Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Virtual Real.

Sec. Virtual Reality and Human Behaviour

This article is part of the Research TopicMultimodal human action recognition in real or virtual environmentsView all 4 articles

Immersive technologies for evaluating industrial safety training in high-risk environments: a review on opportunities and challenges

Provisionally accepted
Andre  CordeiroAndre Cordeiro1*Yasmin  FerreiraYasmin Ferreira2Regina  LeiteRegina Leite3Lucas  GregoryLucas Gregory4Alexandre  Gomes De SiqueiraAlexandre Gomes De Siqueira5Tiago  SilvaTiago Silva6Marcio  CatapanMarcio Catapan4Ingrid  WinklerIngrid Winkler2*
  • 1Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 2Centro Universitario SENAI CIMATEC, Salvador, Brazil
  • 3Instituto Federal de Educacao Ciencia e Tecnologia da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
  • 4Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
  • 5University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
  • 6Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Evaluating industrial safety training in high-risk environments remains a methodological challenge, especially in sectors such as construction and mining, where the reliable measurement of knowledge transfer and behavioral change is limited. This study aims to identify the key attributes required for a model that leverages immersive technologies to evaluate safety training in high-risk scenarios, thereby advancing occupational safety research and informing the design of industrial training programs. A PRISMA-guided systematic review of 37 peer-reviewed studies (2021-2025) was conducted across Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science, ensuring transparency and reproducibility. The analysis identified methodological patterns, technological features and research gaps. Most studies addressed immediate outcomes (reaction and learning, corresponding to Levels 1 and 2 of Kirkpatrick's model), while evidence on behavioral change (Level 3) and organizational impact (Level 4) is scarce. Evaluation strategies are also fragmented, with a predominance of self-report questionnaires and limited use of biometric or performance-based metrics. Emerging approaches combine multimodal Human Action Recognition (HAR), biometric sensing (eye-tracking, EEG, heart rate), and behavioral analytics to enable real-time, performance-based assessment. Adaptive, AI-driven and gamified environments are also gaining relevance, by combining biometric feedback with behavioral data to detect and interpret user actions in real time. By consolidating these attributes, this review delineates the essential components of an immersive evaluation framework that advances methodological rigor and supports safer, human-centered industrial training aligned with Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0.

Keywords: immersive technologies, Safety training, High-risk industries, evaluation frameworks, virtual reality, Systematic Literature Review

Received: 16 Oct 2025; Accepted: 21 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Cordeiro, Ferreira, Leite, Gregory, Gomes De Siqueira, Silva, Catapan and Winkler. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Andre Cordeiro, amcordeiro@yahoo.com.br
Ingrid Winkler, ingrid.winkler@doc.senaicimatec.edu.br

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.