ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Surg.
Sec. Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1682145
This article is part of the Research TopicRecent Advancements and New Developments in Reconstructive SurgeryView all 11 articles
A Comparative Study on the Clinical Outcomes of Local Flap Transfer and Free Flap Transplantation for the Repair of Lower Limb Bone Exposure Wounds
Provisionally accepted
- 1Huai 'an Hospital affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Huaian, China
- 2The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- 3Shangqiu First People's Hospital, Shangqiu, China
- 4The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical outcomes of local flap transfer and free flap transplantation for the repair of lower limb bone exposure wounds. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 90 patients with lower limb bone exposure wounds admitted to our hospital from December 2022 to January 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of flap repair: the local flap group (n=50) and the free flap group (n=40). The local flap group underwent local flap transfer repair, while the free flap group underwent free flap transplantation repair. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, complication incidence, and 1-year postoperative aesthetic satisfaction, functional recovery rate, and quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire). Results: Compared with the local flap group, the free flap group had longer surgical duration, greater intraoperative blood loss, and shorter hospital stay, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the local flap group (10.00%) was significantly lower than that in the free flap group (30.00%) (P<0.05). One year postoperatively, the aesthetic satisfaction rate in the free flap group (92.50%) was slightly higher than that in the local flap group (82.00%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.145). The rate of excellent functional recovery in the free flap group (87.50%) was significantly higher than that in the local flap group (70.00%, P=0.047), and the scores for eight dimensions of the SF-36 questionnaire, including physical pain and physical function, were significantly higher (all P<0.01). Conclusion: Local flap transfer has the advantages of less surgical trauma and fewer complications; although free flap transplantation is more complex in operation and has a higher risk of complications, it has more advantages in functional recovery and improvement of quality of life.
Keywords: local flap transfer, Free flap transplantation, lower limb bone exposure wounds, complications, Quality of Life
Received: 08 Aug 2025; Accepted: 16 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Zhao, Guo and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xueyang Li, qwertyuio0922@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.