ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Res. Metr. Anal.

Sec. Scholarly Communication

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1531467

This article is part of the Research TopicEvaluating Supervision and Research Leadership in Promoting Responsible ResearchView all 3 articles

A Roadmap to Good Practice for Training Supervisors and Leadership: A European Perspective

Provisionally accepted
Seán  LaceySeán Lacey1*Tamarinde  HavenTamarinde Haven2Rita  SantosRita Santos3Tom  FarrellyTom Farrelly1Máiréad  MurrayMáiréad Murray4Panagiotis  KavourasPanagiotis Kavouras5
  • 1Munster Technological University, Cork, Ireland
  • 2Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
  • 3Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 4Health Services Executive, Cork, Ireland
  • 5National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Purpose: Supervision and leadership are regarded to have a major role in promoting responsible research. Various approaches to training for supervisors and leaders have been proposed. However, little is known about what works best, what kind of hurdles are faced in implementation and engagement, and what methods of assessing the effectiveness of training programmes are available. Through exploring these points, this research aims to propose a roadmap to good practice for training supervisors and leadership.Design: A virtual marketplace for exchanging current practices and approaches for training supervisors and leadership took place in March 2024. Twenty-two policy makers from thirteen European countries, supervisors and senior research leaders were selected to participate, using opportunistic and purposive sampling. Facilitated using the Gather platform, the marketplace commenced with a non-European keynote speaker on training supervisors and leadership. Three main questions were brought forward for discussion separately - What works well for successful implementation? What are the challenges? How do we assess effectiveness? After the keynote presentation, marketplace participants rotated in groups between three market stalls to share thoughts on good practices for training supervisors and leadership framed around the three questions. Moderators for each of the stalls recorded detailed field notes to inform the study findings. Findings: During the exchange, mandatory training, especially when tailored to specific disciplines and conducted in small groups using a problem-based learning approach, was deemed effective. Awareness of power imbalances between early career researchers, supervisors, and leaders were to the fore. Critical challenges included a need for senior supervisors and leaders to participate and support research training. Also a need for systemic processes, tailored to specific local settings to avoid ad hoc implementation of policies, procedures and training. In assessing effectiveness there was an emphasis to share more research data and to utilise incidents of breaches of research integrity. The latter to be leveraged for learning purposes and transparency around the investigative process.Originality: There are multiple facets to good practice for training supervisors and leadership, along with a multitude of practices, however there is little evidence of practices that work, challenges around implementation, and assessing effectiveness.

Keywords: Training Supervisors, Leadership, research integrity, Open Science, Research culture

Received: 20 Nov 2024; Accepted: 27 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lacey, Haven, Santos, Farrelly, Murray and Kavouras. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Seán Lacey, Munster Technological University, Cork, Ireland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.