ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Soil Sci.
Sec. Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Carbon Sequestration
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsoil.2025.1549302
This article is part of the Research TopicSoil Organic Matter for Global Soil Health and DecarbonizationView all 9 articles
THE EFFECTS OF AGRONOMIC PRACTICES ON SOIL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN MAIZE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN BUEA, CAMEROON
Provisionally accepted- 1International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia
- 2Department of Education, Government of Manitoba, Canada, Manitoba, Canada
- 3Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, University of Buea, Cameroon., Buea, Cameroon
- 4Department of Agronomic and Applied Molecular Sciences, University of Buea, Cameroon., Buea, Cameroon
- 5University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland, United States
- 6International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (Mexico), Texcoco, Tabasco, Mexico
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
With a specific focus on zero tillage and organic fertilization, this study examines the effects of agronomic practices on soil greenhouse gas (GHGs—CO2, N2O, and CH4) emissions, global warming potential (GWP), maize productivity and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) over two growing seasons (2020 minor and 2021 main season) in Buea, Cameroon. Two tillage practices–i.e., zero-tillage and conventional tillage with ridge formation and three fertilizer treatments—i.e., no fertilizer, synthetic fertilizer (urea), and organic fertilizer (composted municipal solid waste), were factorially combined in a split-plot design with three replications. The hybrid maize cultivar CMS 8704 was used. GHG emissions were measured using the static flux chamber method, and flux rates were calculated with the HMR package in R software. Results showed that tillage and fertilizer types significantly (p<0.05) influenced seasonal cumulative CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions. Synthetic fertilizer treatments produced the highest cumulative N₂O emissions, particularly under zero-tillage in 2020 and conventional tillage in 2021. Conventional tillage paired with organic fertilizer yielded the highest CO₂ emissions across both seasons, while methane fluxes were low and largely negative across treatments, indicating CH₄ sinks. Application of synthetic fertilizer increased GWP by 20% and 322% under zero tillage in the 2020 and 2021 seasons, respectively. Under conventional tillage, GWP decreased by 15% in 2020 but sharply increased by 295% in 2021, highlighting season-specific effects. Although treatment effects were not significant (P>0.05) on maize yields in 2020, the highest yield (3.06 t/ha) occurred under conventional tillage without fertilization. Fertilizer type and its interaction with tillage significantly (P<0.05) influenced yields in 2021, with the highest yield under conventional tillage with synthetic fertilization (6.15 tons/ha). However, conventional tillage treatment without fertilization produced the highest yield (3.06 t/ha) in 2020 and the lowest GHGI (12.04 kg CO₂-eq t⁻¹). In 2021, zero tillage treatment without fertilization resulted in a high yield (5.56 t/ha) with the lowest GHGI (2.15 kg CO₂-eq t⁻¹). The results suggest that in Buea’s minor growing season, conventional tillage with or without organic fertilization reduced GHG emissions without compromising yields, while in main seasons, zero tillage without fertilization offered the most favorable yield-emission balance.
Keywords: Greenhouse gas emissions, Global warming potential, conservation agriculture, Zero tillage practices, organic fertilizer, maize production systems, Greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI)
Received: 20 Dec 2024; Accepted: 21 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 George Amenchwi, Nikièma, Manga, Tening, Olufemi and Tek Bahadur. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Amahnui George Amenchwi, g.amahnui@cgiar.org
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.