Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg.

Sec. Genitourinary Surgery and Interventions

The clinical efficacy of novel semirigid ureteroscopy with a vacuum suction device for treatment of > 10 mm upper ureteral stones and impacted calculus: implications for clinical practice

Provisionally accepted
Longhui  LaiLonghui Lai1,2Yuanfeng  ZhangYuanfeng Zhang1,3Yingru  WangYingru Wang1Enguang  YangEnguang Yang1Guangrui  FanGuangrui Fan1Chaohu  ChenChaohu Chen1Kang  YaoKang Yao1Wenzhao  ZhangWenzhao Zhang2,4Yongfei  LiuYongfei Liu2,5Kai  ZhuKai Zhu2Meixuan  DingMeixuan Ding2,6Jinchun  XingJinchun Xing2Zhiping  WangZhiping Wang1Peide  BaiPeide Bai2Tao  WangTao Wang2Bin  ChenBin Chen2Jun  MiJun Mi1*
  • 1Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
  • 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
  • 3Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, China
  • 4The Affiliated Women and Children's Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
  • 5Longyan First Hospital, Longyan, China
  • 6Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: The novel semirigid ureteroscopy with a vacuum suction device has been increasing in the treatment of urinary stones recently. This study aimed to evaluate its clinical efficacy for treating >10 mm upper ureteral stones and impacted calculus and to further assess the efficacy by using a vacuum suction device during lithotripsy procedures. Patients and methods: This study included 156 patients with >10 mm upper ureteral calculi who underwent laser lithotripsy under the novel semirigid ureteroscopy with a vacuum suction device. The vacuum suction device and the end of the ureteral access sheath (UAS) were joined together to create a closed circulation working channel between the former and the collection system. This circulation working channel allows the operator to suction stone fragments out of the body during lithotripsy. Based on impacted and non-impacted upper ureteral stones, subgroup analysis was performed. Results: Of the 156 patients, 150 underwent successful phase I ureteral sheath placement and lithotripsy. 6 patients were unsuccessfully placed for UAS because of upper ureteral stenosis, but all of them received indwelling Double-J tubes for one month and then underwent successful second-stage lithotripsy. The average operative time was 43.8 ± 25.7min. The stone-free rate (SFR) was 57.7% (90/156) at 1 day postoperatively, and 87.8% (137/156) at 1 month postoperatively. The rate of complications was 9.0% (14/156). In subgroup analysis, for the impacted stone group, the average operative time was 48.0 ± 29.3min. The SFR was 54.8% (46/84) at 1 day postoperatively, and 88.1% (74/84) at 1 month postoperatively. The rate of complications was 10.7% (9/84). Conclusion: For the treatment of >10 mm upper ureteral stones and impacted calculus, the novel semirigid ureteroscopy with a vacuum suction device is safe and effective. During the lithotripsy procedure, the use of a vacuum suction device has the potential to improve stone removal efficiency. However, due to the critical limitation of the lack of integrated pressure monitoring and control devices, potential complications caused by negative pressure suction and perfusion flow imbalance should be watched out for.

Keywords: Upper ureteral stone, impacted calculi, Semirigid ureteroscopy, Vacuum suction device, lithotripsy procedures

Received: 30 Jun 2025; Accepted: 26 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lai, Zhang, Wang, Yang, Fan, Chen, Yao, Zhang, Liu, Zhu, Ding, Xing, Wang, Bai, Wang, Chen and Mi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jun Mi

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.