ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Neurosurgery
This article is part of the Research TopicEndoscopy, Navigation, Robotics, Current Trends and Newer Technologies in the Management of Spinal Disorders. Towards a Paradigm Change in the Clinical Practice.View all 8 articles
Non-pressurized Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy in the Treatment of Cauda Equina Syndrome Caused by Lumbar Disc Herniation
Provisionally accepted
- Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but devastating condition in spine surgery. There are various surgical decompression methods, but the clinical outcomes are not always satisfactory. We introduce the surgical technique of non-pressurized percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETD) technique in the treatment of cauda equina syndrome caused by lumbar disc herniation, and to evaluate its clinical efficacy compared to traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 51 cases diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation complicated by cauda equina syndrome. They were divided into two groups, 23 cases in the PETD group and 28 cases in the TLIF group. The surgical procedure and technical details of non-pressurized PETD technique were described. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back pain and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (JOA), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the cauda scale (TCS) were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups. Significant improvements were observed at the final follow-up in both PETD and TLIF groups. The VAS for low back pain and ODI at discharge were lower in the PETD group than those in the TLIF group (both P<0.05). There were no significant differences in low back pain VAS, leg pain VAS, JOA score, ODI score, and TCS score between the two groups at preoperative and final follow-up. The complications included two cases of intraoperative neck pain and one case of recurrent disc herniation in the PETD group, and one case showed adjacent segment degeneration at the final follow-up in the TLIF group. Conclusion: In this preliminary retrospective study, the non-pressurized PETD technique was associated with similar medium-term outcomes and a faster short-term recovery compared to TLIF. These findings require validation in larger, prospective, randomized controlled trials to establish comparative efficacy.
Keywords: Transforaminal endoscopic surgery, Surgical technique, Lumbar disc herniation, Technical modification, cauda equina syndrome
Received: 28 Jul 2025; Accepted: 21 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gao, Shi, Cao, Wei, Lv and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Wenyi Li, 1456545703@qq.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.