Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg.

Sec. Colorectal and Proctological Surgery

This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing outcomes in colorectal cancer: Multidisciplinary approaches to therapy and pain managementView all 14 articles

Effect of Psyllium husk on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome after Rectal Cancer Surgery – a Pilot Prospective Cohort Study

Provisionally accepted
Silje  Stensholt HolteSilje Stensholt Holte1,2*Airazat  M. KazaryanAirazat M. Kazaryan3,4Geir  Svein HoffGeir Svein Hoff1,5Natalia  AvalianiNatalia Avaliani1Giedrius  LauzikasGiedrius Lauzikas1Johannes  Kurt SchultzJohannes Kurt Schultz2,6
  • 1Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
  • 2Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 3Sykehuset Ostfold HF, Grålum, Norway
  • 4Yerevan State Medical University Named after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
  • 5Kreftregisteret, Oslo, Norway
  • 6Akershus Universitetssykehus HF, Lørenskog, Norway

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a frequent, undesired consequence of rectal cancer surgery (1). Psyllium husk has been suggested as a nutritional supplement in the management of LARS, but without trial-based evidence of its effect. In preparation of a randomized clinical trial, this pilot study aimed to estimate the effect of Psyllium husk in patients with LARS, determining the treatment duration required to observe the effect and assess patient compliance. Methods This single arm phase II study included patients with LARS score >20 ten months or more after rectal resection. Patients who consented to participate were given 3.66 g Psyllium husk fiber twice daily for 56 days. The primary endpoint was severity of bowel dysfunction using the LARS score. The secondary endpoint was quality of life (QoL) using EQ-VAS score in the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. A reduction of 7 points in LARS score was considered clinically relevant. Questionnaires and scores were collected on paper day 0 (baseline), day 28 and day 56. Results 22 patients were assigned to the intervention and included in the analysis. The average age was 65.3 (SD 10.4), the average LARS score at baseline was 35,7 (SD 3.5), four patients had received radiotherapy. The proportion of patients with a LARS score reduction of 7 points or more compared to baseline was 50.0% at day 28 (11/22) and 50.0% at day 56 (10/20). The mean reduction in LARS scores from baseline to 8 weeks of treatment was 7.7 points. At day 28, the proportion of patients with a QoL score (EQ-VAS score) increase of 10 points or more was 36.4% (8/22), increasing to 60.0% (12/20) by day 56. Two patients dropped out after 4 weeks of treatment, one due to taste and consistency of the supplement and one due to inconsistently beneficial effect. Conclusions Psyllium husk appears to clinically significantly improve both bowel dysfunction and QoL in rectal cancer patients suffering from LARS. This study highlights the need for further systematic research, and provides a strong basis for a well-designed RCT.

Keywords: Bowel dysfunction, LARS, Low anterior resection, Rectal resection, rectal cancer, Quality of Life, Psyllium husk

Received: 15 Aug 2025; Accepted: 24 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Holte, Kazaryan, Hoff, Avaliani, Lauzikas and Schultz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Silje Stensholt Holte, hsil@sthf.no

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.