ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg.

Sec. Surgical Oncology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1610561

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Surgical Techniques and ML/DL-based Prognostic Biomarkers for Surgical and Adjuvant Therapies of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic CancersView all 3 articles

Novel Modified Blumgart Anastomosis Reduces Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Retrospective Study Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting

Provisionally accepted
Lin  YeLin Ye1*Wanrong  YueWanrong Yue2Zhiyuan  JianZhiyuan Jian1Jun  WengJun Weng1Qingrong  MoQingrong Mo1Renjian  LiRenjian Li1Hao  ShiHao Shi1Haozhe  ZhouHaozhe Zhou3Yaqun  YuYaqun Yu1*
  • 1Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
  • 2Guilin People’s hospital, Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China
  • 3Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has remained the standard surgical procedure for treating benign and malignant lesions of the pancreatic head and periampullary region since it was first performed by Italian surgeon Codivilla in 1898 [1,2]. Gastrointestinal tract reconstruction following PD represents one of the most challenging aspects of the procedure and significantly influences patient recovery. While surgical mortality rates have decreased to below 5% over the past two decades [3][4][5]. However, due to its complexity and intricate reconstruction steps, the postoperative complication rate remains high ranging from 30 % to 60 % [6][7][8][9].Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) represents a particularly concerning complication following PD. Despite not being the most frequent complication, clinically relevant POPF(CR-POPF) can significantly prolong hospitalization, increase healthcare costs, and potentially trigger life-threatening complications including post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage and intra-abdominal abscesses. Consequently, prevention and management of pancreatic fistula have become priorities in perioperative care [10].In 2002, Blumgart from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center developed an innovative pancreaticojejunostomy(PJ) technique for open PD that demonstrated promising clinical outcomes [11,12]. This approach has since been recognized as one of the safest anastomotic methods following PD [13,14]. inspiring various modifications across specialized pancreatic centers worldwide. However, consensus regarding the optimal modified Blumgart technique remains elusive.In response to this challenge, we implemented a novel modified Blumgart PJ technique featuring an anchoring approach and omental reinforcement for open PD [15][16][17][18]. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of our modified technique compared to conventional PJ in reducing CR-POPF incidence. Secondary outcomes include operative duration, postoperative recovery, and mortality rates. To mitigate the inherent limitations of retrospective analysis, we employed inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics between groups [19].

Keywords: Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Pancreaticojejunostomy, Blumgart anastomosis, Postoperative pancreatic fistula, Inverse probability of treatment weighting

Received: 12 Apr 2025; Accepted: 05 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ye, Yue, Jian, Weng, Mo, Li, Shi, Zhou and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Lin Ye, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
Yaqun Yu, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.