Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg.

Sec. Orthopedic Surgery

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1661609

This article is part of the Research TopicPain Management in Spine SurgeryView all 15 articles

Efficacy and safety of epsilon-aminohexanoic acid and tranexamic acid 1 in posterior interbody fusion surgery

Provisionally accepted
Dilixiati  AiniwaerDilixiati Ainiwaer1*Ayinuer  TuersunAyinuer Tuersun2Jiang  LiJiang Li1*Xiaomei  LiXiaomei Li2
  • 1Sixth People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
  • 2The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Methods Retrospective analysis of 180 patients with lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis, and lumbar spondylolisthesis admitted to the Spinal Surgery Department of the Sixth People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from September 2021 to May 2023, who underwent PLIF.According to the types of hemostatic drugs used during the perioperative period,they were divided into two groups,namely EACA group (n=86) and TXA group (n=94).The main outcome measures are total blood loss,total red blood cell loss,and transfusion volume/rate;Other outcome measures:length of hospital stay,hospitalization costs, deep vein thrombosis rate, and biochemical hematological indicators,including anemia,nutrition, and coagulation related indicators.Results ①The red blood cell width of the EACA group was (43.94±10.56), while that of the TXA group was (40.45 ± 12.54). The red blood cell width of the EACA group was significantly higher than that of the TXA group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05).② The postoperative total protein of the EACA group was (56.17±7.83), while that of the TXA group was (59.3628±6.73).The postoperative total protein of the TXA group was significantly higher than that of the EACA group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05).③The postoperative INR of the EACA group was (1.06±0.14), while the postoperative total protein of the TXA group was (1.14±0.13). The postoperative INR of the TXA group was significantly higher than that of the EACA group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in other indicators.Conclusion There is no significant difference in total blood loss,total red blood cell loss,transfusion volume/rate,postoperative hospitalization time,hospitalization costs,and surgical complications between intravenous EACA and TXA in PLIF.The two have similar hemostatic effects and safety.Therefore,when selecting anti fibrinolytic drugs during PLIF surgery,EACA canbe considered as a substitute drug for TXA.However,large-scale,multicenter randomized controlled studies are still needed in the later stage.

Keywords: Lumbar disc herniation, Lumbar spondylolisthesis, Lumbar spinal stenosis, Posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Tranexamic Acid, Epsilon-aminohexanic acid, Blood loss

Received: 08 Jul 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ainiwaer, Tuersun, Li and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Dilixiati Ainiwaer, peifu95596478@163.com
Jiang Li, gongkesha3111@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.