ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Orthopedic Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1644194
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Precision Medicine for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Pelvis/Hip Fractures: Integration of Digital and Intelligent TechnologiesView all 8 articles
Clinical efficacy analysis of anterior superior iliac spine 3D printed guide plate assisted sacroiliac screws in the treatment of pelvic fractures
Provisionally accepted- 1Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
- 2Gastroenterology Department, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
- 3Hand micrographic surgery, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
- 4Traumatic orthopedics, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous 3D-printed guides at the anterior anterior superior iliac spine site with traditional fluoroscopy-assisted sacroiliac screw implantation in the treatment of pelvic fractures. Methods: 40 patients with eligible pelvic fractures diagnosed and treated from December 2022 to May 2024 were collected and divided into 2 groups. The guide plate group used the anterior superior iliac spine 3D printed guide plate to assist the sacroiliac screws to fix the posterior pelvic ring fracture; the fluoroscopy group used fluoroscopic freehand placement of sacroiliac screws to fix the posterior pelvic ring fracture. The operative time, number of fluoroscopies, intraoperative bleeding, and length of incision for each screw implantation in the 2 groups were recorded. Fracture reduction was evaluated according to the Matta criteria, screw position was assessed by modified Gras classification, and statistical analysis was performed.Result: 40 patients were followed up for 6-12 months, with 23 sacroiliac screws implanted in 20 patients in the guide plate group and 25 sacroiliac screws implanted in 20 patients in the fluoroscopy group. The operative times were 50-75 (60.00±8.429) min and 50-90 (72.25±10.939) min (P<0.001) in the guide plate group and fluoroscopy group, respectively, the number of fluoroscopies was 7-18 (11.65±3.117) and 38-62 (48.05±7.258) (P< 0.001), and the intraoperative bleeding was 10-30 (16.60±5.642) mL and 5-20 (10.3±4.354) mL (P< 0.001).The Matta criteria scores for fracture repositioning in both groups were excellent and good (P=0.429). Modified Gras classification was used to assess screw positions: 19 in class I, 4 in class II, and 0 in class III in the guide plate group; 20 in class I, 4 in class II, and 1 in class III in the fluoroscopy group, and the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P=0.624). Conclusion: The anterior superior iliac spine 3D printing guide plate-assisted sacroiliac screw fixation of pelvic fracture compared with traditional fluoroscopy-assisted sacroiliac screw fixation of pelvic fracture can shorten the operation time, reduce the number of fluoroscopies, and improve the accuracy of implantation.
Keywords: Pelvic fracture, Sacroiliac screw, 3D printed guide plate, Fracture, 3D printed
Received: 10 Jun 2025; Accepted: 22 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Luo, Zhang, Li and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Dong Liu, mynameischen135@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.