ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Soil Sci.

Sec. Plant-Soil Interactions

Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsoil.2025.1630385

This article is part of the Research TopicCarbon and Nitrogen in Mitigating and Adapting Agriculture to Climate ChangeView all articles

Trade-offs of tropical cover crops: enhanced carbon inputs and soybean yield offset higher N2O emissions

Provisionally accepted
Victória  Santos SouzaVictória Santos Souza1*Mariana  Teixeira BorgesMariana Teixeira Borges2Bruna  Emanuelle SchiebelbeinBruna Emanuelle Schiebelbein1Lucas  Pecci CanisaresLucas Pecci Canisares1Jorge  Luiz LocatelliJorge Luiz Locatelli3Larissa  De Souza BortoloLarissa De Souza Bortolo4Darliane  De Castro SantosDarliane De Castro Santos2Leandro  Pereira PachecoLeandro Pereira Pacheco5Carlos  CerriCarlos Cerri1Maurício  Roberto CherubinMaurício Roberto Cherubin1
  • 1Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
  • 2Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology Goiano,, Rio Verde, Brazil
  • 3Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States
  • 4Foundation Mato Grosso,, Rondonópolis, Brazil
  • 5Federal University of Rondonópolis (UFR), Rondonopolis, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

In tropical agriculture, cover crops are increasingly adopted to improve soil health and system resilience. However, their influence on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly nitrous oxide (N2O), remains underexplored in field conditions. We evaluated how cover crop biomass affects N2O emissions and emission intensity (kg CO₂ eq t⁻¹ grain) in tropical soybean systems across two field experiments (6 and 10 years) in the Brazilian savannah (Cerrado biome). GHG were measured using static chambers on a weekly basis throughout the cropping seasons from 2022 to 2024. Soybeans followed by cover crops such as MixCC (Ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis), Millet (Pennisetum glaucum), and Showy rattlebox (Crotalaria spectabilis)) and Ruzigrass contributed up to 202% more nitrogen and 51% more carbon inputs than soybeans followed by fallow and Maize. The cover crop mix emitted ~6,000 kg C ha⁻¹ as biogenic CO2 in two years, and 2,655 g N ha⁻¹ as N2O, ~50%-fold more than the fallow bare. Nevertheless, although high-biomass systems increased N2O emissions during the off-season, they also enhanced soybean yield, leading to lower emission intensity. The structural equation model revealed that cover crop biomass had a direct positive effect on soybean yield (standardized coefficient = 0.67) and N2O emissions (standardized coefficient =0.33), but also an indirect negative effect on emission intensity through yield compensation. These findings suggest that adopting cover cropping systems in tropical regions can efficiently contribute to increasing crop yields while improving nitrogen use efficiency, which is important for food security in these regions.

Keywords: GHG emissions, Emissions intensity, Cerrado, Structural Equation Modeling, Soil health

Received: 17 May 2025; Accepted: 07 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Santos Souza, Teixeira Borges, Schiebelbein, Pecci Canisares, Locatelli, De Souza Bortolo, Santos, Pereira Pacheco, Cerri and Cherubin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Victória Santos Souza, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.