ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Res. Metr. Anal.
Sec. Research Methods
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1553208
This article is part of the Research TopicIndigenous Research Methodologies and Research at the InterfaceView all 4 articles
Indigenous Rights-Based Approaches to Decolonising Research Methodologies in Settler Colonial Contexts
Provisionally accepted- 1Griffith University, Nathan, Australia
- 2Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- 3Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- 4The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- 5Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- 6James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- 7Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- 8International Christian University, Mitaka, Tōkyō, Japan
- 9Waseda University, Tokyo, Tōkyō, Japan
- 10Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction -Indigenous knowledge and perspectives continue to be misrepresented and misunderstood in settler colonial states, including within academic circles. This is particularly the case in the field of research, where non-Indigenous researchers continue to design and conduct research in their field of expertise without appropriate collaboration and guidance from Indigenous experts. Method -We explore the Indigenous rights-based approach (IRBA) as a means of decolonising research methodologies, focussing on the Australian context as a case study, where an Aboriginal Australian higher education expert has worked in a dyadic relationship with one Aboriginal and 16 non-Aboriginal subject experts to develop their knowledge, skills, and understanding of how to employ IBRA in their research. After working collaboratively, it became possible to analyse the similarities and differences in the use of IBRA across various fields of study. Results -Our analysis reveals five key aspects that were revealed during the implementation of the Indigenous rights-based approach: 1) Indigenous People as Data, 2) Protocols of engagement, 3) Privileging Indigenous Knowledge Systems, 4) Community Benefit, and 5) Tackling Doctoral Research Training. Discussion -We found that an Indigenous rights-based approach is crucial for decolonising research in settler colonial states such as Australia. Working in a dyadic partnership between an Indigenous higher education expert and academic researchers across several disciplines, we have seen an emergent approach to researching with Indigenous Peoples that allows non-Aboriginal researchers to work with Indigenous people in a manner that is ethical, relevant, and significant for Indigenous communities, contributing to place-based reconciliation and Indigenous community empowerment. Conclusion -We recommend how non-Indigenous researchers can collaborate with their universities to successfully implement an IRBA. Critically, this will require each university to employ Indigenous higher education experts who will lead and support professional development in research with non-Aboriginal people and communities. This will require a fundamental shift in how research is conceptualised, conducted, and disseminated.
Keywords: Indigenous rights-based research, decolonisation, research methodologies, Education, settler colonialism, indigenous knowledge, Indigenous people as data, protocols of engagement
Received: 30 Dec 2024; Accepted: 17 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Anderson, Diamond, Pham, Beaza Peña, Tapia, Blue, Saward, Hurley, Pecar, Kelly, Forbes, Cathcart, Sato, Maeda, Fox, Goerke, Diamond and Howe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Peter Anderson, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.