and response in Portugal. igi-global.Com., 115–144. doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7483-2.ch005
Hariram, N. P., Mekha, K. B., Suganthan, V., and Sudhakar, K. (2023). Sustainalism: an integrated socio-economic-environmental model to address sustainable development and sustainability. Sustainability 15 (13), 10682. doi:10.3390/su151310682
Huang, J., Sehgal, V., Alvarez, L. V., Brocca, L., Cai, S., Cheng, R., et al. (2025). Remotely sensed high-resolution soil moisture and evapotranspiration: bridging the gap between science and society. Water Resour. Res. 61 (5), e2024WR037929. doi:10.1029/2024WR037929
Ikematsu, P., Portes, B. C. N., Pavani, B. F., de Abreu Marques, M. G., Filho, W. M., de Sousa, W. C., et al. (2024). Models, tools, and instruments for ecosystem services assessment and support for decision-making process in a macrometropolitan scale. Springer Sci. Bus. Media Deutschl. GmbH F3222, 341–354. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-59611-7_23
Jha, G., Debangshi, U., Palla, S., Nazrul, F., Dey, S., Dutta, W., et al. (2025). Precision agriculture technologies for climate-resiliency and water resource management. Springer, 351–381. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-76532-2_15
Jiménez Rios, A., Petrou, M. L., Ramirez, R., Plevris, V., and Nogal, M. (2024). Industry 5.0, towards an enhanced built cultural heritage conservation practice. J. Build. Eng. 96. doi:10.1016/J.JOBE.2024.110542
Lee, J.-G., and Kang, M. (2015). Geospatial big data: challenges and opportunities. Big Data Res. 2 (2), 74–81. doi:10.1016/j.bdr.2015.01.003
Maheswarappa, A., Ahmed, S. A., and Harishnaika, N. (2023). Land use and land cover classification using machine learning algorithms in google Earth engine. Earth Sci. Inf. 16 (4), 3057–3073. doi:10.1007/s12145-023-01073-w
Nyland, K. E., Gunn, G. I., Shiklomanov, N. N., Engstrom, R., and Streletskiy, A. (2018). Land cover change in the lower yenisei river using dense stacking of landsat imagery in google Earth engine. Remote Sens. 10 (8), 1226. doi:10.3390/rs10081226
Padilha, J., Carvalho-Santos, C., Cássio, F., and Pascoal, C. (2024). Land cover implications on ecosystem service delivery: a multi-scenario study of trade-offs and synergies in river basins. Environ. Manag. 73 (4), 753–768. doi:10.1007/s00267-023-01916-8
Pandiyan, P., Saravanan, S., Kannadasan, R., Krishnaveni, S., Alsharif, M. H., and Kim, M. K. (2024). A comprehensive review of advancements in green IoT for smart grids: paving the path to sustainability. Energy Rep. 11, 5504–5531. doi:10.1016/J.EGYR.2024.05.021
Purvis, B., Mao, Y., and Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustain. Sci. 14 (3), 681–695. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
Quek, H. Y., Hofmeister, M., Rihm, S. D., Yan, J., Lai, J., Brownbridge, G., et al. (2024). Dynamic knowledge graph applications for augmented built environments through “The World Avatar.”. J. Build. Eng. 91. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109507
Reddy, C. S., Satish, K. V., Saranya, K. R. L., Sri Surya, N. N., Neha, P. A., and Rajashekar, G. (2024). Harnessing essential biodiversity variables and remote sensing of Earth observations - synthesizing biodiversity insights. Spatial Inf. Res. 32 (3), 265–276. doi:10.1007/s41324-023-00558-6
Rojas, C., Clerici, N., Longo, M., and Ruiz-Agudelo, C. (2024). Integrative framework for analyzing ecosystem services multifunctionality in watershed planning: case study of the coello river basin, Colombia. Int. J. River Basin Manag., 1–11. doi:10.1080/15715124.2024.2416030
Su, F., Yan, F., Wu, W., Fu, D., Cao, Y., Lyne, V., et al. (2025). Advancing intelligent geography: Current status, innovations, and future prospects. Geogr. Sustain. 6 , 100375. doi:10.1016/J.GEOSUS.2025.100375
Terra dos Santos, L. C., Frimaio, A., Giannetti, B. F., Agostinho, F., Liu, G., and Almeida, C. M. V. B. (2023). Integrating environmental, social, and economic dimensions to monitor sustainability in the G20 countries. Sustainability 15 (8), 6502. doi:10.3390/su15086502
Tesfaye, W., Elias, E., Warkineh, B., Tekalign, M., and Abebe, G. (2024). Modeling of land use and land cover changes using google Earth engine and machine learning approach: implications for landscape management. Environ. Syst. Res. 13 (1), 1–16. doi:10.1186/S40068-024-00366-3/TABLES/5
Wu, J., Gan, W., Chao, H. C., and Yu, P. S. (2024). Geospatial big data: survey and challenges. IEEE J. Sel. Top Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 17, 17007–17020. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3438376
Keywords: climate change, cloudcomputing, geoAI, geoenvironmental modeling, satellites, SDG, spectral indices, UAVs
Citation: Pandey M, Mishra VN, Kumari M, Janizadeh S and Costache R (2026) Editorial: Advanced geospatial data analytics for environmental sustainability: current practices and future prospects. Front. Remote Sens. 6:1761905. doi: 10.3389/frsen.2025.1761905
Received: 06 December 2025; Accepted: 16 December 2025;
Published: 07 January 2026.
Edited and reviewed by:
Biswajeet Pradhan, University of Technology Sydney, AustraliaCopyright © 2026 Pandey, Mishra, Kumari, Janizadeh and Costache. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Varun Narayan Mishra, dmFydW45Njg2QGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==