Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg.

Sec. Visceral Surgery

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1628956

Development and Validation of a Practical Prediction Model for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis using Machine Learning

Provisionally accepted
Tianyu  DeTianyu De1Guohui  DuGuohui Du2Hongkun  YinHongkun Yin2Hao  WangHao Wang2*Wei  WangWei Wang1Tian  MaTian Ma1Junbai  MaJunbai Ma3Qi  WangQi Wang1*Hao  WangHao Wang4*
  • 1General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
  • 2School of Clinical Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
  • 3School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Chile
  • 4Department of Pathogenic Biology and Medical Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is one most frequent and severe complication of ERCP. In consideration of recent advancements in both endoscopic and artificial intelligence research, it is possible to construct a practical risk prediction model to facilitate the identification of PEP patients at elevated risk. Aim: We developed and validated a concise predictive model for post-ERCP pancreatitis risk with logistic regression (LR), LightGBM, Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network models. Methods: We selected 688 patients undergone ERCP to form the basic dataset, with 70% for training and 30% for validation. Subsequently, Stepwise Backward Selection Based on Logistic Regression was utilized to select pertinent clinical features, incorporating the machine learning (ML) models to construct the final predictive model. The efficacy of the model was evaluated by various metrics. These newly identified clinical features were then incorporated into a simplified, points-based risk scoring system for potential bedside application and further evaluation. Results: Based on the collected data and the results of stepwise backward regression, we identified the following features as potentially significant clinical variables that influence the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: periampullary diverticulum, pancreatic stent placement, pancreatic guidewire passages, dilation of the extrahepatic bile duct, age, and coronary artery disease, and constructed a prediction model. Following this, several ML models were constructed to assess the performance of this model. All ML models demonstrated superior performance to conventional logistic regression (LR) models in terms of AUC curves, with XGBoost, SVM, LightGBM, and MLP models all achieving at least acceptable performance levels. Finally, we developed a simplified scoring system based on LightGBM model with an AUC of 0.75. Conclusions: We developed and validated a concise predictive model for post-ERCP pancreatitis risk, and a simplified scoring system based on the LightGBM model. This model facilitates individual risk prediction and preventive strategy selection.

Keywords: Post-ERCP pancreatitis, artificial intelligence, predictive model, machine learning, risk prediction

Received: 15 May 2025; Accepted: 03 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 De, Du, Yin, Wang, Wang, Ma, Ma, Wang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Hao Wang, wanghaograduate@126.com
Qi Wang, wq-6562@163.com
Hao Wang, wanghaograduate@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.