SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1654354
Efficacy of Nasal Dressings and Applications for Postoperative Management Following Sinus Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted
- 1Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
- 2Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Postoperative complications such as crusting, synechiae, bleeding, and infection are common following sinus surgeries. Various local and systemic interventions have been proposed to optimize healing and improve patient outcomes, yet the comparative efficacy of these strategies remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of different postoperative applications, including nasal dressings, irrigation methods, topical medications, and systemic therapies, used after sinus surgeries. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to identify studies assessing postoperative interventions in patients undergoing nasal or sinus surgeries. A total of 30 studies comprising 30 randomized controlled trials were included. Interventions were categorized into four groups: nasal dressings, nasal irrigation, topical sprays/ointments, and systemic therapies. Outcomes such as endoscopic healing scores, crusting, synechiae formation, bleeding, infection, and patient-reported symptom scores (e.g., SNOT-22) were analyzed. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. Results: Nasal dressings, particularly bioabsorbable materials impregnated with corticosteroids or antibiotics, consistently improved mucosal healing and reduced crusting and synechiae formation. Buffered hypertonic and antiseptic nasal irrigation showed superior symptom relief and microbial clearance compared to isotonic saline. Topical therapies provided adjunctive benefits in reducing inflammation, while systemic therapies offered limited additional efficacy. Subgroup analyses indicated that intervention effectiveness varied by surgery type. Minimal publication bias was observed. Conclusion: This review highlights the superiority of locally applied, multimodal interventions for optimizing postoperative outcomes in nasal and sinus surgeries. Systemic therapies may be reserved for select indications. These findings support the need for tailored postoperative care protocols and the standardization of outcome measures in future clinical trials.
Keywords: Nasal surgery, Postoperative management, Nasal irrigation, Nasal dressings, metaanalysis
Received: 26 Jun 2025; Accepted: 13 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Wen, Xu, Shi, Kan and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Li Chen, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.