CLINICAL TRIAL article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Orthopedic Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1633670
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovations in Knee Preservation and Arthroplasty: Advancing Techniques and Technologies for Enhanced Surgical OutcomesView all 9 articles
Comparison of the therapeutic effects of three internal fixation methods for transverse fractures of the patella
Provisionally accepted- 1Shanghai Shidong Hospital of Yangpu District, Shanghai, China
- 2University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the treatment effects of three internal fixation methods, including tension band with K-wires, tension band with cannulated screws and tension band with ring-pins on transverse fractures of the patella. Methods: Patellar fracture patients treated in Shanghai Yangpu District Shidong Hospital from March 2016 to January 2023 were divided into three groups based on the internal fixation method: the ring-pins group (tension band with ring-pins), the K-wires group (tension band with K-wires), and the cannulated screws group (tension band with cannulated screws). Surgery duration, hemoglobin decrease, excellent rate of knee joint function evaluation at postoperative 3 months and 12 months, VAS scores before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery, postoperative complication rate, and removal rate of internal fixation were compared among the three groups of patients. Results: No significant differences were observed in operation time and the degree of hemoglobin decrease before and after operation among the three groups (P>0.05). There was a statistical difference in the excellent and good rate of Böstman's score among the three groups of patients 3 months after surgery (P<0.05). The excellent and good rates of knee joint scores in the ring-pins group and the cannulated screws group in 3 months after surgery were higher than in the K-wires group, and no significant differences were observed in the excellent and good rates of Böstman's score among the three groups at 12 months after surgery (P>0.05). No significant differences were observed in VAS scores across groups before and after surgery (P>0.05). The VAS scores at 3 months and 12 months after surgery were lower than those before surgery (P<0.001). Significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications (P<0.05) and hardware removal rates (P<0.001) among the three groups. The ring-pins group and the cannulated screws group had fewer postoperative complications than the K-wires group. Conclusion: Compared with K-wires and cannulated screws, ring-pins have the advantages of wide application range, low postoperative complication rate, and easy removal of implants. Treatment experience, low surgical complexity, and good postoperative knee joint function recovery have obvious clinical application value.
Keywords: tension band with ring-pins, Cannulated screws, transverse fractures of the patella, internal fixation, fractures abstract, Surgery
Received: 23 May 2025; Accepted: 17 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li and Du. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kewei Du, Shanghai Shidong Hospital of Yangpu District, Shanghai, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.