Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 12 May 2020
Sec. Food Microbiology

Diversity of Lactobacillus Species of Stilton Cheese Relates to Site of Isolation

  • 1School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Food Technology, Kyambogo University, Kampala, Uganda
  • 3Department of Food Science and Nutrition, School of the Environment, University of the Aegean, Lemnos, Greece
  • 4Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom

This study has characterized the dominant non-starter Lactobacillus species isolated from different sites in a Stilton cheese to establish its diversity, stress-tolerance, anti-microbial activity and potential contribution to quality of cheese. Fifty-nine Lactobacillus isolates were cultured from the outer crust, blue veins and white core of the cheese and were speciated phenotypically and by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Lactobacillus plantarum was the dominant species detected with only two isolates identified as Lactobacillus brevis. Strains were typed by pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using the enzyme NotI to examine their genomic diversity. Cluster analysis of PFGE patterns produced five major clusters which associated isolates with their sites of isolation within the cheese. One L. plantarum isolate from each cheese site was selected and evaluated for salt, acid, relative humidity, and heat tolerance to determine whether stress conditions within the isolation site selected their phenotype. D72°C values were 6, 13, and 17 s for strains from the crust, veins and core, respectively, suggesting strains on the crust may not have been able to survive pasteurization and therefore had been added post-pasteurization. All strains recovered from heat injury within 24–48 h at 4°C. pH values of 3, 3.5, and 4 suppressed growth but strains showed a varying ability to grow at pH 4.5 and 5; isolates from the core (which has the lowest pH) were the most acid-tolerant. All strains grew at 3.5 and 5% salt but were suppressed at 10%; those from the crust (which has a lower water activity) were the most halo-tolerant, growing at 8% salt whereas strains from the core were sensitive to this salt concentration. All 57 L. plantarum isolates were examined for antimicrobial activity and variable activity against Lactobacillus pentosus and other genera was demonstrated; plantaricin EF genes were present in 65% of strains. It was concluded that there are varied phenotypes and genotypes of Lactobacillus in a Stilton cheese according to site of isolation. Occurrence of different L. plantarum genotypes could contribute to variation in the cheese quality from batch to batch and provides criteria for selecting isolates as potential adjunct cultures.

Introduction

Stilton is a protected designation of origin (PDO) mold-ripened semisoft blue-veined cheese made from pasteurized cows’ milk in the United Kingdom. Acidification is achieved by the addition of Lactococcus lactis as a starter culture, while ripening is promoted by development of the mold Penicillium roqueforti as well as non-starter bacteria (Ercolini et al., 2003) and yeasts (Gkatzionis et al., 2014). Microbial communities in Stilton differentiate according to their spatial distribution in the outer crust, blue veins, and white core of the cheese (Ercolini et al., 2003; Gkatzionis et al., 2014). For example, Kluyveromyces lactis and Debaryomyces hansenii were found to be the dominant yeasts in the blue veins whereas Candida catenulata and Yarrowia lipolytica were mostly found in the outer crust and white core (Gkatzionis et al., 2014). This diversity in the microbial composition according to spatial distribution was associated with differences in aroma development in each section of the cheese (Gkatzionis et al., 2009, 2013; Price et al., 2013). The bacterial community structure in these cheese sites was also found to be different in each section, comprising L. lactis, Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus curvatus, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Staphylococcus equorum, and Staphylococcus sp., with L. plantarum being the dominant species (Hiscox et al., 1940; Sharpe and Brindley, 1956; Whitley, 2002; Ercolini et al., 2003). This complex microbiota is responsible for ripening leading to the typical aroma development of the cheese, although the composition is fortuitous, through accidental introduction during production, and not directly controlled by the producer. It is, thus, evident that the structure and composition of the microbiota of Stilton cheese may reflect natural selection at the different cheese sites due to varying gradients of redox potential, acid, osmotic and other stresses which constitute a selection criterion for these organisms through competition and symbiotic interactions (Turroni et al., 2009). It may also reflect the source of introduction of each isolate.

Whereas the spatial differentiation of Stilton microbial communities has been established at the species level, there is a lack of information on biotypes at subspecies and strain levels. Moreover, individual strains often pose profound effects on cheese flavor and texture characteristics (Broadbent et al., 2003), defects and production inconsistencies. In the present study, the subspecies diversity of the lactobacilli occurring in a Stilton cheese was determined on the basis of their pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns, morphological and biochemical characteristics, antimicrobial activity, presence and expression of plantaricin genes, as well as response to different stresses typical of the cheese microenvironment.

Materials and Methods

Microbial Isolation and Identification

An 8 kg commercial sample of Stilton cheese at the end of ripening (45 days) was purchased from a local retailer in Nottingham city and precisely partitioned into different sections, the outer crust, blue veins and white core. Microbiological analysis was performed on each of the cheese sections as described by Gkatzionis et al. (2014) by aseptically scrapping 130–190 mg micro-samples into sterile o-ringed micro-centrifuge vials (BioSpec Products, Sanford, United Kingdom). The samples were mixed with nine parts of maximum recovery diluent (MRD; Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) and four glass beads (2 mm, acid washed, BioSpec Products, Sanford, United Kingdom), and homogenized using a Mini Beadbeater-1 (BioSpec Products) at 2,500 rpm for 2 s × 40 s, cooling on ice between each treatment. Samples of the same cheese section were pooled and 1 ml volumes used for further 10-fold serial dilutions and subsequently plated on M17 agar (Oxoid) and standard Rogosa agar (pH 5.4 ± 0.2 at 25°C, Oxoid). Plates were incubated aerobically/anaerobically in sealed plastic containers enclosed with 2.5 L Anaerogen (AN0035, Oxoid) gas generating sachets for 24–48 h at 30–37°C. After incubation, three to five colonies with different morphologies (large cream-whitish, profuse and small, and elliptical off-white) were randomly selected and streaked twice on Rogosa and M17 agar for purification. The isolates were stored in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Oxoid) with the addition of 20% (v/v) glycerol (G/0650/17, Fisher Scientific) at −80°C in a freezer (U570, New Brunswick Scientific, England) until use. Lactic acid bacterial (LAB) isolates were recovered by culturing on Rogosa and M17 agar after incubation for 48 h at 30°C anaerobically and tested for Gram reaction, catalase, oxidase, and motility (Collins et al., 2004). Cell morphology was examined under oil immersion microscopy (Collins et al., 2004).

Identification at species level was achieved by 16S rDNA sequence analysis using Lactobacillus-specific V6–V8 primers Lac1 (5′-AGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCA-3′) and Lac2 (5′-ATTTCACCGCTACACATG-3′) adopted from Lopez et al. (2003). Genomic DNA was extracted as described by Pitcher et al. (1989). PCR conditions were adopted from Lopez et al. (2003). Speciation of L. plantarum was validated using rec A gene multiplex PCR analysis as described by Torriani et al. (2001).

Physiological Characterization

Metabolism of various carbon sources for the 59 Lactobacillus isolates was determined using API 50 CHL (BioMerieux, France). Profiles of the biochemical reactions were recorded visually, and identifications obtained using the API software (BioMerieux).

Subspecies Typing by PFGE

For each isolate, a colony was inoculated in 10 ml MRS broth (Oxoid) and incubated for 16 h at 30°C. The culture (1.5–3 ml) was centrifuged for 1 min at 13,000 g to harvest the cells. Genomic DNA was prepared in situ in agarose blocks as described by Moore and Datta (1994) and Yeung et al. (2004). Genomic DNA was digested with 40 U of NotI (Promega, Southampton, United Kingdom), which recognizes G + C rich sequences, and produced suitable PFGE patterns for the tested isolates (Yeung et al., 2004). This is due to relatively low guanine and cytosine content (35–47 G + C mol %) in the genome of lactobacilli. Gel electrophoresis was performed using the method of Vancanneyt et al. (2006) with minor modifications. Plug slices were loaded into wells of 1% (w/v) PFGE certified agarose (Bio-Rad, Philadelphia, PA, United States) gel prepared in 0.5X TBE buffer containing 100 μM thiourea (Sigma). Electrophoresis was performed in 2 L of 0.5X TBE buffer containing 100 μM thiourea in a contour-clamped homogenous electrophoresis cell (CHEF) DRII (Bio-Rad) at 14°C for 21 h at 6 V/cm and pulse times ramping linearly from 4 to 45 s at a switching angle of 120° and pump pressure of 80 rpm. A 50–1,000 kbp DNA ladder (Sigma) was used as a molecular size marker. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained in 100 ml of sterile deionized water (SDW) containing 10 μl (10 mg/ml) of ethidium bromide (Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at room temperature, and subsequently de-stained in 100 ml of SDW for 30 min at room temperature. Images were visualized on a UV trans-illuminator (Bio-Rad) and recorded with Quantity one Gel Doc software (Bio-Rad).

Cluster Analysis

The PFGE patterns were normalized and processed using FP Quest software (Bio-Rad) to generate the dendrogram. Clustering was calculated using the un-weighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) and comparison of the patterns done using the band-based Dice similarity coefficient. Clusters were defined at a similarity level of 52% (Tenover et al., 1995). The significance of clustering was tested using analysis of molecular variance (Excoffier et al., 1992) by calculating the PhiPT value (ΦPT), a measure of sub-population or cluster genetic differentiation that suppresses intra-individual variation. Calculation of ΦPT was performed using GenAlEx v.6.5 software.

Acid and Salt Tolerance

Acid and salt tolerance of selected L. plantarum isolates was evaluated using the approach of Succi et al. (2005) and Pelinescu et al. (2009). Isolates were grown in 10 ml MRS broth (Oxoid) overnight at 30°C. The culture was transferred into 30 ml of MRS broth acidified to pH 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, and 5 using lactic acid (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) to attain an inoculum level of 105 CFU ml–1. The broths were incubated at 30°C and 100 rev min–1 in a shaking incubator (Gallenkamp, Loughborough, United Kingdom). Aliquots (0.1 ml) were withdrawn at different time intervals; these were used for enumeration of the injured and un-injured viable counts on the non-selective BHI agar (Oxoid) at 30°C, anaerobically. Salt tolerance was examined under the same conditions by inoculating the isolates into MRS broth containing 3.5, 5, 8, and 10% sodium chloride (Fisher Scientific, United Kingdom).

Desiccation Tolerance

Desiccation tolerance was determined according to the method of Pedersen et al. (2008). Cells from 1 ml MRS broth (Oxoid) culture were harvested by spinning at 9,000 g for 2 min, 4°C and suspended in 1 ml of maximum recovery diluent (MRD, Oxoid). Aliquots (50 μl) were added to two sets of U-shaped wells in 96 mm × 128 mm micro-titer plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). Un-inoculated wells were filled with 50 μl sterile MRD (blank). The plates were dried for 24 h at 30°C and subsequently transferred into separate desiccators with RH established and maintained at 33 ± 1 and 54 ± 1% using saturated solutions of magnesium chloride hexahydrate (Acros Organics, NJ, United States) and magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, United States), respectively. The desiccators were incubated at 20 ± 1°C for 7 days. Desiccated cells were rehydrated for 30 min by adding 0.1 ml MRD, and then mixed by pipetting. Then, 0.1 ml of each sample was mixed with 0.9 ml MRD to obtain the initial dilution of 10–1. Further 10-fold dilutions up to 10–9 were prepared in MRD. Each sample was plated in triplicate on BHI agar and incubated anaerobically at 30°C for 48 h. Plates with 30–300 colonies were enumerated to obtain counts at different time points. In order to ascertain the behavior of the isolates in the absence of nutrients, the experiment was repeated by suspending the cells in sterile deionized water (Fermentas, Altrincham, United Kingdom) prior to drying and desiccation.

Heat Tolerance and Recovery of Injured Cells

Heat tolerance was ascertained in sterile cows’ milk (3% fat; Drinks Brokers Ltd., Norfolk, England). L. plantarum isolates were cultivated in MRS broth (Oxoid) at 30°C for 24 h. Cells were harvested from 1 ml culture by centrifugation at 13,000 g, 1 min and washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Oxoid). The cell pellet was re-suspended in 1 ml PBS and spiked into milk at a final concentration of 9 log10 CFU ml–1. Inoculated milk was dispensed in 0.5 ml aliquots into 1.5 ml Wheaton vials (Fisher Scientific, Suwanee, GA, United States). The vials were fully immersed in a water bath (Grant Instruments, Royston, United Kingdom) pre-heated to 72 ± 1°C, and 0.1 ml samples withdrawn at different time points into pre-cooled (4°C) MRD (Oxoid). Each cooled sample was serially diluted in MRD and the dilutions (0.1 ml) were plated in duplicate onto BHI (Oxoid) and MRS agar (Oxoid) for enumeration of the viable counts. The counts were normalized to log10 CFU ml–1, converted into percent survivors and plotted against time (s). Viable counts below the 1 log10 CFU ml–1 limit of detection were regarded as negative recovery. A D72°C value for each isolate was calculated from the linear portion of the curve (0–50 s) with a correlation coefficient, r2, >0.90 (Ahmed et al., 1995). Recovery from heat stress was assessed by enumeration of viable counts on MRS and BHI agar after keeping the heat-treated milk samples for 48 h at 4°C. Milk inoculated with different levels of each of the isolates and kept for 48 h at 4°C was used as a growth control for the heat recovery experiments (Swift, 2010; Mugampoza, 2013).

Antimicrobial Activity of the Isolates and Screening for Bacteriocin Genes

Screening for bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus isolates was carried out on MRS agar (Oxoid) using the plate agar overlay method of Powell et al. (2007). All plates were incubated at 30°C for 24 h. The plates with 30–100 colonies were overlaid with a layer of 0.7% (w/v) BHI agar (Oxoid) seeded with 106 CFU ml–1 of the indicator strain. The seeded plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Lactobacillus colonies with the largest zones of growth inhibition measured using a hand ruler were isolated, purified and used for confirmation of antimicrobial activity.

Antimicrobial activity was confirmed by using the paper diffusion assay (Albano et al., 2007) using Pseudomonas aeruginosa glaxo 3, Escherichia coli 0157: H7-stx, Listeria monocytogenes NCTC 11944, and Lactobacillus pentosus NCIMB 8026 which were the most sensitive strains from the agar overlay assays. Lactobacillus isolates were grown in 10 ml MRS broth (Oxoid) for 24 h at 30°C and 100 rev min–1. The culture was centrifuged at 3,400 g (Megafuge 40R, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 15 min at 4°C to obtain a cell-free supernatant (CFS). CFS was sterilized with a 0.2 μm membrane filter (Minisart Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) and stored at 4°C until use. Indicator strains were grown at 30–37°C in 10 ml BHI broth depending on the optimum temperature of each strain. Petri dishes filled with 20 ml of 1.5% (w/v) MRS agar were overlaid with 10 ml of BHI or MRS with 0.7% (w/v) agar, as appropriate, inoculated with 106 CFU ml–1 indicator strain. Sterile filter paper discs (Whatman AA, 13 mm, Fisher Scientific) were soaked in the CFS for 30–60 min and then applied to the seeded plates in duplicate. All plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C and the diameter (mm) of the resulting zone of inhibition measured from the edge of the paper disc to the edge of the zone of clearing. Halos extending for 0.5 mm or more were considered as positive. The nature of antimicrobial activity was examined using CFS treated with 1N NaOH to bring the pH to 6.5–7 to neutralize acids and/or with 500 U ml–1 catalase (Sigma) to eliminate hydrogen peroxide. Treatment with 1 mg ml–1 proteinase K (Fermentas) was used to ascertain whether activity was due to bacteriocin (putative plantaricin) production. Enzyme treated supernatants were incubated for 30 min 37°C and the enzymes inactivated by boiling for 2 min. Presence of the various plantaricin genes was examined using PCR as described by Mugampoza 2013, (Section 3.3.4.3); the primers and PCR conditions were adopted from Cho et al. (2010) and Yi et al. (2010). A pediocin-producing strain of Pediococcus acidilactici NCIMB 700993 was used as a control.

Statistical Analysis of Count Data

Challenge experiments were performed in triplicate and counts were normalized by conversion to log10 CFU ml–1. Single factor ANOVA computed with the Predictive Analytical Software, v.17 was used to determine the statistical significance of the data. Results with p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Viable counts below the 1 log10 CFU ml–1 limit of detection were regarded as negative.

Results

Microbial Isolation and Identification

Based on colony characteristics, cell morphologies and biochemical tests, 61 Lactobacillus isolates (Supplementary Table S1) were recovered from different sections of the Stilton cheese on Rogosa agar. All were Gram-positive, catalase and oxidase negative, non-sporing rods (Supplementary Table S2) and these were further investigated in this study. 16S rDNA sequence analysis showed 55 of the 57 Lactobacillus isolates were close relatives of L. plantarum (Supplementary Table S3), and two isolates were identified as close relatives of L. brevis (Supplementary Table S3). Identification of L. plantarum isolates was discriminated from L. pentosus and Lactobacillus paraplantarum using PCR amplification of RecA gene (Supplementary Figure S3). L. pentosus formed 1 band of 218 bp, a typed L. plantarum NCIMB 318914 formed the band of 318 bp like the Stilton isolates implying similarity. In L. paraplantarum the product size is 107 bp which none of our isolates formed. In fact, bands belonging to reference Lb. pentosus and those belonging to a single Lb. plantarum isolate obtained from Stilton cheese were excised, sequenced and appropriately identified as recA gene sequences belonging to L. pentosus and L. plantarum. The presence of two bands in the multiplex PCR reaction for Lb. plantarum isolates obtained from Stilton cheese may be attributed to the fact that these isolates belong to a subspecies of Lb. plantarum. There is a need for further studies to assign all Lactobacillus isolates to their subspecies.

PFGE Profiling

Cluster analysis of the 59 identified isolates was conducted to establish the degree of genomic relatedness of the Lactobacillus isolates. The dendrogram yielded five major geno-groups at a similarity level of 52% (ΦPT = 0.34; P < 0.01; Figure 1). All clusters (except II and IV) had related PFGE profiles and only contained isolates from the blue veins and white core implying clonal relationship. Cluster I was the largest and comprised 37 isolates, whereas clusters II and IV were the smallest and contained two isolates each. L. plantarum strains R24 and R20 were outliers to clusters II and V, respectively, while R37 was an outliner to the five clusters. In Group 1, strains B27 and B28 from the blue veins and W9 from the white core showed 100% similarity, as did W12 and W13 from the white core, and so were considered to be identical. All isolates from the outer crust grouped in clusters III and IV with only one blue vein isolate, R16, suggesting they entered into the cheese from a common source. Piercing, which occurs during the ripening process, could have introduced a crust isolate into the veins and could explain the similarity of R16 with this group. This has been suggested to occur in other blue-veined cheeses (Yunita and Dodd, 2018).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Dendrogram showing the clustering of Lactobacillus isolates from different sections in Stilton cheese based on PFGE patterns produced using Not1. Similarity values were obtained using the Dice coefficient and clustering by UPGMA. Groups I–V are defined at 52% (vertical line). Strains from: (■) outer crust, (■) blue veins, and (■) white core. All isolates were Lb. plantarum except for Lb. brevis (strains R9 and R15, cluster III).

Cluster analysis did not delineate L. brevis isolates (R9 and R15, Figure 1) as a separate and distinct cluster even though these belong to a different species. The latter were adjacently aligned and grouped with L. plantarum in cluster III. This suggests some homology in genomic DNA of these LAB species, although both had been shown to exhibit different API profiles (discussed later).

Phenotypic Characterization of Lactobacillus Isolates

A total of 16 representative Lactobacillus isolates (indicated in Figure 1) were characterized on the basis of carbohydrate fermentation patterns (API) and assigned as L. plantarum and L. brevis in agreement with the 16S rDNA identification. The percent identification for L. plantarum isolates ranged from 90.4 to 99.9%, and 95 to 96.1% for L. brevis isolates (Supplementary Table S4). L. plantarum isolates such as strains R4 and R5, which clustered close to each other, also had similar API profiles, demonstrating good correspondence of the two typing methods. All Lactobacillus isolates utilized ribose, glucose and fructose. The fermentation pattern of the other carbohydrates was species-dependent. Both L. brevis isolates could only metabolize ribose, xylose, fructose, glucose, and gluconate out of the 50 substrates; L. brevis strain R9 could assimilate galactose and α-keto gluconate (profile 6) whereas R15 could assimilate potassium gluconate (profile 7).

Nine of the 14 L. plantarum isolates had similar substrate assimilation profiles (profile 4) but four showed a different pattern confirming a mixed population of these organisms. The diversity was caused by differences in the ability to assimilate rhamnose, mannoside, and melezitose. In contrast to all the other L. plantarum isolates, strains R4 and R5 (outer crust) and R37 (white core) could assimilate melezitose but not rhamnose; R4 atypically could not assimilate mannoside. The API T-indices were lower than 1.0 suggesting that the profiles were not absolutely typical of the species identified. This also indicates that the API database does not contain a large number of wild isolates demonstrating the diversity of Lactobacillus isolates selected in the Stilton sample examined.

Acid Tolerance

Preliminary experiments on acid stress tolerance of six isolates, two from each cheese section, selected from the three major PFGE clusters (I, III, and V, Figure 1) showed no significant variation in stress response (p > 0.05; Mugampoza, 2013). Therefore, three isolates, R2 from the outer crust, B14 from blue veins and W30 from the white core, were selected for further stress tolerance studies using the approach of Catte et al. (1999), and testing for tolerance to heat, acid, salt and desiccation stresses.

Figure 2 shows the acid tolerance of the three L. plantarum isolates in MRS broth acidified to pH 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, and 6 (control). The viable counts for all isolates were undetectable after 2 h of exposure at pH 3 (data not shown; Mugampoza, 2013). The isolates presented different sensitivities at pH 3.5 leading to gradual cell death. At 48 h, strain R2 from the outer crust (Figure 2A) was the most sensitive (4.4 log10 CFU ml–1 reduction), whereas B14 from the blue veins (Figure 2B; 2.9 log10 CFU ml–1 reduction) and W30 from the white core (Figure 2C; 2.3 log10 CFU ml–1 reduction) were more acid tolerant. Exposure at pH 4 was inhibitory for growth of all the tested isolates, but pH 4.5 and 5 had no significant effect on growth characteristics of the isolates relative to the control (p > 0.05). The pH of fresh Stilton curd 2 h after coagulation is approximately 6.7, decreases to approximately 4.8 in a 4 day-old cheese with lower values in the white core, but increases thereafter to approximately 6 at the end of ripening (Madkor et al., 1987).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Acid tolerance of L. plantarum isolates from Stilton cheese: (A) R2, outer crust; (B) B14, blue veins; (C) W30, white core. Assays were performed in MRS broth at pH: (◆) 6, control, (■) 5, (▲) 4.5, (X) 4, and (🌑) 3.5.

Salt Tolerance

Different sodium chloride concentrations (3.5, 5, 8, and 10%) in the medium produced differences in the growth patterns of the isolates, with the optimal growth at 0–3.5% (Figure 3). At 48 h, all isolates could grow over the salt range 3.5–5% indicating their high halotolerance. The highest salt concentration (10%) resulted in significant growth suppression (p < 0.05) leading to 0.15, 0.86, and 1.05 log10 CFU ml–1 reductions for L. plantarum strains R2, W30, and B14, respectively. At 8%, the isolates from the blue veins (Figure 3B) and white core (Figure 3C) were more sensitive to salt showing only 0.32 and 0.28 log10 CFU ml–1 increases to final viable counts of 5.7 and 5.9 log10 CFU ml–1, respectively. In comparison, the isolate from the outer crust (Figure 3A) showed a 1.2 log10 CFU ml–1 increase to a final population of 6.5 log10 CFU ml–1.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Salt tolerance of L. plantarum isolates from Stilton cheese: (A) R2, outer crust; (B) B14, blue veins; (C) W30, white core. Assays were performed in MRS broth supplemented with different salt concentrations (%, w/v): (◆) 0, control, (■) 3.5, (▲) 5, (X) 8, and (🌑) 10.

Desiccation Tolerance

Desiccation tolerance was performed in SDW in order to avoid salt stress during desiccation. MRD was included to highlight the protective role of peptone for microbial cells subjected to drying conditions. This would allow evaluation of nutrients as a potential risk factor for persistence and subsequent colonization of Lactobacillus in the cheese production environment which is the most likely source of cross-contamination onto the outer crust. The isolates varied in sensitivity to initial drying (30°C) prior to desiccation at 20°C, and this depended on the medium in which the cells were suspended (data not shown; Mugampoza, 2013). Suspending cells in MRD caused slight reduction (0.43–0.57 log10 CFU ml–1) in viable counts whereas in SDW, a higher reduction (0.67–1.13 log10 CFU ml–1) was observed. In these media, L. plantarum strain W30 (white core) was the most tolerant to the initial drying step compared with R2 and B14 from the outer crust and blue veins, respectively (data not shown; Mugampoza, 2013).

Over 7 days at equilibrated humidity, the sensitivity of the isolates to desiccation stress varied depending on the RH applied and the medium in which the cells were dried (Figure 4). All isolates were sensitive at 33% RH in SDW and became undetectable by 5 days of exposure. All isolates survived desiccation at this RH in MRD over 7 days suggesting cellular protection by MRD. L. plantarum strains R2 and W30 showed a 3 log10 CFU ml–1 reduction over this period whereas B14 showed a further 1 log10 CFU ml–1 reduction in survival. Survival was higher at 54% RH although after 7 days only W30 showed significant levels of survival in SDW.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Desiccation tolerance of L. plantarum isolates from Stilton cheese: (A) R2, outer crust; (B) B14, blue veins; (C) W30, white core. The cells were exposed at 20°C to different % relative humidity (RH) levels when suspended in maximum recovery diluent (MRD) or sterile distilled water (SDW): (◆) 33% RH in MRD, (▲) 54% RH in MRD, (■) 54% RH in SDW, and (🌑) 33% RH in SDW.

In MRD, all isolates were sensitive and died off by 7 days with the greatest inactivation occurring between 5 and 7 days. In SDW, L. plantarum R2 from the outer crust (Figure 4A) was more sensitive and survived for only 5 days. The isolate from the blue veins B14 (Figure 4B) showed a low survival level (0.6 log10 CFU ml–1) by 7 days but W30 from the white core (Figure 4C) showed better tolerance with 4.2 log10 CFU ml–1 survival up to 7 days. Overall, survival was better at 33% RH in MRD than all other treatments (p < 0.05). Therefore, it was concluded that survival of L. plantarum is dependent on RH, the drying medium and the strain.

Heat Tolerance

Lactobacillus plantarum was heat-treated for 70 s at 72°C in cows’ milk in order to establish their sensitivity during pasteurization. The thermal inactivation of stationary phase L. plantarum R2 (outer crust) resulted in undetectable levels after 50 s of heat treatment whereas B14 (blue veins) and W30 (white core) could be recovered after 70 s, although they only grew on the non-selective BHI agar and not the selective MRS agar, which was indicative of heat injury (Figure 5). The differences in D72°C values for L. plantarum strains R2 (6.9 s, r2 = 0.92), B14 (20.7 s, r2 = 0.95), and W30 (23.6 s, r2 = 0.98) were significant (p < 0.05). The greater heat sensitivity of the outer crust isolate is suggestive that this geno-group of L. plantarum could have entered into the cheese post-pasteurization, which is also consistent with their location on the surface of the cheese. The calculated D72°C values for L. plantarum B14 and W30 obtained from the inner cheese matrix (20.7 and 23.6 s, respectively) shows that there would be a less than 1 log10 reduction in cell numbers for these isolates during a standard pasteurization over 15 s.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Thermal inactivation kinetics of L. plantarum isolates from Stilton cheese heated in milk at 72 ± 1°C: (▲) W30 white core, (■) B14 blue veins, (◆) R2 outer crust. Values are means of two independent determinations and error bars represent ± standard errors. 100% survival corresponds with 8.21, 8.57, and 8.73 log10 CFU ml–1 for L. plantarum R2, B14 and W30, respectively. The come-up time was monitored using a thermocouple in a spare sample tube.

After cold storage of the heat-treated samples (4°C, 48 h), part of the cell population recovered from the heat injury as manifested by an increased colony count on the non-selective BHI agar (Figure 6) but not on MRS agar; this is typical of sublethally injured cells being present as part of the bacterial population. On BHI agar, a significant recovery (p < 0.05) was observed for L. plantarum R2 (outer crust; from <1 to 2.7 log10 CFU ml–1) and W30 (white core; from 4.3 to 5.1 log10 CFU ml–1). The increase in cell number was due to recovery and not growth as the corresponding non-heat-treated (control) isolates showed no growth in milk over 48 h at 4°C (Supplementary Figure S1). This was true for cells inoculated at three different count levels (107, 104, and 102 CFU ml–1).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Recovery of stationary phase cells of L. plantarum isolates (initial inoculum, 9 log10 CFU ml–1) heated for 70 s at 72°C and incubated in sterile milk at 4°C for: (□) 0, (■) 24, and (■) 48 h. Values are means of two independent determinations and error bars represent ± standard errors. Strains: R4 (outer crust), B14 (blue veins), W30 (white core); three independent replicates (-1, -2, and -3) were tested for each strain.

Antimicrobial Activity of Cells

Agar overlays were used to evaluate the spectrum of antimicrobial activity for 50 L. plantarum isolates from the different cheese sites (Supplementary Table S4). Each of the Lactobacillus isolates showed activity against more than one species but the number of sensitive species varied with the Lactobacillus isolate and its site of isolation. All isolates produced inhibitory activity against L. pentosus, Ps. aeruginosa, E. coli, and L. monocytogenes, whereas only some showed activity against Staphylococcus aureus (92%) and Salmonella Typhimurium (96%) and none showed activity against Clostridium sporogenes. Of the seven isolates tested from the outer crust, strains R5 and R6 had a weaker activity against E. coli and L. lactis whereas R1 had no activity against S. aureus. L. plantarum strains R22, R23, and R37 exerted no activity against S. aureus. Similar results were obtained for L. plantarum strains B30 and W13 toward Sal. Typhimurium. The isolates from the outer crust had the highest level of antimicrobial activity with only C. sporogenes and S. aureus showing some resistance to these lactobacilli. The data indicated that the isolates could produce different antimicrobials active against a broad range of bacterial species including lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as well as other Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. As L. plantarum usually produces plantaricins with activity only against closely related LAB (Diep et al., 2009), activity against other bacterial species may be attributed to other mechanisms.

Antimicrobial Activity of Cell-Free Supernatants

Using the paper diffusion assay, cell-free supernatants of all the 50 L. plantarum isolates were screened for antimicrobial activity against L. pentosus, L. monocytogenes, E. coli, and Ps. aeruginosa as these were the most sensitive strains from the agar overlay assay. This protocol allowed for comparison of results obtained using the overlay method and also eliminated the possibility of competition for nutrients through L. plantarum growth being an inhibitory factor for the sensitive strains. For all Lactobacillus isolates, the cell-free supernatant (CFS) had a narrow spectrum of activity and only showed inhibitory reactions against E. coli and Ps. aeruginosa (data not shown; Mugampoza, 2013). The CFS could not inhibit the growth of L. monocytogenes and only formed a small faint halo regarded as negative for this indicator bacterium. Further examination of the CFS on closely related LAB strains demonstrated that seven (of the 50) isolates had inhibitory activity against L. pentosus (Supplementary Table S5), but none was inhibitory against other LAB strains including L. mesenteroides, L. plantarum NCIMB 138914, L. lactis, Lactobacillus fermentum, and Streptococcus thermophilus (data not shown; Mugampoza, 2013). The CFS with activity against L. pentosus was only obtained from Lactobacillus isolated from the blue veins and white core. These results suggested that, under our experimental conditions, the CFS of L. plantarum isolates could only show antagonism against Gram-negative bacteria and closely related members of the LAB group such as L. pentosus. The greatest inhibition, i.e., halos > 2 mm, was obtained when the isolates were grown for 24 h at 30°C at 100 rev min–1 in MRS broth supplemented with at least 0.6% glucose. These conditions were then employed to obtain CFS which was treated to neutralize acids and hydrogen peroxide in order to identify the mechanism of activity (Supplementary Table S6).

Cell-free supernatant adjusted to pH 6.5-7 (CFS-N) and catalase-treated CFS (CFS-C) from L. plantarum isolates R36, R37, and R38 formed smaller halos (1–2 mm) than the control CFS (2 mm), whereas the corresponding CFS from L. plantarum isolates R23, R42, and R45 had halos greater than 2 mm. Reduction in activity when CFS-N and CFS-C were applied suggested that this activity was, in part, due to production of acid and hydrogen peroxide. For all isolates (except R39), catalase-treated CFS adjusted to pH 6.5-7 (CFS-N-C) formed halos of 1–2 mm. A decrease in activity from this treatment was only noted from L. plantarum isolates R23 and R42. This indicates that acids and hydrogen peroxide produced by these isolates had similar levels of activity which was reduced upon removal of both antimicrobials. Thus, treated and untreated CFS retained some activity implying bioactive substances, additional to acids and hydrogen peroxide, were produced. CFS treated with the proteolytic enzyme proteinase K lost activity suggesting that a key part of the antagonism was due to a proteinaceous bacteriocin.

Prevalence and Expression of Bacteriocin Genes

In this work, 54 L. plantarum isolates were screened for the presence of plantaricin N, EF, and JK genes using PCR. None of the genes for plantaricins N and JK were detected. However, 35 of the 54 isolates were found to harbor the plantaricin EF genes (data not shown; Mugampoza, 2013). The genes were mostly (6 out of 7) found among the isolates from the outer crust and were least (15 out of 32) frequently detected in isolates from the white core (Figure 1). These findings correlated with the results from the agar overlay assay which showed that Lactobacillus isolates from the outer crust had a higher level of antimicrobial activity. All isolates found to contain the plantaricin EF (plnEF) genes also expressed some antimicrobial activity, albeit at a lower level. This was the case for L. plantarum strains B30, W13 and W30. Presence of the plnEF genes showed some correspondence with the data from CFS studies. For instance, neutralized and catalase-treated CFS from isolates that had some activity against L. pentosus were also found to harbor this gene, suggesting its expression. However, despite the high prevalence of the gene among the isolates from the outer crust, none of these lactobacilli showed activity in the CFS, implying failure to express the genes.

Discussion

The identification of bacterial isolates from Stilton revealed the dominance of L. plantarum in the LAB species from different cheese sections. Stilton is made from pasteurized milk and should, therefore, be free from non-starter LAB, while L. lactis, which is added as starter culture, could not be isolated from the ripened product. This is in agreement with the findings of Ercolini et al. (2003) who reported the presence of this starter culture bacterium in PCR-DGGE profiles from the cheese and from culture plates showing confluent growth but not from plates in the countable range. Cogan et al. (2007) and Hayaloglu (2016) stated that NSLAB identified in most ripened blue cheese varieties made from raw or pasteurized milk are facultative homofermentative lactobacilli that include Lactobacillus casei, L. plantarum, and L. curvatus, all of which normally grow from levels of 102–104 to ∼108 CFU g–1 by the end of ripening. Ares-Yebra et al. (2019) also reported that lactic acid bacteria from a traditional Azorean cheese are dominated by L. plantarum, while Dolci et al. (2008) highlighted that L. plantarum and L. paracasei are the dominant species in ripened Castelmagno cheese. In Stilton, L. plantarum could have been introduced into the cheese matrix from various routes: thermoduric strains in milk which survive pasteurization (Briggiler-Marco et al., 2007), strains introduced from equipment during curd milling and cheese piercing prior to packaging, or strains introduced onto the outer crust from the processing plant environment and handlers during ripening.

Biochemical profiles in combination with PFGE patterns revealed variation in the sugar utilization patterns of the isolates belonging to the same species, implying the presence of different geno-groups of these organisms within each of the cheese sites. Although PFGE clustered L. brevis with L. plantarum in cluster III, suggesting low compatibility of the methodologies, phenotypic characteristics were congruent with the genotyping data including PFGE profiling and 16S rDNA sequence analysis (Mugampoza, 2013, Appendix 8).

Given that PFGE grouping generated at 52% similarity (Tenover et al., 1995) was based on site of isolation (crust, core, and blue veins) and since preliminary experiments revealed little variation in growth characteristics of L. plantarum isolates obtained from the same cheese site (data not shown), only isolates coming from different PFGE clusters and cheese sites were tested for stress tolerance. As the selected isolates (R2, outer crust; B14, blue veins; and W30, white core) had faster growth in milk and had different biochemical profiles measured using API, it was anticipated that these isolates, could also show phenotypic differences including stress tolerance and other technological aspects. Indeed, the results in Figures 2–5 revealed diversity in Lactobacillus from a single Stilton cheese.

Lactobacillus plantarum isolates evidenced good survival at different levels of acid, salt, relative humidity, and heat treatment showing that they can have optimal adaptability in the cheese microenvironment where conditions are normally unfavorable for microbial growth. The data highlighted that Lactobacillus in a Stilton cheese represents a mixed species with strains at different sites selected on the basis of their stress tolerances. Randazzo et al. (2002); Duthoit et al. (2003) and Sawitzki et al. (2009) proposed that occurrence, in cheese, of multiple strains of LAB belonging to the same species is, in most cases, the result of ecological selection following introduction into the cheese which may explain our data. Thus, strains in the core which showed greater heat resistance may have come from the original milk and survived pasteurization; these were also more acid tolerant and therefore able to survive the lower pH found in the cheese core. In contrast those on the outer crust were more heat sensitive and could have been introduced post-pasteurization onto the surface by handling or from environmental sources. These latter were more desiccation tolerant and thus show greater ability to be retained in the production environment. Similar studies were performed by Welsh (2000) on Rhizobium spp., Succi et al. (2005) on Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Pelinescu et al. (2009) on Lactobacillus and Enterococcus strains. All these authors reported optimal survival following exposure to stress conditions relevant to the site of isolation. In all cases, long-term exposure to stronger stresses caused significant loss of survival which is similar to the findings in this study.

Lund et al. (2000) critiqued the different approaches to determine D-values in milk for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis and pointed out that there is no best approach to estimate D-values in milk simulating the effects of a commercial pasteuriser. Thus, the submerged tube method used in this study would not relate the D-values obtained with industrial process, but rather used to determine the relative heat sensitivity of different L. plantarum isolates. However, there is a need to overcome the problem of come-up time during heat stress studies which could have affected results in our experimental model. Further research in preheated milk, or use of sealed capillary tubes could be employed (Chung et al., 2007).

Some of the L. plantarum isolates could produce the heat-stable plantaricin EF bacteriocins. The bacteriocins were only active against L. pentosus. The result was in agreement with the relatively narrow inhibitory spectrum reported for plantaricins (Nissen-Meyer et al., 1993; Diep et al., 2009), mostly being active against bacterial species closely related to the producer L. plantarum strains. However, most of the isolates had a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity against the Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria on solid medium. Presence of the plnEF genes showed no association with the PFGE clusters (Supplementary Figure S2). For instance, cluster I contained the highest number of genetically similar L. plantarum isolates suggesting they were clones of a single strain. However, plnEF data highlighted some variations within this cluster; even closely related isolates within sub-clusters obtained from the same site gave different results. For example, in cluster I, the first sub-cluster of four isolates which formed at a similarity level of 67% contained the isolates B15/B30 which were negative for plnEF and R23/R42b which were positive for these genes. However, identical genotypes gave the same plnEF gene results as evident for isolates B27/B28/W9 and W12/W13. Thus, a PFGE geno-group did not define a single identical strain. Therefore, it was concluded that there were different strains or sub-populations of L. plantarum in the Stilton sample examined. Some strains were found at more than one site but others were site-specific which was in agreement with previous studies on the diversity of Lactobacillus strains (Zapparoli et al., 1998; Girrafa and Neviani, 1999; Sanchez et al., 2004; Vancanneyt et al., 2006). Future research may employ whole genome sequencing and/or multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) to provide more insight about the clonal relationship between Lactobacillus isolates used in this study with those of other authors.

Conclusion

The dynamic and complex microenvironments in different sites of Stilton cheese seem to play a major role in selecting for different strains of Lactobacillus. Because these organisms are fortuitously introduced into Stilton cheese, this could be a source of product quality inconsistencies as pointed out by Montel et al. (2014). Whereas the drawbacks of NSLAB as culture adjuncts in cheese were pointed out by Gobbetti et al. (2015), the observed properties of L. plantarum isolates could be of interest in developing Lactobacillus starters and starter culture adjuncts with improved resistance to multiple stresses for several applications including probiotics, where growth under harsh stress conditions would be an attribute. Use of L. plantarum as a starter culture adjunct for Stilton cheese would need to take the varying phenotypes into consideration.

However, our results were obtained at laboratory scale from a single cheese taken at a single time point and from a single source. Transcriptome and proteome studies coupled with microarray analysis may be applied to validate whether or not stress tolerance of our isolates could be triggered by transient exposure to a wide range of sub-lethal factors including acid, salt, drying and oxidative stress at different gradients within the cheese matrix. Elucidation of these mechanisms would add to the understanding of how the organism survives the cheese ripening process and would enable a more targeted approach to non-starter culture adjunct selection for quality improvement, maintenance and reliability of Stilton cheese production. As the primer set used for 16S rRNA gene sequencing of our Lactobacillus isolates was short (448 bp), further research could employ a primer set that covers the complete 16S gene to generate more stringent identification of the lactobacilli.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author Contributions

The study was conceived and designed by DM, KG, and CD who all contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data and writing of the manuscript. BS and CR devised the methodology for the heat inactivation and recovery experiments. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by Islamic Development Bank (Grant No: 27528-94062645). The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The content of this work first appeared in the thesis by DM (2013) titled ‘characterisation of the Non-starter Bacterial Flora of Stilton Cheese’ which represents the only medium it has appeared in, in line with the University of Nottingham policy, and can be accessed online. The authors are grateful to Dr. Shao-Hung Wei and Dr. Andrew Timms for their technical assistance. Kyambogo University (Uganda) allowed DM to take a study leave-with-pay during the course of the study.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00904/full#supplementary-material

References

Ahmed, N. M., Conner, D. E., and Huffman, D. L. (1995). Heat-resistance of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in meat and poultry as affected by product composition. J. Food Sc. 60, 606–610.

Google Scholar

Albano, H., Oliveira, M., Aroso, R., ria Cubero, N., Hogg, T., and Teixeira, P. (2007). Anti-listerial activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from “Alheiras” (traditional Portuguese fermented sausages): in situ assays. Meat Sci. 76, 796–800. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.01.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ares-Yebra, A., Garabal, J. I., Carballo, J., and Centeno, J. A. (2019). Formation of conjugated linoleic acid by a Lactobacillus plantarum strain isolated from an artisanal cheese: evaluation in miniature cheeses. Int. Dairy J. 90, 98–103.

Google Scholar

Briggiler-Marco, M., Capra, M. L., Quiberoni, A., Vinderola, G., Reinheimer, J. A., and Hynes, E. (2007). Nonstarter Lactobacillus strains as adjunct cultures for cheese making: in vitro characterization and performance in two model cheeses. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 4532–4542. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Broadbent, J. R., Houck, K., Johnson, M. E., and Oberg, C. J. (2003). Influence of adjunct use and cheese microenvironment on nonstarter bacteria in reduced-fat Cheddar-type cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 2773–2782. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73874-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Catte, M., Gancel, F., Dzierszinski, F., and Tailliez, R. (1999). Effects of water activity, NaCl and smoke concentrations on the growth of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 12315. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 52, 105–108. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(99)00118-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cho, G. S., Huch, M., Hanak, A., Holzapfel, W. H., and Franz, C. M. A. P. (2010). Genetic analysis of the plantaricin EFI locus of Lactobacillus plantarum PCS20 reveals an unusual plantaricin E gene sequence as a result of mutation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 141, 117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.02.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chung, H. J., Shaojin Wang, S., and Juming Tang, J. (2007). Influence of heat transfer with tube methods on measured thermal inactivation parameters for Escherichia coli. J. Food Prot. 70, 851–859. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-70.4.851

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cogan, T. M., Beresford, T. P., Steele, J., Broadbent, J., Shah, N. P., and Ustunol, Z. (2007). Invited review: advances in starter cultures and cultured foods. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 4005–4021. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Collins, C. H., Lyne, P. M., Grange, J. M., and Falkinham, J. O. (2004). Collins and Lyne’s Microbiological Methods, 8th Edn. London: Arnold, 89–107.

Google Scholar

Diep, D. B., Straume, K. M., Torres, C., and Nes, I. F. (2009). An overview of the mosaic bacteriocin pln loci from Lactobacillus plantarum. Peptides 30, 1562–1574. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.05.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dolci, P., Alessandria, V., Rantsiou, K., Rolle, L., Zeppa, G., and Cocolin, L. (2008). Microbial dynamics of Castelmagno PDO, a traditional Italian cheese, with a focus on lactic acid bacteria ecology. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 122, 302–311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duthoit, F., Godon, J. J., and Montel, M. C. (2003). Bacterial community dynamics during production of registered designation of origin salers cheese as evaluated by 16S rRNA gene single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 3840–3848. doi: 10.1128/aem.69.7.3840-3848.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ercolini, D., Hill, P. J., and Dodd, C. E. R. (2003). Bacterial community structure and location in Stilton cheese. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 3540–3548. doi: 10.1128/aem.69.6.3540-3548.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., and Quattro, J. M. (1992). Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes - application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 479–491.

Google Scholar

Girrafa, G., and Neviani, E. (1999). Different Lactobacillus helveticus strain populations dominate during Grana Padano cheesemaking. Food Microbiol. 16, 205–210.

Google Scholar

Gkatzionis, K., Hewson, L., Hollowood, T., Hort, J., Dodd, C. E. R., and Linforth, R. S. T. (2013). Effect of Yarrowia lipolytica on blue cheese odour development: flash profile sensory evaluation of microbiological models and cheeses. Int. Dairy J. 30, 8–13.

Google Scholar

Gkatzionis, K., Linforth, R. S. T., and Dodd, C. E. R. (2009). Volatile profile of Stilton cheeses: differences between zones within a cheese and dairies. Food Chem. 113, 506–512.

Google Scholar

Gkatzionis, K., Yunita, D., Linforth, R. S. T., Dickinson, M., and Dodd, C. E. R. (2014). Diversity and activities of yeasts from different parts of a Stilton cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 177, 109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.02.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gobbetti, M., De Angelis, M., Di Cagno, R., Mancini, L., and Fox, P. F. (2015). Pros and cons for using non-starter lactic acid bacteria (NSLAB) as secondary/adjunct starters for cheese ripening. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 45, 167–178.

Google Scholar

Hayaloglu, A. A. (2016). Cheese: Microbiology of Cheese. Reference Module in Food Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1–11.

Google Scholar

Hiscox, E. R., Harrison, J., and Wolf, J. Z. (1940). The microflora of Stilton cheese. J. Appl. Microbiol. 3, 23–26.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Lopez, I., Ruiz-Larrea, F., Cocolin, L., Orr, E., Phister, T., Marshall, M., et al. (2003). Design and evaluation of PCR primers for analysis of bacterial populations in wine by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 6801–6807. doi: 10.1128/aem.69.11.6801-6807.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lund, B. M., Donnelly, C. W., and Rampling, A. (2000). Heat resistance of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 31, 184–185.

Google Scholar

Madkor, S., Fox, P. F., Shalabi, S. I., and Metwalli, N. H. (1987). Studies on the ripening of stilton cheese: proteolysis. Food Chem. 25, 13–29.

Google Scholar

Montel, C. M., Buchin, S., Mallet, A., Delbes-Paus, C., Vuitton, D. A., Desmasures, N., et al. (2014). Diversity between cheeses is due particularly to wide variations in the dynamics of the same species in different cheeses. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 177, 136–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.02.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moore, M. A., and Datta, A. R. (1994). DNA fingerprinting of Listeria monocytogenes strains by pulse-field gel electrophoresis. J. Food Microbiol. 11, 31–38.

Google Scholar

Mugampoza, D. (2013). Characterisation of the Non-Starter Bacterial Flora of Stilton Cheese. Thesis, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham.

Google Scholar

Nissen-Meyer, J., Larsen, A. G., Sletten, K., Daeschel, M., and Nes, I. F. (1993). Purification and characterization of plantaricin A, a Lactobacillus plantarum bacteriocin whose activity depends on the action of two peptides. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139, 1973–1978. doi: 10.1099/00221287-139-9-1973

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pedersen, T. B., Olsen, J. E., and Bisgaard, M. (2008). Persistence of Salmonella senftenberg in poultry production environments and investigation of its resistance to desiccation. Avian. Pathol. 37, 421–427. doi: 10.1080/03079450802216561

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pelinescu, D. R., Sasarman, E., Chifiriuc, M. C., Stoica, I., Nohit, A. M., Avram, I., et al. (2009). Isolation and identification of some Lactobacillus and Enterococcus strains by a polyphasic taxonomical approach. Rom Biotech. Lett. 14, 4225–4233.

Google Scholar

Pitcher, D. G., Saunders, N. A., and Owen, R. J. (1989). Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 8, 151–156.

Google Scholar

Powell, J. E., Witthuhn, R. C., Todorov, S. D., and Dicks, L. M. T. (2007). Characterization of bacteriocin ST8KF produced by a kefir isolate Lactobacillus plantarum ST8KF. Int. Dairy J. 17, 190–198.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Price, E., Linforth, R. S. T., Dodd, C. E. R., Phillips, C. A., Hewson, L., Hort, J., et al. (2013). Study of the influence of yeast inoculum concentration (Yarrowia lipolytica and Kluyveromyces lactis) on blue cheese aroma development using microbiological models. Food Chem. 145, 464–472. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.08.081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Randazzo, C. L., Torriani, S., Akkermans, A. D. L., de Vos, W. M., and Vaughan, E. E. (2002). Diversity, dynamics, and activity of bacterial communities during production of an artisanal Sicilian cheese as evaluated by 16S rRNA analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 1882–1892. doi: 10.1128/aem.68.4.1882-1892.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanchez, I., Sesena, S., and Palop, L. L. (2004). Polyphasic study of the genetic diversity of lactobacilli associated with ‘Almagro’ eggplants spontaneous fermentation, based on combined numerical analysis of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97, 446–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02324.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sawitzki, M. C., Fiorentini, A. M., Bertol, T. M., and Sant’Anna, E. S. (2009). Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from naturally fermented sausages and their technological properties for application as starter cultures. Ciência Tecnol. Alim. 29, 340–345.

Google Scholar

Sharpe, M. E., and Brindley, M. (1956). Lactobacilli isolated from the surface of normal and slipcoat Stilton cheese. J. Dairy Res. 23, 361–362.

Google Scholar

Succi, M., Tremonte, P., Reale, A., Sorrentino, E., Grazia, L., Pacifico, S., et al. (2005). Bile salt and acid tolerance of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains isolated from Parmigiano Reggiano cheese. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 244, 129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.01.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Swift, B. (2010). An Investigation of Gram-Positive Pathogens in Powdered Foods. MRes thesis, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham.

Google Scholar

Tenover, F. C., Arbeit, R. D., Goering, R. V., Mickelsen, P. A., Murray, B. E., Persing, D. H., et al. (1995). Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 2233–2239.

Google Scholar

Torriani, S., Felis, G. E., and Dellaglio, F. (2001). Differentiation of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. pentosus, and L. paraplantarum by recA gene sequence analysis and multiplex PCR assay with recA gene-derived primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 3450–3454. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.8.3450-3454.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turroni, F., Foroni, E., Pizzetti, P., Giubellini, V., Ribbera, A., Merusi, P., et al. (2009). Exploring the diversity of the Bifidobacterial population in the human intestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 1534–1545. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02216-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vancanneyt, M., Huys, G., Lefebvre, K., Vankerckhoven, V., Goossens, H., and Swings, J. (2006). Intraspecific genotypic characterization of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains intended for probiotic use and isolates of human origin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5376–5383.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Welsh, D. T. (2000). Ecological significance of compatible solute accumulation by microorganisms: from single cells to global climate. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 24, 263–290.

Google Scholar

Whitley, E. (2002). The Microflora of Blue Stilton Cheese. Thesis, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham.

Google Scholar

Yeung, P. S. M., Kitts, C. L., Cano, R., Tong, P. S., and Sanders, M. E. (2004). Application of genotypic and phenotypic analyses to commercial probiotic strain identity and relatedness. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97, 1095–1104.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Yi, H., Zhang, L., Tuo, Y., Han, X., and Du, M. (2010). A novel method for rapid detection of class IIa bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria. Food Cont. 21, 426–430.

Google Scholar

Yunita, D., and Dodd, C. E. R. (2018). Microbial community dynamics of a blue-veined raw milk cheese from the United Kingdom. J. Dairy Sci. 101, 4923–4935. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zapparoli, G., Torriani, S., and Dellaglio, F. (1998). Differentiation of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis strains by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 166, 325–332.

Google Scholar

Keywords: Stilton cheese, Lactobacillus, PFGE, antimicrobial activity, stress tolerance, plantaricin EF genes

Citation: Mugampoza D, Gkatzionis K, Swift BMC, Rees CED and Dodd CER (2020) Diversity of Lactobacillus Species of Stilton Cheese Relates to Site of Isolation. Front. Microbiol. 11:904. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00904

Received: 07 May 2019; Accepted: 16 April 2020;
Published: 12 May 2020.

Edited by:

Giovanna Suzzi, University of Teramo, Italy

Reviewed by:

Maria Aponte, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
Beatrix Stessl, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
Paola Mattarelli, University of Bologna, Italy
Folarin Anthony Oguntoyinbo, Appalachian State University, United States

Copyright © 2020 Mugampoza, Gkatzionis, Swift, Rees and Dodd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Diriisa Mugampoza, mugampoza@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.