ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Virtual Real.
Sec. Virtual Reality in Medicine
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frvir.2025.1587316
This article is part of the Research TopicA Metaverse for the Good: Design, Application and UnderstandingView all 24 articles
Delphi Study on the Metaverse as an Appropriate Setting for Mental Health Care: conceptualization, opportunities, challenges, and conditions
Provisionally accepted- 1Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Metaverse-based mental health services may be poised to increase access and augment treatment; doing so ethically requires anticipating risks and actively shaping how this emerging setting might support care. With limited means to directly evaluate the Metaverse's potential role in the provision of appropriate mental health care, there is value in conceptual expert input. Methods: The aim of the present Delphi study was to gather global academic experts to explore where opinions converged and diverged regarding three foundational topics: 1) A working definition of the Metaverse; 2) A conception of appropriate care in the Metaverse that identifies key potential challenges; and 3) Conditions that may help align mental health offerings in the Metaverse with tenets of appropriate care. The study was carried out in an e-Delphi format – asynchronously online – in three rounds with statements divided according to the study aims. Panelists rated agreement with statements, suggested modifications, provided commentary on their position, suggested additional statements, and reviewed panelist-generated statements. Results: The 14 panelists, identified through literature review, represented top universities and pioneering research labs in the field. Of the 27 original statements, all reached consensus by Round Three. 27 new statements were generated based on panel suggestion, of which 20 reached consensus. Panelists produced a working definition of the Metaverse, exhibited clarity regarding the possible suitability of the Metaverse as a setting for appropriate mental health care, identified challenges to providing such care, and identified interventions that may meaningfully address Metaverse-specific care concerns. Conclusion: Additional research building on the identified issues and solutions is needed to responsibly shape the form and content of both future mental health offerings and the Metaverse itself. Next steps should involve service users to voice their perspective; clinicians to shape best clinical practice; industry to consider standards; and policymakers to build upon the suggested regulatory measures.
Keywords: Metaverse, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Appropriate care, Ethics, Delphi study
Received: 04 Mar 2025; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gloeckler, Ford and Biller-Andorno. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Sophie Gloeckler, sophie.ggloeckler@gmail.com
Nikola Biller-Andorno, biller-andorno@ibme.uzh.ch
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.