SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Surg.

Sec. Surgical Oncology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1477301

Effect of simple versus extended cholecystectomy on prognosis of T1b gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Hongpeng  GuHongpeng Gu1Guoqiang  ZhangGuoqiang Zhang2Haijie  MaHaijie Ma2*Ze  YuZe Yu2*
  • 1Zhenjiang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 2Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background & Aims: Extended cholecystectomy (EC) is recommended for T1b gallbladder cancer (GBC), but the optimal surgical procedure for T1b GBC remains controversial. This study aims to compare the prognosis of T1b GBC patients who underwent simple cholecystectomy (SC) versus EC from a long-term survival perspective.We performed a systematic search up to August 06, 2024, using MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). We evaluated the quality of the studies included and the risk of bias, calculated the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and DSS and conducted the sensitivity analysis.Results: A total of 8 retrospective studies involving 2,097 T1b GBC patients (SC = 1,263, EC = 408) were included. The pooled result of OS showed that the EC group had a significantly better OS than the SC group (pooled HR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.59-0.89; P = 0.002). The pooled result of DSS indicated that EC significantly improved DSS of T1b GBC compared to SC (pooled HR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.29-0.77; P = 0.003).Conclusions: EC should be chosen as the optimal surgical procedure for patients with T1b GBC from the standpoint of long-term postoperative survival. However, further analysis of more comprehensive studies will be necessary in the future to improve the quality of evidence.

Keywords: gallbladder cancer, Simple cholecystectomy, Extended cholecystectomy, prognosis, Meta-analysis

Received: 07 Aug 2024; Accepted: 13 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Gu, Zhang, Ma and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Haijie Ma, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
Ze Yu, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.