Nutritional Intervention for the Intestinal Development and Health of Weaned Pigs
Xia Xiong
Bie Tan
Minho Song2 
Peng Ji
Kwangwook Kim
Yanhong Liu- 1Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, China
- 2Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea
- 3Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
- 4Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
Weaning imposes simultaneous stress, resulting in reduced feed intake, and growth rate, and increased morbidity and mortality of weaned pigs. Weaning impairs the intestinal integrity, disturbs digestive and absorptive capacity, and increases the intestinal oxidative stress, and susceptibility of diseases in piglets. The improvement of intestinal development and health is critically important for enhancing nutrient digestibility capacity and disease resistance of weaned pigs, therefore, increasing their survival rate at this most vulnerable stage, and overall productive performance during later stages. A healthy gut may include but not limited several important features: a healthy proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells, an integrated gut barrier function, a preferable or balanced gut microbiota, and a well-developed intestinal mucosa immunity. Burgeoning evidence suggested nutritional intervention are one of promising measures to enhance intestinal health of weaned pigs, although the exact protective mechanisms may vary and are still not completely understood. Previous research indicated that functional amino acids, such as arginine, cysteine, glutamine, or glutamate, may enhance intestinal mucosa immunity (i.e., increased sIgA secretion), reduce oxidative damage, stimulate proliferation of enterocytes, and enhance gut barrier function (i.e., enhanced expression of tight junction protein) of weaned pigs. A number of feed additives are marketed to assist in boosting intestinal immunity and regulating gut microbiota, therefore, reducing the negative impacts of weaning, and other environmental challenges on piglets. The promising results have been demonstrated in antimicrobial peptides, clays, direct-fed microbials, micro-minerals, milk components, oligosaccharides, organic acids, phytochemicals, and many other feed additives. This review summarizes our current understanding of nutritional intervention on intestinal health and development of weaned pigs and the importance of mechanistic studies focusing on this research area.
Introduction
Weaning is the most challenging stage that has significant bearings on pig welfare and growth performance in swine industry. During weaning period, piglets are immediately imposed to a number of environmental and psychosocial stressors that predispose them to diarrhea and gut damage, which can adversely impact their survival at a very early and most vulnerable stage. The post-weaning mortality ratio is 6–10%, but sometime may rise up to 20%. Thus, in the last decade, animal nutritionists have made great effort to optimize feed formulation to meet requirement of newly weaned pigs, and to explore different nutritional factors or management that focus on promoting the overall health of weaned pigs. In addition, antibiotics used to be a powerful component in the herd health programs for protecting weaned pig health. It has been reported that global consumption of antibiotics in livestock production was estimated at 63,151 tons in 2010 and is projected to increase by 67% by 2030 (1). In the U.S., antibiotics use in livestock industry is estimated to account for 71% of the nation's annual antibiotic consumption (2). However, these practices also contribute to the spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens in both livestock and humans, rising a significant public health threat. Use of in-feed antibiotics for production purpose in livestock industry is completely banned in the U.S. (3) starting in January 2017, which is remarkably increasing the challenge of keeping pigs healthy, especially in post-weaning period. Therefore, another urgent need in animal science society is to develop strategies to replace antibiotics for food-producing animals without hampering animal production. Although the manipulation of genetics, management, and health also plays substantially important role in protecting animal health and promoting their production performance, in the current review, we only focus on nutritional interventions on intestinal health of weaned pigs.
Weaning Stress on Intestinal Development and Health
Many factors contribute to post-weaning stress, including hierarchy stress, new housing environment, transferring to solid feed, and others (4). Weaning stress is generally companying with reduced feed intake, poor growth performance, as well as increased disease susceptibility (5, 6). Weaning stress also negatively impacts intestinal development, physiology, microflora, and immunity as thoroughly discussed by other review articles (7–9). The focus of this review is to briefly highlight weaning stress on intestinal development and health by adding more recently published research.
Weaning Stress on Pig Intestinal Physiology
Intestinal epithelium is characterized by rapidly proliferating cells in crypts, which then invaginating into the underlying mesenchyme and villi (10). The intestinal epithelial cells continuously and rapidly turn over in 4 to 5 days (11). The stem cells in crypts produce proliferating transit-amplifying cells that undergo a series of transitions, and ultimately differentiate into four differentiated cell types comprising one type of absorptive (enterocytes) and three types of secretory cell lineages (enteroendocrine cells, goblet cells, and paneth cells) (12). Absorptive enterocytes constitute up to 90% of epithelial cells in the crypt-villus axis (13). Paneth cells migrate to the base of crypts, whereas enteroendocrine cells and goblet cells migrate to villi (14). The proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells play important roles in intestinal development, maintenance, and recovery from tissue damage (7).
Several recently published research articles revealed the impacts of weaning stress on the expression of proteins and metabolites in enterocytes of piglets (15–20). Weaning significantly down-regulated the expression of proteins involved in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, β-oxidation, and the glycolysis pathway in the upper villus and middle villus of the jejunum in early-weaned pigs, but up-regulated proteins involved in glycolysis in crypt cells (15). During the post-weaning period, the expression of proteins related to various cellular metabolic or biological processes, such as energy metabolism, protein amino acid glycosylation, ion transport, mTOR signaling pathway, and differentiation and apoptosis, were reduced in jejunal differentiated epithelial cells (villus upper cells) of piglets (17). Proteins involved in the respiratory electron transport chain, Golgi vesicle transport, protein glycosylation, as well as the metabolism of nutrient such as lipids, monosaccharides, and nucleotides were also down-regulated in the jejunal differentiating epithelial cells (the middle villi cells) of piglets during the post-weaning period (20). These results indicated that weaning influenced energy metabolism, cellular macromolecule organization and localization, and protein metabolism, thereby further impacted the proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells in weaned piglets (18). In addition, polyamine metabolism and ornithine decarboxylase expression were also altered by weaning and may be used as a marker of intestinal growth and restitution in pigs (21).
Weaning stress could also induce tremendous morphological/physiological changes, such as villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia (22, 23), which further disturb the digestive and absorptive capacity and performance of weaned pigs (4, 24). Brush border enzyme activities and electrolytes secretion in the small intestine have been used as important indicators of maturation and digestive capacity in weaned pigs (25, 26). Due to the change of diet, the activities of enzymes at brush border, such as lactase, sucrase, and maltase, are dramatically reduced between 3 and 5 days after weaning (27, 28). The malabsorption of nutrients in the small intestine is exacerbated by the reduced electrolytes absorption and secretion in newly weaned pigs (29).
The epithelial cells and the mucin layer in the small intestine provide the first line of defense to protect weaning pigs from various harmful microorganisms, toxins, or antigens in the intestinal tract (30). Gut permeability is straightly regulated by tight junction proteins, such as zona occludens 1, claudin, and occludin that are expressed by the epithelial cells (31). It has been reported that weaning stress reduced goblet cells number and mucin production, disrupted epithelial barrier function, increased intestinal permeability, lowered tight junction protein expression, and increased disease susceptibility in weaned pigs (32–34). It was observed that the intestinal barrier damage caused by weaning stress was not restored and returned to pre-weaning levels on d 7 post-weaning (35).
Host-Microbial Nutrition Interactions in Post-weaning Gut Microflora Dysbiosis and Diarrhea
Porcine gut microbiome exhibits dynamic composition and diversity that shifts overtime (36, 37). The primary pig gut microbiota at birth was shaped by the sows' milk and featured with more abundance of lactic acid bacteria (38). However, weaning transition reduced the relative abundance of Lactobacillus group, increase Clostridium spp., Prevotella spp., Proteobacteriaceae, and E. coli, resulting in a loss of microbial diversity (39–41).
The composition and diversity of gut microbiota of weaned piglets is also highly impacted by the levels and sources of dietary proteins or fibers that are offered to post-weaning pigs (42). Nutritional interactions between intestinal cells and gut microflora are remarkably important for the recycling and maintenance of gastrointestinal tract nutrient pool (Figure 1) (43–46). In contrast, a balanced nutrient pool is also critical for the renewal and proliferation of intestinal cells, as well as maintaining a balanced microbial community (12, 47). During the post-weaning period, piglets often have sharply reduced feed intake due to weaning stress. Hence, the nutrients for bacterial survival and proliferation is also limited. Pathogenic bacteria are able to utilize special nutrients (i.e., ethanolamine) that cannot be catabolized by commensal bacteria, thereby, enhance the expression of their virulence factors (48, 49). For instance, both Salmonella and enterohemorrhagic E. coli could use ethanolamine as carbon or nitrogen source to gain nutritional advantages in competing with other microflora (12, 48, 50). Enterohemorrhagic E. coli can also utilize fucose to activate type III secretion system, which facilitates the adhesion of those pathogenic bacteria to host enterocytes (46, 51). As a result, weaned piglets are more susceptible to intestinal inflammation and post-weaning diarrhea due to rapid proliferation of pathogenic bacteria and the loss of microbial diversity (52).
Figure 1. Maintenance of intestinal nutrient pool and the pathogenic baceterial specific nutrition metabolism.
Weaning Stress on Intestinal Mucosal Immunity
The barrier-related mucosal homeostasis is very important for the recognition of exogenous dangerous stimuli, but the same time it has to make sure our body is not hypersensitive to innocuous antigens (53). For example, in the intestine, epithelial cells are primarily responsible for fluid secretions and nutrients absorption, as well as providing a selective barrier against noxious antigens in the lumen. The cross-talk between intestinal epithelial cells and underlying lamina propria cells transfers immune-related signals to the local adaptive immunity, which subsequently help to maintain gut immune homeostasis (54).
The neonates are born with few lymphocytes and relatively low expression of co-stimulatory molecules (55, 56). In addition, the neonates also have a biased intestinal adaptive immunity due to a comparatively higher T helper 2 immune response rather than T helper 1 (57). To develop a stable number of lymphocytes in un-weaned pigs, it may take about 6 weeks (58). Therefore, newly weaned pigs at age of 2 to 4 weeks do not have mature intestinal immunity, which increase their disease susceptibility.
The impacts of weaning stress on intestinal immunity has been thoroughly revealed by McCracken et al. (59) and Pié et al. (60). Briefly, there are several major changes in intestinal immunity of weaned pigs compared with pre-weaning pigs. First, weaning sharply increases both intestinal CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in pigs on d 2 post-weaning (59) and enhances mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8) in the middle of jejunum during the first 2 day post-weaning (60). Those observations indicate that weaning induced a transient gut inflammation in pigs. Second, weaning stress up-regulates matrix metalloproteinase (i.e., stromelysin) by activating immune cells in the lamina propria, which may contribute to villus atrophy (59). Third, weaning stress may down-regulate the MHC I expression in jejunal mucosa of pigs, which is possibly due to the increased plasma cortisol concentration (59, 61). Fourth, the concentration of fecal IgA is continuously decreased from day 5 after birth and remained very low until at least 50 days of age, which may enhance the vulnerability of pre- and post-weaning piglets (62).
Weaning Stress on Intestinal Oxidative Status
Weaning stress is also associated with increased oxidation processes, which leads to a high release of free radicals, also called reactive oxygen species [ROS; (63)]. The excessive production of ROS could modify certain cellular proteins and activate the up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which may further negatively affect the expression of tight junction proteins and cause increased gut permeability (64, 65). Animal cells generally have complex and protective mechanisms to against the formation of oxidative stress, including prevention of ROS formation, ROS scavenging antioxidant systems, and elimination and/or reparation of damaged molecules (66). Therefore, the balance between oxidation and anti-oxidation is very important to cell integrity and health.
A series of antioxidant enzymes play critical roles to protect organisms against harmful pro-oxidants (67). For example, superoxide dismutase provides an efficient dismutation of into H2O2, which is scavenged by glutathione peroxidase and catalase (68). A study from Yin et al. (69) thoroughly investigated the impacts of weaning on the development of antioxidant system of pigs. They observed that plasma superoxide dismutase activity was decreased 1 day post-weaning and then gradually recovered at 3, 5, and 7 day post-weaning. They also observed that weaning down-regulated the expression of genes encoded superoxide dismutases (i.e., CuZnSOD and MnSOD) and glutathione peroxidases (i.e., GPx1 and GPx4) in jejunum of piglets (69). A likely reason is that excessive ROS inhibits the phosphorylation and degradation of IκBs and Keap1, which, therefore, stimulates proteasomal degradation of Nrf2 and p65 and suppresses Nrf2 and p65 signals (69, 70).
How to Define a Healthy Gut
A healthy gut is critically important to the overall metabolism, physiology, disease defense, and growth performance of weaned pigs. Recently, the item “gut health” has attracted much attention in the newly weaned pigs due to the negative effects of weaning stress. However, it still lacks a precise and unifying definition of “gut health.” Several review articles have comprehensively summarized timely information for this particular topic in newly weaned piglets (71–74) and provided slightly different definitions on “gut health.” Based on Kogut and Arsenault (71), a healthy gut was defined as the “absence/prevention/avoidance of disease so that the animal is able to perform its physiological functions in order to withstand exogenous and endogenous stressors.” Celi et al. (72) emphasized the importance of effective digestion and absorption of feed, effective structure and function of gut barrier, host interaction with gut microbiota, and effective immune status. The latest publication from Pluske et al. (74) stated that gut health should be more general and described as a generalized condition of homeostasis in the gastrointestinal tract. They remarked that the generalized criteria to assess gut health of weaned pigs could include effective nutrient digestion and absorption, effective waste excretion, a functional and protective gut barrier, a stable and appropriate microbial community, a functional and protective gut immunity, a minimal activation of stress/neural pathways, and the absence of diseases (74). It is not our intention to reiterate all details included in these publications and compare their definitions. In this regard, we completely agree that a healthy gut should enhance the overall capacity/ability of the host to respond and adapt to challenges/stress and should be concomitant with optimal performance as described by Pluske et al. (74).
Nutritional Intervention on Intestinal Development and Health of Weaned Pigs
Many nutritional strategies have been applied to improve health and maximize the production of weaned pigs (75–78). Those strategies include but not limited to: optimization of feed formulation, utilization of low protein diet in post-weaning period, enhancement of feed processing and manufacturing, and supplementation of different feed additives. They are targeting different aims: (1) improvement of nutrient digestion and absorption, (2) regulation gut microbiota to more favorable bacterial species, and (3) immune modulation to enhance disease resistance of weaned pigs. In this review article, we will only focus on the impacts of several selected feed ingredients or additives (functional amino acids, phytochemicals, antimicrobial peptides, and short-chain fatty acids) on intestinal health of weaned pigs. Those feed additives may or may not have nutritional contribution to human or animal, but they play very important roles in health maintenance or regulation. Many other ingredients or additives are also shown promising results in weaned pig health, but will not be covered in the current article.
Functional Amino Acids
A growing body of literature indicates that some of traditionally classified dispensable amino acids, such as, arginine, glutamine, glutamate, and proline play important roles in the regulation of gene expression, intracellular signaling pathways, nutrient metabolism, and oxidative defense (79–81). This group of amino acids is defined as functional amino acids (82). It has been known that the deficiency of a functional amino acid may impair the whole-body homeostasis. For example, dietary deficiency of arginine could result in metabolic, neurological, or reproductive dysfunction (83). The importance of functional amino acids has been thoroughly reviewed by Wu et al. (81) and Wu (84, 85). The major objective of this review section is to highlight recent published research articles focusing on the effects of functional amino acids on intestinal health and development of weaned pigs.
Arginine is remarkably deficient in sow milk (86, 87), but the concentration of arginine in tissue proteins in piglets are relatively higher compared with other amino acids (88). This observation has remarkably increased the research attention in the nutritional significance of arginine. It has been reported that supplementation of L-arginine (0.2 to 1%) enhanced growth performance and alleviated the negative effects of different insults or challenges in young pigs (81, 89–91). Supplementation of 0.4 to 0.8% L-arginine in pre-weaning diet enhanced intestinal growth and development in early post-weaning period (92). In addition, supplementation of 0.6% L-arginine enhanced small intestinal growth, goblet cell number in intestinal mucosa, intestinal heat shock protein-70 expression in weaned pigs (81). Increasing evidence confirmed the positive impacts of arginine on preventing intestinal dysfunction as a substrate for the synthesis of nitric oxide, polyamines, creatine, and protein (93). It was also reported that arginine could improve DNA synthesis and mitochondrial bioenergetics of intestinal epithelial cells, therefore improve the regeneration and repair of the small intestinal mucosa in animals (94). The underlying biochemical mechanisms may be closely related to the activation of PI3k-Akt pathway, mTOR and TLR4 signaling pathways, and/or the enhanced intracellular protein turnover (94, 95). Moreover, the increased nitric oxide from arginine metabolism could also regulate intestinal blood flow, integrity, secretion, and epithelial cell migration (96).
Besides arginine, other functional amino acids in the arginine family, have been also well investigated in the last decades, including glutamine, glutamate, aspartate, proline, etc. For example, it was reported that the administration of proline improved mucosal proliferation, intestinal morphology, as well as tight junction and potassium channel protein expression in early-weaned piglets (97). Dietary supplementation of glutamine was also shown to prevent intestinal atrophy, increase enzyme activities, and promote growth performance of weaned pigs (98). One dipeptide that is composed of glutamine (glycyl-glutamine), appear a great substitute for glutamine to increase intestinal integrity and enzyme activities and growth performance of weaned pigs (99–101). Another dipeptide, alanyl-glutamine, also has the biological effects similar to free glutamine, as regarding their effects on proliferation, mitochondrial respiration, and protein turnover in the porcine intestinal cells (102). Alanyl-glutamine may be another effective substitute for glutamine as energy and protein sources in the intestinal tract, which has to be further investigated with in vivo animal model. Several mechanisms are highly involved in the benefits of glutamine or glutamine dipeptides on intestinal health. First, glutamine, glutamate, and aspartate could provide major fuel for small intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and provide energy required for intestinal ATP-dependent metabolic processes (103). Second, catabolism of glutamine provides precursors for polyamine synthesis, which is important for proliferation, differentiation, and repair of intestinal epithelial cells (104). Third, glutamine is also a major precursor for the synthesis of glutathione, an important antioxidant in cells regulating the homeostasis of free radicals (105, 106). Fourth, glutamine supplementation may enhance intestinal secretory IgA production via regulating the intestinal microbiota and/or T cell-dependent and T cell-independent pathways (107).
Although it is beyond the scope of functional amino acids, several indispensable amino acids, such as tryptophan and sulfur amino acids, have also attracted large attention recently (108–110). A growing evidence has revealed that supplementation of these amino acids beyond the current NRC requirement brought positive effects on intestinal health of weaned pigs by regulating host physiology, metabolism, oxidative status, and immunity (108–110). The modification of gut microbiota and their metabolites by these amino acids was also highly correlated to the enhanced gut barrier functions of weaned pigs (109).
Phytochemicals
Phytochemicals, naturally occurring plant chemicals/metabolites, are one of most powerful candidates as potential alternatives to in-feed antibiotics because of various biological functions. First, most of phytochemicals exhibit a wide spectrum of antibacterial activities against both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, including E. coli, Salmonella, Clostridium, Mycobacterium, etc. (111, 112). Second, certain phytochemicals have been recognized as potential anti-viral agents (113, 114), which is probably beyond provision of antibiotics. Third, the immune-regulatory activities of certain phytochemicals have been identified in both human and animal models (114–118). Last but not the least, phytochemicals could act as antioxidants to remove free radicals from the body and protect animals from oxidative damage (119). Several commonly used phytochemicals and their main components are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Several commonly used phytochemicals and their main components exhibiting different biological activities, modified from Liu (120).
The protective effects of phytochemicals on poultry and livestock have been thoroughly reviewed in Lillehoj et al. (121). Previous research revealed that dietary supplementation of phytochemicals enhanced disease resistance (i.e., reduced frequency of diarrhea) and growth performance (114, 122, 123). These benefits were likely driven by improved gut health, such as, improved intestinal barrier integrity (122, 123). For example, supplementation with phytochemicals extracted from different seasonings improved intestinal villi height and upregulated mRNA expression of the MUC2 gene in ileum (118). Feeding capsicum oleoresin from pepper, turmeric oleoresin or curcumin extracted from ginger up-regulated the expression of genes related to tight junction (e.g., genes encode claudins and occludin) and cell-cell junctions in the ileum of E. coli challenged pigs (118, 124). A recent publication from Yuan et al. (125) also reported that the flavones extracted from the leaves of Eucommia ulmoides enhanced intestinal morphology and integrity of diquat challenged pigs by improved intestinal barrier function.
The immuno-regulatory and antioxidant properties of phytochemicals are also responsible for their positive effects on animal health. Lang et al. (126) reported that garlic extract could inhibit the secretion of chemokines from intestinal epithelial cells, thus suppress the recruitment of various circulating leukocytes into the inflamed tissue. Dietary supplementation of phytochemicals (10 mg/kg of capsicum oleoresin, garlic, or turmeric oleoresin) downregulated the expression of genes related to antigen processing and presentation and other immune response-related pathways, indicating that these phytochemicals may attenuate the immune responses caused by E. coli infection (118). Supplementation of flavones extracted from the leaves of Eucommia ulmoides also alleviated the inflammatory responses of weaned pigs induced by diquat (125). Several commonly used phytochemicals (extracts from oregano, thyme, ginger, fennel, pepper, clove, basil, cinnamon, garlic, mint etc.) are also showing strong antioxidant activities in both in vitro cell culture and in vivo animal models (127–130). The antioxidant property of phytochemicals is mainly associated with the phenolic compounds that have high reactivity with peroxyl radicals, which are free radical species for the oxidation of proteins and lipids (131, 132). Otherwise, surfur-containing volatiles in garlic extracts express strong antioxidant activity due to the formation of unstable degradation products as radicals-trapping agents (129). However, limited research have been reported the effects of phytochemicals on intestinal oxidative status/responses of weaned pigs.
Antimicrobial Peptides
Antimicrobial peptides, also known as host defense peptides, have been considered as potential alternatives to antibiotics in livestock and poultry (133–135). Antimicrobial peptides are polypeptides, naturally produced by different organisms from prokaryotes to mammals. Therefore, antimicrobial peptides could be directly isolated from bacteria, insects, plants, and vertebrates, or could be synthesized as recombinant molecules (136). They are small and positively charged, and contain both hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions. The majority of antimicrobial peptides are belonged to either defensins or cathelicidin family, whereas defensins are further divided into α-, β-, θ-defensins on the basis of the spacing patterns of their cysteine residues (134). Compared with cathelicidins that are highly expressed in mammalian neutrophils, defensins are more abundant in epithelial and phagocytic cells in different tissues, including intestinal mucosa (137).
Antimicrobial peptides possess a strong and large-spectrum activity against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, fungi, parasites, and viruses (138). Compared with traditional antibiotics, one obvious advantage of antimicrobial peptides is they could kill pathogenic bacteria (e.g., P. aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus) that are resistant to specific antibiotics (134, 139). As mentioned above, most antimicrobial peptides are small, positively charged, and amphipathic molecules that allow them to actively interact with bacterial membranes through different models (barrel-stave model, carpet model, or toroidal-pore model) (140, 141). As a consequence, antimicrobial peptides could disturb the structure of cell membrane, penetrate into cells, regulate intracellular pathways, and/or cause cell death. Other mechanisms may be also involved in the antibacterial properties of antimicrobial peptides, such as inhibiting cell wall synthesis, suppressing protein and nucleic acid synthesis, and inhibiting enzymatic activities in bacteria (142).
The protective effects of antimicrobial peptides on intestinal health have been reported in weaned pigs. Supplementation of recombinant lactoferrin increased gut morphology (e.g., greater villi height) and growth performance of piglets (143). Xiao et al. (144) reported that feeding 0.4% of a mixture of antimicrobial peptides (including bovine lactoferrin and plant defensins) and active yeast alleviated the negative effects of mycotoxin by increasing intestinal integrity and reducing intestinal permeability of weaned pigs. Several defensins were shown to enhance mucosa barrier function by up-regulating the expression of mucin and tight junction proteins (145). The potential benefits of antimicrobial peptides are also related to other modes of action, such as regulating immune responses and gut microbiota (146). Supplementation of recombinant lactoferrin or lactoferramoin-lactoferricin increased Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium counts but reduced total E. coli and Salmonella in the small intestine of weaned pigs (146, 147). Addition of cecropin A/D reduced incidence of diarrhea and enhanced intestinal Lactobacilli counts in E. coli challenged piglets (148). As reviewed in Zasloff (136), fully processed active peptides probably act as epithelial “preservatives” to protect host against intestinal infectious agents. They may also work as effector molecules of innate and adaptive immunity by regulating inflammatory responses and chemotactic activity in pigs (149, 150).
There are two ways to incorporate the benefits of antimicrobial peptides into animal health and nutrition. One is direct supplementation of exogenous antimicrobial peptides to animal feed, while the other one is to use dietary supplements/ingredients to stimulate the secretion of endogenous antimicrobial peptides by the host (135). Although exogenous or recombinant antimicrobial peptides have shown a great potential to be used as alternatives to replace antibiotics, the effectiveness of those candidates should be carefully verified because the majority of exogenous antimicrobial peptides would be digested in the upper gastrointestinal tract without reaching to the lower part where most pathogens reside. Therefore, the stimulation of endogenous antimicrobial peptides secretion by nutritional manipulation may be a better approach. For instance, Robinson et al. (135) have completely reviewed the regulation of antimicrobial peptides synthesis by butyrate and vitamin D in livestock and poultry and pointed out the importance of antimicrobial peptides-inducing compounds in antibiotic-free animal production.
Short-Chain Fatty Acids
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are fatty acids with a chain of <6 carbon atoms, which are primarily produced by hindgut fermentation of dietary fiber. The SCFAs are a major fuel source for colonocytes, and are essential for maintaining the normal metabolism of colon mucosa, including colonocyte growth and proliferation (151, 152). In particular, as much as 90% of butyric acid is metabolized by colonocytes (153). However, the benefits of SCFAs is probably not limited to the colon: (1) SCFAs may function as a direct energy source for enterocytes, thus, increase proliferation and reduce apoptosis of enterocytes (154, 155), (2) SCFAs may modulate the expression of genes involved in gut motility, host defense, and inflammatory responses (154, 156), (3) SCFA could stimulate the formation of intestinal barrier and protect intestinal barrier disruption (157), and (4) SCFA may affect the composition of gut microbiota (158–160). The most abundant SCFAs in the gastrointestinal tract are acetate, propionate, and butyric acid. Despite being the least abundant of the 3 primary SCFAs, butyric acid has attracted significant research attention due to its' importance of maintaining gut health in both human and animals.
Butyric acid, also known as butanoic acid, is one of the SCFAs that are produced by microbial fermentation in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs (161). Especially, the propionic and butyric acids produced in the gastrointestinal tract are considered important metabolites that have antibacterial effects on pathogenic bacteria (162). In particular, butyrate has received particular attention and has been widely investigated as an attractive potential alternative to replace in-feed antibiotics. Addition of butyric acid directly to a swine diet may be limited because of its highly volatile and corrosive characteristics (163). Therefore, some products of butyric acid have been used in combined forms with calcium or sodium.
It has been reported that dietary supplementation of 0.1% sodium butyrate reduced diarrhea, enhanced gut integrity, increased serum IgG, but decreased serum pro-inflammatory cytokines in weaned pigs under normal conditions (158, 159, 164, 165). Machinsky et al. (166) also observed a positive effect of sodium butyrate on the protein digestibility of pigs. Another alternative form of butyrate is glyceryl tributyrate, also called tributyrin. Tributyrin is a naturally present triglyceride in butter at the minute amounts. The major advantage of tributyrin vs. sodium butyrate is that tributyrin is a delayed release source of butyrate. Tributyrin stays intact in the stomach and is slowly released as butyrate and/or monobutyrin in the small intestine where pancreatic lipase appears. Feeding 0.1% tributyrin reduced intestinal injury caused by intrarectal administration of acetic acid, as indicated by improved tight-junction formation and activated epidermal growth factor receptor signaling (167). Supplementation of tributyrin also improved the growth and intestinal barrier functions in intrauterine growth-restricted piglets (168).
Despite many years of research, the exact mechanism of action of dietary butyrate supplements has not been fully elucidated, but the following mechanisms have been proposed (Figure 2). Butyric acid penetrates into epithelial cells either by simple diffusion or monocarboxylate transoporter (169). Butyric acid could also bind to G-protein-coupled receptor expressed in epithelial cells or immune cells. The binding will mediate a cascade of immune regulation (170). A brief summary for the anti-microbial and/or immuno-regualtory effects of butyric acid is shown below. First, butyric acid regulates a large amount of gene expression as one of histone deacetylase inhibitors by removing acetyl groups from the N-terminal tail of the histones (171, 172). Recent studies also revealed that the inhibition of histone deacetylase is highly correlated to the regulation of inflammatory responses and immunity by butyric acid in both human and rodents (157, 173, 174). Second, butyric acid and its derivatives have been shown to possess strong antimicrobial activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogenic bacteria both in vivo and in vitro (175, 176). The antimicrobial activity of butyric acid is likely due to the ability of this acid to penetrate the bacterial cell wall and acidify the cell cytoplasm, thereby causing bacterial death (177). Third, butyric acid could enhance the expression of host defense peptides in different types of porcine cells, which is remarkably important in modulating host immune system and against a range of pathogens including antibiotic-resistant strains (178, 179). Last but not least, butyric acid may be able to alleviate intestinal injury by promoting tight-junction formation (167, 180).
Figure 2. Proposed mechanisms of action on the beneficial effects of butyric acid.
Conclusions
A healthy gut is extremely important, as the gut is a nutrient digestion and absorption organ, a chemo-/nutritional sensing organ, as well as the largest immune organ in the body. The young pigs in post-weaning period have limited luminal nutrition supply and are immediately imposed to tremendous challenges, which cause changes in the structure and function of the intestinal tract. These changes may include but not limited to disrupted intestinal structure, reduced digestive and absorptive capacity, damaged intestinal barrier, loss of microbial diversity, and unbalanced intestinal immune homeostasis. A large amount of research have been conducted to increase our understanding of the importance of gut health on animal production and performance, although the definition of a healthy gut is still not unified. Currently, the most summarized and generalized one is that a healthy gut may contain several key criteria, such as, effective nutrient digestion and absorption, effective waste excretion, a functional and protective gut barrier, a stable and appropriate microbial community, a functional and protective gut immunity, a minimal activation of stress/neural pathways, and the absence of diseases. To promote gut health of weaned pigs, particularly under the restriction of the use of antibiotics in feed, a wide arrange of nutritional interventions have been proposed and investigated. Increasing evidences show that supplementation of extra functional amino acids or specific phytochemicals could provide very positive impacts on intestinal integrity and immunity of weaned pigs. Antimicrobial peptides and their inducing compounds such as butyrate derivatives have also emerged as a potentially viable alternative to replace antibiotics and to maintain intestinal health. There are much more candidates of feed additives/nutritional interventions than the four listed in this review, which may be effective in regulating intestinal environments and enhancing weaned pig performance. It is very important to keep in mind that the efficiencies of each candidate may differ on the basis of their modes of action, the basal diet formulation, and the health status of pigs. Moreover, the importance of omics approaches (i.e., metagenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc.) should be highly recognized as well, although it is not discussed in the current review. These novel approaches have been widely adopted to explore the mechanisms of nutritional interventions on animal health and production by investigating the impacts of nutrition on intestinal microbiota and their metabolites, and the interactions of nutrition, genes and their encoded products (proteins and peptides, etc.).
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Robinson TP, et al. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2015) 112:5649–54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503141112
2. Food and Drug Administration. Summary Report on Antimicrobials Sold or Distributed for us in Food-Producing Animals. (2015). Available online at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/forindustry/userfees/animaldruguserfeeactadufa/ucm534243.pdf (Accessed June 5:2018).
3. FDA GFI (2013). Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/UCM299624.pdf
4. Lallès JP, Boudry G, Favier C, Le Floc'h N, Luron I, Montagne L, et al. Gut function and dysfunction in young pigs: physiology. Anim Res (2004). 53:301–16. doi: 10.1051/animres:2004018
5. Spreeuwenberg MAM, Verdonk JMAJ, Gaskins HR, Verstegen MWA. Small intestine epithelial barrier function is compromised in pigs with low feed intake at weaning. J Nutr. (2001) 131:1520–7. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.5.1520
6. Stokes CR, Bailey M, Haverson K, Harris C, Jones P, Inman C, et al. Postnatal development of intestinal immune system in piglets: implications for the process of weaning. Anim Res. (2004) 53:325–34. doi: 10.1051/animres:2004020
7. Barszca M, Skomiał J. The development of the small intestine of piglets – chosen aspects. J Anim Feed Sci. (2011) 20:3–15. doi: 10.22358/jafs/66152/2011
8. Moeser AJ, Pohl CS, Rajput M. Weaning stress and gastrointestinal barrier development: Implications for lifelong gut health in pigs. Anim Nutr. (2017) 3:313–21. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.06.003
9. Guevarra RB, Hong SH, Cho JH, Kim B, Shin J, Lee JH, et al. The dynamics of the piglet gut microbiome during the weaning transition in association with health and nutrition. J Anim Sci Biotech. (2018) 9:54–62. doi: 10.1186/s40104-018-0269-6
10. van der Flier LG, Clevers H. Stem cells, self-renewal, and differentiation in the intestinal epithelium. Annu Rev Physiol. (2009) 71:241–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.010908.163145
11. Qi Z, Chen YG. Regulation of intestinal stem cell fate specification. Sci China Life Sci. (2015) 58:570–8. doi: 10.1007/s11427-015-4859-7
12. Zhou J, Xiong X, Wang K, Zou L, Lv D, Yin Y. Ethanolamine metabolism in the mammalian gastrointestinal tract: mechanisms, patterns, and importance. Curr Mol Med. (2017) 17:1–8. doi: 10.2174/1566524017666170331161715
13. Cheng H, Leblond CP. Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. V Unitarian Theory of the origin of the four epithelial cell types. Am J Anat. (1974) 14:537–61. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001410407
14. Baker N. Adult intestinal stem cells: critical drivers of epithelial homeostasis and regeneration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2014) 15:19–33. doi: 10.1038/nrm3721
15. Xiong X, Yang H, Tan B, Yang C, Wu M, Liu G, et al. Differential expression of proteins involved in energy production along the crypt-villus axis in early-weaning pig small intestine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. (2015) 309:G229–37. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00095.2015
16. Xiong X, Yang H, Hu X, Wang X, Li B, Long L, et al. Differential proteome analysis along jejunal crypt-villus axis in piglets. Front Biosci. (2016) 21:343–63. doi: 10.2741/4392
17. Yang H, Wang X, Xiong X, Yin Y. Energy metabolism in intestinal epithelial cells during maturation along the crypt-villus axis. Sci Rep. (2016) 25:31917. doi: 10.1038/srep31917
18. Yang H, Xiong X, Wang X, Tan B, Li T, Yin Y. Effects of weaning on intestinal upper villus epithelial cells of piglets. PLoS ONE (2016) 11:e0150216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150216
19. Yang H, Xiong X, Wang X, Yin Y. Mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway changes with intestinal epithelial cells renewal along crypt-villus axis. Cell Physiol Biochem. (2016) 39:751–9. doi: 10.1159/000445665
20. Wu F, Xiong X, Yang H, Yao K, Duan Y, Wang X, et al. Expression of proteins in intestinal middle villus epithelial cells of weaning piglets. Front Biosci. (2017) 22:539–57. doi: 10.2741/4501
21. Wang J, Tan B, Li G, Xiao H, Huang B, Zhang M, et al. Polyamine metabolism in the intestine of piglets is altered by weaning and proline supplementation. J Anim Sci. (2016) 94:423–8. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9464
22. Pluske JR, Hampson DJ, Williams IH. Factors influencing the structure and function of the small intestine in the weaned pig: a review. Livest Sci. (1997) 51:215–36. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00057-2
23. Brown DC, Maxwell CV, Erf GF, Davis ME, Singh S, Johnson ZB. The influence of different management systems and age on intestinal morphology, immune cell numbers and mucin production from goblet cells in post-weaning pigs. Vet Immunol Immunop. (2006) 111:187–98. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.12.006
24. Gu X, Li D, She R. Effect of weaning on small intestinal structure and function in the piglet. Arch Tierernaehr. (2002) 56:275–86. doi: 10.1080/00039420214345
25. Pacha J. Development of intestinal transport function in mammals. Physiol Rev. (2000) 80:1633–67. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1633
26. Chang EB, Leung PS. Intestinal water and electrolyte transport. In: P. S. Leung, editor. The Gastrointestinal System: Gastrointestinal, Nutritional and Hepatobiliary Physiology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. (2014). p. 107–134. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8771-0_5
27. Boudry GL, Péron V, Le Huërou-Luron I, Lallès JP, Sève B. Weaning induces both transient and long-lasting modifications of absorptive, secretory, and barrier properties of piglet intestine. J Nutr. (2004) 134:2256–62. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.9.2256
28. Hedemann MS, Jensen BB. Variations in enzyme activity in stomach and pancreatic tissue and digesta in piglets around weaning. Arch Anim Nutr. (2004) 58:47–59. doi: 10.1080/00039420310001656677
29. Nabuurs MJA, Hoogendoorn A, Van Zijderveld FG. Effects of weaning and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli on net absorption in the small intestine of pigs. Res Vet Sci. (1994) 56:379–85. doi: 10.1016/0034-5288(94)90156-2
30. Campbell JM, Crenshaw JD, Polo J. The biological stress of early weaned piglets. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. (2013) 4:19–22. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-4-19
31. Moeser AJ, Blikslager AT. Mechanisms of porcine diarrheal disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2007) 231:56–67. doi: 10.2460/javma.231.1.56
32. Peace RM, Campbell J, Polo J, Crenshaw J, Russell L, Moeser A. Spray-dried porcine plasma influences intestinal barrier function, inflammation, and diarrhea in weaned pigs. J Nutr. (2011) 141:1312–7. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.136796
33. Hu CH, Xiao K, Luan ZS, Song J. Early weaning increases intestinal permeability, alters expression of cytokine and tight junction proteins, and activates mitogen-activated protein kinases in pigs1. J Anim Sci. (2013) 91:1094–101. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5796
34. McLamb BL, Gibson AJ, Overman EL, Stahl C, Moeser AJ. Early weaning stress in pigs impairs innate mucosal immune responses to enterotoxigenic E. coli challenge and exacerbates intestinal injury and clinical disease. PLoS ONE (2013) 8:e59838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059838
35. Wang J, Zeng L, Tan B, Li G, Huang B, Xiong X, et al. Developmental changes in intercellular junctions and Kv channels in the intestine of piglets during the suckling and post-weaning periods. J Anim Sci Biotech. (2016) 7:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s40104-016-0063-2
36. Isaacson R, Kim HB. The intestinal microbiome of the pig. Anim Health Res Rev. (2012) 13:100–9. doi: 10.1017/S1466252312000084
37. Gresse R, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Fleury MA, Van de Wiele T, Forano E, Blanquet-Diot S. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in postweaning piglets: understanding the keys to health. Trends Microbiol. (2017) 25:851–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.004
38. Frese SA, Parker K, Calvert CC, Mills DA. Diet shapes the gut microbiome of pigs during nursing and weaning. Microbiome (2015) 3:28–37. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0091-8
39. Konstantinov SR, Awati AA, Williams BA, Miller BG, Jones P, Stokes CR, et al. Post-natal development of the porcine microbiota composition and activities. Environ Microbiol. (2006) 8:1191–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01009.x
40. Petri D, Hill J, Van Kessel A. Microbial succession in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of the preweaned pig. Livest Sci. (2010) 133:107–9. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.037
41. Tao X, Xu Z, Wan J. Intestinal microbiota diversity and expression of pattern recognition receptors in newly weaned piglets. Anaerobe (2015) 32:51–6. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.12.005
42. Rist VT, Weiss E, Eklund M, Mosenthin R. Impact of dietary protein on microbiota composition and activity in the gastrointestinal tract of piglets in relation to gut health: a review. Animal (2013) 7:1067–78. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113000062
43. Carmody RN, Turnbaugh PJ. Host-microbial interactions in the metabolism of therapeutic and diet-derived xenobiotics. J Clin Invest. (2014) 124:4173–81. doi: 10.1172/JCI72335
44. Ren W, Chen S, Yin J, Duan J, Li T, Liu G, et al. Dietary arginine supplementation of mice alters the microbial population and activates intestinal innate immunity. J Nutr. (2014) 144:988–95. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.192120
45. Zou L, Wang X, Jiang L, Wang S, Xiong X, Yang H, et al. Molecular cloning, characterization and expression analysis of Frizzled 6 in the small intestine of pigs (Sus scrofa). PLoS ONE (2017) 12:e0179421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179421
46. Bäumler AJ, Sperandio V. Interactions between the microbiota and pathogenic bacteria in the gut. Nature (2016) 535:85–93. doi: 10.1038/nature18849
47. Delzenne NM, Cani PD. Interaction between obesity and the gut microbiota: relevance in nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr. (2011) 31:15–31. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-072610-145146
48. Thiennimitr P, Winter SE, Winter MG, Xavier MN, Tolstikov V, Huseby DL, et al. Intestinal inflammation allows Salmonella to use ethanolamine to compete with the microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2011) 108:17480–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107857108
49. Anderson CJ, Clark DE, Adli M, Kendall MM. Ethanolamine signaling promotes salmonella niche recognition and adaptation during infection. PLoS Pathog. (2015) 11:e1005278. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005278
50. Luzader DH, Clark DE, Gonyar LA, Kendall MM. EutR is a direct regulator of genes that contribute to metabolism and virulence in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Bacteriol. (2013) 195:4947–53. doi: 10.1128/JB.00937-13
51. Pacheco AR, Curtis MM, Ritchie JM, Munera D, Waldor MK, Moreira CG, et al. Fucose sensing regulates bacterial intestinal colonization. Nature (2012) 492:113–7. doi: 10.1038/nature11623
52. Winter SE, Winter MG, Xavier MN, Thiennimitr P, Poon V, Keestra AM, et al. Host-derived nitrate boosts growth of E. coli in the inflamed gut. Science (2013) 339:708–11. doi: 10.1126/science.1232467
53. Brandtzaeg P. The increasing power of immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry. J Immunol Methods. (1998) 216:49–67. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(98)00070-2
54. Rimoldi M, Chieppa M, Salucci V, Avogadri F, Sonzogni A, Sampietro GM, et al. Intestinal immune homeostasis is regulated by the crosstalk between epithelial cells and dendritic cells. Nat Immunol. (2005) 6:507–14. doi: 10.1038/ni1192
55. Upham JW, Rate A, Rowe J, Kusel M, Sly PD, Holt PG. Dendritic cell immaturity during infancy restricts the capacity to express vaccaine-specific T-cell memory. Infect Immun. (2006) 74:1106–12. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.2.1106-1112.2006
56. Nguyen M, Leuridan E, Zhang T, De Wit D, Willems F, Van Damme P, et al. Acquisition of adult-like TLR4 and TLR9 responses duing the first year of life. PLoS ONE (2010) 5:e10407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010407
57. Beverley PC. Vaccine immunity. Immunol Today (1997) 18:413–5. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5699(97)01120-1
58. Blikslager AT, Roberts MC, Rhoads JM, Argenzio RA. Is reperfusion injury an important cause of mucosal damage after porcine intestinal ischemia? Surgery (1997) 121:526–34. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90107-0
59. McCracken BA, Spurlock ME, Roos MA, Zuckermann FA, Gaskins HR. Weaning anorexia may contribute to local inflammation in the piglet small intestine. J Nutr. (1999) 129:613–9. doi: 10.1093/jn/129.3.613
60. Pié S, Lalles JP, Blazy F, Laffitte J, Seve B, Oswald IP. Weaning is associated with an upregulation of expression of inflammatory cytokines in the intestine of piglets. J Nutr. (2004) 134:641–7. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.3.641
61. Ponta H, Cato AC, Herrlich P. Interference of pathway specific transcription factors. Biochim Biophys Acta. (1992) 1129:255–61. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(92)90501-P
62. Ushida K, Kaneue C, Tsukahara T, Fukuta K, Nakanishi N. Decreasing traits of fecal immunoglobulin A in neonatal and weaning piglets. J Vet Med Sci. (2008) 70:849–52. doi: 10.1292/jvms.70.849
63. Zhu LH, Zhao KL, Chen XL, Xu JX. Impact of weaning and an antioxidant blend on intestinal barrier function and antioxidant statis in pigs. J Anim Sci. (2012) 90:2581–9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4444
64. Rao R. Oxidative stress-induced disruption of epithelial and endothelial tight junctions. Front Biosci. (2008) 13:7210–26. doi: 10.2741/3223
65. Vergauwen H, Tambuyzer B, Jennes K, Degroote J, Wang W, De Smet S, et al. Indirect oxidative stress in the IPEC-J2 cells, an in vitro model for the porcine gastrointestinal tract. PLoS ONE (2015) 10:e0120485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120485
66. Finkel T. Oxidant signals and oxidative stress. Curr Opin Cell Biol. (2003) 15:247–54. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00002-4
67. Minelli A, Bellezza I, Conte C, Culig Z. Oxidative stress-related aging: a role for prostate cancer? Biochin Biophys Acta. (2009) 1795:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2008.11.001
68. Yin J, Ren W, Liu G, Duan J, Yang G, Wu L, et al. Birth oxidative stress and the development of an antixodant system in newborn piglets. Free Radic Res. (2013) 47:1027–35. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2013.848277
69. Yin J, Wu MM, Xiao H, Ren WK, Duan JL, Yang G, et al. Development of an antioxidant system after early weaning in piglets. J Anim Sci. (2014) 92:612–9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6986
70. Kil IS, Kim SY, Park JW. Glutathionylation regulates IκB. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2008) 373:169–73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.06.007
71. Kogut MH, Arsenault RJ. Editorial: gut health: the new paradigm in food animal production. Front Vet Sci. (2016) 3:71–4. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00071
72. Celi P, Cowieson AJ, Fru-Nij F, Steinert RE, Kluenter A-M, Verlhac V. Gastrointestinal functionality in animal nutrtion and health: new opportunities for sustainable animal production. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2017) 234:88–100. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.09.012
73. Jayaraman B, Nyachoti CM. Husbandry practices and gut health outcomes in weaned pigs: a review. Anim Nutr. (2017) 3:205–11. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.06.002
74. Pluske JR, Turpin DL, Kim J. Gastrointestinal tract (gut) health in the young pig. Anim Nutr. (2018) 4:187–96. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.12.004
75. Pettigrew JE. Reduced use of antibiotic growth promoters in diets fed to weanling pigs: dietary tools, part 1. Anim Biotechnol. (2006) 17:207–15. doi: 10.1080/10495390600956946
76. Lallès J, Bosi P, Smidt H, Stokes CR. Nutritional management of gut health in pigs around weaning. Proc Nutr Soc. (2007) 66:260–8. doi: 10.1017/S0029665107005484
77. Kil D, Stein H. Board invited review: management and feeding strategies to ameliorate the impact of removing antibiotic growth promoters from diets fed to weanling pigs. Can J Anim Sci. (2010) 90:447–60. doi: 10.4141/cjas10028
78. Liu Y, Espinosa CD, Abelilla JJ, Casas GA, Lagos LV, Lee SA, et al. Non-antibiotic feed additives in diets for pigs: a review. Anim Nutr. (2018) 4:113–25. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.01.007
79. Yao K, Yin YL, Chu W, Liu Z, Deng D, Li T, et al. Dietary arginine supplementation increases mTOR signaling activity in skeletal muscle of neonatal pigs. J Nutr. (2008) 138:867–72. doi: 10.1093/jn/138.5.867
80. Brasse-Lagnel C, Lavoinne A, Husson A. Control of mammalian gene expression by amino acids, especially glutamine. FEBS J. (2009) 276:1826–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06920.x
81. Wu X, Ruan Z, Gao Y, Yin Y, Zhou X, Wang L, et al. Dietary supplementation with L-arginine or N-carbamylglutamate enhances intestinal growth and heat shock protein-70 expression in weanling pigs fed a corn- and soybean meal-based diet. Amino Acids. (2010) 39:831–9. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0538-y
82. Wu G, Bazer FW, Davis TA, Kim SW, Li P, Rhoads JM, et al. Arginine metabolism and nutrition in growth, health and disease. Amino Acids. (2009) 37:153–68. doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0210-y
83. Wu G, Bazer FW, Davis TA, Jaeger LA, Johnson GA, Kim SW, et al. Important roles for the arginine family of amino acids in swine nutrition and production. Livest Sci. (2007) 112:8–22. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.07.003
84. Wu G. Amino acids: metabolism, functions, and nutrition. Amino Acids. (2009) 37:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00726-009-0269-0
85. Wu G. Functional amino acids in growth, reproduction, and health. Adv Nutr. (2013) 1:31–7. doi: 10.3945/an.110.1008
86. Davis TA, Nguyen HV, Garciaa-Bravo R, Fiorotto ML, Jackson EM, Lewis DS, et al. Amino acid composition of human milk is not unique. J Nutr. (1994) 124:1126–32. doi: 10.1093/jn/124.7.1126
87. Wu G, Knabe DA. Free and protein-bound amino acids in sow's colostrums and milk. J Nutr. (1994) 124:415–24.
88. Wu G, Ott TL, Knabe DA, Bazer FW. Aminoa acid composition of the fetal pig. J Nutr. (1999) 129:1031–8. doi: 10.1093/jn/129.5.1031
89. Kim SW, McPheron RL, Wu G. Dietary arginine supplementation enhances the growth of milk-fed young pigs. J Nutr. (2004) 134:625–30. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.3.625
90. Hernandez A, Hansen CF, Mullan BP, Pluske JR. L-arginine supplementation of milk liquid or dry diets fed to pigs after weaning has a positive effect on production in the first three weeks after weaning at 21 day of age. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2009) 154:102–11. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.08.007
91. Wu L, Liao P, He L, Feng Z, Ren W, Yin J, et al. Deitary L-arginine supplementation protects weanling pigs from deoxynivalenol-induced toxicity. Toxins (2015) 7:1341–54. doi: 10.3390/toxins7041341
92. Yang XF, Jiang ZY, Gong YL, Zheng CT, Hu YJ, Wang L, et al. Supplementation of pre-weaning diet with L-arginine has carry-over effect to improve intestinal development in young piglets. Can J Anim Sci. (2015) 96:52–9. doi: 10.1139/cjas-2015-0043
93. Eklou-Lawson M, Bernard F, Neveux N, Charmontet C, Bos C, Davila-Gay AM, et al. Colonic luminal ammonia and potal blood L-glutamine and L-arginine concentrations: a possible link between colon mucosa and liver ureagenesis. Amino Acids (2009) 37:751–60. doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0218-3
94. Tan B, Xiao H, Xiong X, Wang J, Li G, Yin Y, et al. L-argine improves DNA synthesis in LPS-challenged enterocytes. Front Biosci. (2015) 20:989–1003. doi: 10.2741/4352
95. Tan B, Yin Y, Kong X, Li P, Li X, Gao H, et al. L-argine stimulates proliferation and prevents endotoxin-induced death of intestinal cells. Amino Acids (2010) 38:1227–35. doi: 10.1007/s00726-009-0334-8
96. Alican I, Kubes P. A critical role for nutric oxide in intestinal barrier function and dysfunction. Am J Physiol. (1996) 270:G225–37.
97. Wang J, Li G, Tan B, Xiong X, Kong X, Xiao D, et al. Oral administration of putrescine and proline during the suckling period improve epithelial restitution after early weaning in piglets. J Anim Sci. (2015) 93:1679–88. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8230
98. Wu G, Meier SA, Knabe DA. Dietary glutamine supplementation prevents jejunal atrophy in weaned pigs. J Nutr. (1996) 126:2578–84. doi: 10.1093/jn/126.10.2578
99. Li Y, Li J, Jiang J, Li N, Wang X, Wang Z, et al. Glycyl-glutamine-supplemnted long-term total parenteral nutrition selectively improves structure and function in heterotopic small-bowel autotransplantation in the pig. Transpl Int. (2003) 16:866–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2003.tb00256.x
100. Jiang ZY, Sun LH, Lin YC, Ma XY, Zheng CT, Zhou GL, et al. Effects of dietary glycyl-glutamine on growth performance, small intestinal integrity, and immune responses of weaning piglets challenged with lipopolysaccharide. J Anim Sci. (2009) 87:4050–6. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1120
101. Wang H, Jia G, Chen ZL, Huang L, Wu C, Wang K. The effect of glycyl-glutamine dipeptide concentration on enzyme activity, cell proliferation and apoptosis of jejunal tissues from weaned piglets. Agr Sci China. (2011) 10:1088–95. doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(11)60098-9
102. Tan B, Liu H, He G, Xiao H, Xiao D, Liu Y, et al. Alanyl-glutamine but not alycyl-glutamine improved the proliferation of enterocytes as glutamine sunstitution in vitro. Amino Acids (2017) 49:2023–31. doi: 10.1007/s00726-017-2460-z
103. Burrin DG, Reeds PJ. Alternative fuels in the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. (1997) 13:165–70. doi: 10.1097/00001574-199703000-00015
104. Luk GD, Marton LJ, Baylin SB. Ornithine decaboxylase is important in intestinal mucosa maturation and recovery from injury in rats. Science (1980) 210:195–8. doi: 10.1126/science.6774420
105. Wu G, Fang YZ, Yang S, Lupton JR, Turner ND. Glutathione metbaolism and its implications for health. J Nutr. (2004) 134:489–92. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.3.489
106. Wang J, Chen L, Li P, Zhou H, Wang F, Li D, et al. Gene expression is altered in piglet small intestine by weaning and dietary glutamine supplementation. J Nutr. (2008) 138:1025–32. doi: 10.1093/jn/138.6.1025
107. Wu M, Xiao H, Liu G, Chen S, Tan B, Ren W, et al. Glutamine promotes intestinal SIgA secretion through intestinal microbiota and IL-13. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2016) 60:1637–48. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201600026
108. Xiao H, Wu M, Shao F, Guan G, Huang B, Tan B, et al. N-acetyl-L-cysteine protects the enterocyte against oxidative damage by modulation of mitochondrial function. Mediators Inflamm. (2016) 2016:8364279. doi: 10.1155/2016/8364279
109. Liang H, Dai Z, Liu N, Ji Y, Chen J, Zhang Y, et al. Dietary L-trypophan modulates the structural and functional composition of the intestinal microbiome in weaned piglets. Front Microb. (2018) 9:1736–47. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01736
110. Zong E, Huang P, Zhang W, Li J, Li Y, Ding X, et al. The effects of dietary sulfur amino acids on growth performance, intestinal morphology, enzyme activity, and nutrient transporters in weaning piglets. J Anim Sci. (2018) 96:1130–9. doi: 10.1093/jas/skx003
111. Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts. J Appl Microbiol. (1999) 86:985–90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00780.x
112. Wong SY, Grant IR, Friedman M, Elliott CT, Situ C. Antibacterial activities of naturally occurring compounds against Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis. Appl Env Microbiol. (2008) 74:5986–90. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00981-08
113. Garozzo A, Timpanaro R, Bisignano B, Furneri PM, Bisignano G, Castro A. In vitro antiviral activity of Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil. Lett Appl Microbiol. (2009) 49:806–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02740.x
114. Liu Y, Che TM, Song M, Lee JJ, Almeida JA, Bravo D, et al. Dietary plant extracts improve immune responses and growth efficiency of pigs experimentally infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. J Anim Sci. (2013) 91:5668–79. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6495
115. Sökmen M, Serkedjieva J, Daferera D, Gulluce M, Polissiou M, Tepe B, et al. In vitro antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antiviral activities of the essential oil and various extracts from herbal parts and callus cultures of Origanum acutidens. J Agric Food Chem. (2004) 52:3309–12. doi: 10.1021/jf049859g
116. Dundar E, Olgun EG, Isiksoy S, Kurkcuoglu M, Baser KH, Bal C. The effects of intra-rectal and intra-peritoneal application of Origanum onites L. essential oil on 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid-induced colitis in the rat. Exp Toxical Pathol. (2008) 59:399–408. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2007.11.009
117. Liu Y, Song M, Che TM, Bravo D, Pettigrew JE. Anti-inflammatory effects of several plant extracts on porcine alveolar macrophages in vitro. J Anim Sci. (2012) 90:2774–83. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4304
118. Liu Y, Song M, Che TM, Lee JJ, Bravo D, Maddox CW, et al. Dietary plant extracts modulate gene expression profiles in ileal mucosa of weaned pigs after an Escherichia coli infection. J Anim Sci. (2014) 92:2050–62. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6422
119. Oboh G, Puntel RL, Rocha JBT. Hot pepper (Capsicum annuum, Tepin and Capsicum chinese, Habanero) prevent Fe2+ -induced lipid peroxidation in brain – in vitro. Food Chem. (2007) 102:178–85. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.05.048
120. Liu Y. Effects of Plant Extracts on Immune Function and Disease Resistance in Pigs. Dissertation. Urbana: University of Illinois (2011).
121. Lillehoj H, Liu Y, Calsamiglia S, Fernandez-Miyakawa ME, Chi F, Cravens RL, et al. Phytochemicals as potential antibiotic alternatives to promote growth and enhance host health: a report from the second international symposium on alternatives to antibiotics. Vet Res. (2018) 46:76–93. doi: 10.1186/s13567-018-0562-6
122. Liu Y, Song M, Che TM, Almeida JA, Lee JJ, Bravo D, et al. Dietary plant extracts alleviate diarrhea and alter immune responses of weaned pigs experimentally infected with a pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Anim Sci. (2013) 91:5294–306. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-6194
123. Zou Y, Xiang Q, Wang J, Peng J, Wei H. Oregano essential oil improves intestinal morphology and expression of tight junction proteins associated with modulation of selected intestinal bacteria and immune status in a pig model. BioMed Res Int. (2016) 2016:5436738. doi: 10.1155/2016/5436738
124. Wang W, Zhu R, Xie Q, Li A, Xiao Y, Li K, et al. Enhanced bioavailability and efficiency of curcumin for the treatment of asthma by its formulation in solid lipid nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine (2012) 7:3667–77. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S30428
125. Yuan D, Hussain T, Tan B, Liu Y, Ji P, Yin Y. The evaluation of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of Eucommia ulmoides flavones using diquat-challenged piglet models. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2017) 2017:8140962. doi: 10.1155/2017/8140962
126. Lang A, Lahav M, Sakhnini E, Barshack I, Fidder HH, Avidan B, et al. Allicin inhibits spontaneous and TNF-alpha induced secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines from intestinal epithelial cells. Clin Nutr. (2004) 23:1199–208. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.03.011
127. Slamenova D, Horvathova E, Marsalkova L, Wsolova L. Carvacrol given to rats in drinking water reduces the level of DNA lesions induced in freshly isolated hepatocytes and testicular cells by H(2)O(2). Neoplasma (2008) 55:394–9.
128. Frankič T, Levart A, Salobir J. The effect of vitamin E and plant extract misture composed of carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde and capsaicin on oxidative stress induced by high PUFA load in young pigs. Animal (2010) 4:572–8. doi: 10.1017/S1751731109991339
129. Amorati R, Foti MC, Valgimigli L. Antioxidant activity of essential oils. J Agri Food Chem. (2013) 61:10835–47. doi: 10.1021/jf403496k
130. Wu Z, Tan B, Liu Y, Dunn J, Ji P. In vitro analysis of antioxidant properties of mint oils. J Anim Sci. (2018) 96:144–5.
131. Djeridane A, Yousfi M, Nadjemi B, Boutassouna D, Stocker P, Vidal N. Antioxidant activity of some algerian medicinal plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. Food Chem. (2006) 97:654–60. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.04.028
132. Lobo V, Patil A, Phatak A, Chandra N. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: impact on human health. Pharmacogn Rev. (2010) 4:118–26. doi: 10.4103/0973-7847.70902
133. Xiao H, Shao F, Wu M, Ren W, Xiong X, Tan B, et al. The application of antimicrobial peptides as growth and health promoters for swine. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. (2015) 6:19–24. doi: 10.1186/s40104-015-0018-z
134. Wang S, Zeng X, Yang Q, Qiao S. Antimicrobial peptides as potential alternatives to antibiotics in food animal industry. Int J Mol Sci. (2016) 17:603–14. doi: 10.3390/ijms17050603
135. Robinson K, M X, Liu Y, Qiao S, Hou Y, Zhang G. Dietary modulaton of endogenois host defense peptides synthesis as an alternative approach to in-feed antibiotics. Anim Nutr. (2018) 4:160–9. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.01.003
136. Zasloff M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature (2002) 415:389–95. doi: 10.1038/415389a
137. Selsted ME, Ouellette AJ. Mammalian defensins in the antimicrobial immune response. Nat Immunol. (2005) 6:551–7. doi: 10.1038/ni1206
138. Hancock RE. Cationic peptides: effectors in innate immunty and novel antimicrobials. Lancet Infect Dis. (2001) 1:156–64. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00092-5
139. Zhang L, Parente J, Harris SM, Woods DE, Hancock REW, Falla TJ. Antimicrobial peptide therapeutics for cystic fibrosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (2005) 49:2921–7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.7.2921-2927.2005
140. Shai Y. Mechanism of the binding, insertion and destabilization of phospholipid biolayer membranes by α-helical antimicrobial and cell non-selective membrane-lytic peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. (1999) 1462:55–70. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00200-X
141. Yang L, Harroun TA, Weiss TM, Ding L, Huang HW. Barrel-stave model or toroidal model? A case study on melittin pores. Biophys J. (2001) 81:1475–85. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75802-X
142. Brogden KA. Antimicrobial peptides: Pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat Rev Microbiol. (2005) 3:238–50. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1098
143. Wang Y, Shan T, Xu Z, Liu J, Feng J. Effect of lactoferrin on the growth performance, intestinal morphology, and expression of PR-39 and protegrin-1 genes in weaned piglets. J Anim Sci. (2006) 84:2636–41. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-544
144. Xiao H, Wu MM, Tan BE, Yin YL, Li TJ, Xiao DF, et al. Effects of composite antimicrobial peptides in weanling piglets challenged with deoxynivalenol: I. Growth performance, immune function, and antioxidation capacity. J Anim Sci. (2013) 91:4772–80. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6426
145. Robinson K, Deng Z, Hou Y, Zhang G. Regulation of the intestinal barrier function by host defense peptides. Front Vet Sci. (2015) 2:57–63. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00057
146. Wang YZ, Shan TZ, Xu ZR, Feng J, Wang ZQ. Effects of the lactoferrin (LF) on the growth performance, intestinal microflora and morphology of weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2007) 135:263–72. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.07.013
147. Tang Z, Yin Y, Zhang Y, Huang R, Sun Z, Li T, et al. Effects of dietary supplementation with an expressed fusion peptide bovine lactoferricin-lactoferrampin on performance, immune function and intestinal mucosal morphology in piglets weaned at age 21 d. Br J Nutr. (2009) 101:998–1005. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508055633
148. Wu S, Zhang F, Huang Z, Liu H, Xie C, Zhang J, et al. Effects of the antimicrobial peptide cecropin AD on performance and intestinal health in weaned piglets challenged with Escherichia coli. Peptides (2012) 35:225–30. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.03.030
149. Mansour SC, Pena OM, Hancock RE. Host defense peptides: front-line immunomodulators. Trends Immunol. (2014) 35:443–50. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.07.004
150. Ren ZH, Yuan W, Deng HD, Deng JL, Dan QX, Jin HT, et al. Effects of antbacterial peptide on cellular immunity in weaned piglets. J Anim Sci. (2015) 93:127–34. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7933
151. Rossi R, Pastorelli G, Cannata S, Corino C. Recent advances in the use of fatty acids as supplements in pig diets: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2010) 162:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.08.013
152. Bedford A, Gong J. Implications of butyrate and its derivatives for gut health and animal production. Anim Nutr. (2018) 4:151–9. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.08.010
153. Hamer HM, Jonkers DM, Venema K, Vanhoutvin SA, Troost FJ, Brummer BJ. Review article: the role of butyrate on colonic function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2008) 27:104–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03562.x
154. Bartholome AL, Albin DM, Baker DH, Holst JJ, Tappenden KA. Supplementation of total parenteral nutrition with butyrate acutely increases structural aspects of intestinal adaptation after an 80% jejunoileal resection in neonatal pigs. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. (2004) 28:210–22. doi: 10.1177/0148607104028004210
155. Kien CL, Blauwiekel R, Bunn JY, Jetton TL, Frankel WL, Holst JJ. Cecal infusion of butyrate increases intestinal cell proliferation in piglets. J Nutr. (2007) 137:916–22. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.4.916
156. Guilloteau P, Martin L, Eeckhaut V, Ducatelle R, Zabielski R, Van Immerseel F. From the gut to the peripheral tissues: the multiple effects of butyrate. Nutr Res Rev. (2010) 23:366–84. doi: 10.1017/S0954422410000247
157. Feng Y, Wang Y, Wang P, Huang Y, Wang F. Short-chain fatty acids manifest stimulative and protective effects on intestinal barrier function through the inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasom and autophagy. Cell Physiol Biochem. (2018) 49:190–205. doi: 10.1159/000492853
158. Wen Z, Lu J, Zou X. Effect of sodium butyrate on the intestinal morphology and DNA-binding activity of intestinal nuclear factor-κB in weanling pigs. J Anim Vet Adv. (2012) 11:814–21. doi: 10.3923/javaa.2012.814.821
159. Huang C, Song P, Fan P, Hou C, Thacker P, Ma X. Dietary sodium butyrate decreases postweaning diarrhea by modulating intestinal permeability and changing the bacterial communities in weaned piglets. J Nutr. (2015) 145:2774–80. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.217406
160. Xu J, Chen X, Yu S, Su Y, Zhu W. Effects of early intervention with sodium butyrate on gut microbiota and the expression of inflammatory cytokines in neonatal piglets. PLoS ONE. (2016) 11:e0162461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162461
161. Mallo JJ, Balfagón A, Gracia MI, Honrubia P, Puyalto M. Evaluation of different protections of butyric acid aiming for release in the last part of the gastrointestinal tract of piglets. J Anim Sci. (2012) 90:227–9. doi: 10.2527/jas.53959
162. Stecher B, Hardt WD. Mechanisms controlling pathogen colonization of the gut. Curr Opin Microbiol. (2011) 14:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.10.003
163. Piva A, Casadei G, Biagi G. An organic acid blend can modulate swine intestinal fermentation and reduce microbial proteolysis. Can J Anim Sci. (2002) 82:527–32. doi: 10.4141/A01-090
164. Lu JJ, Zou XT, Wang YM. Effects of sodium butyrate on the growth performance, intestinal microflora and morphology of weanling pigs. J Anim Feed Sci. (2008) 17:568–78. doi: 10.22358/jafs/66685/2008
165. Fang CL, Sun H, Wu J, Niu HH, Feng J. Effects of sodium butyrate on growth performance, haematological and immunological characteristics of weanling piglets. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. (2014) 98:680–5. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12122
166. Machinsky TG, Kessler M, Ribeiro AML, Moraes L, Mello da Silva IC, Mayorga Cortes ME. Nutrient digestibility and Ca and P balance in pigs receiving butyric acid, phytase and different calcium levels. Ciencia Rural. (2015) 40:2350–5. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782010001100016
167. Hou Y, Wang L, Yi D, Ding B, Chen X, Wang Q, et al. Dietary supplementation with tributyrin alleviates intestinal injury in piglets challenged with intrarectal administration of acetic acid. Br J Nutr. (2014) 111:1748–58. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514000038
168. Dong L, Zhong X, He J, Zhang L, Bai K, Xu W, Wang T, Huang X. Supplementation of tributyrin improves the growth and intestinal digestive and barrier functions in intrauterine growth-restricted piglets. Clin Nutr. (2016) 35:399–407. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.03.002
169. Cuff M, Dyer J, Jones M, Shirazi-Beechey S. The human colonic monocarboxylate transporter isoform 1: its potential importance to colonic tissue homeostasis. Gastroenterology (2005) 128:676–86. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.12.003
170. Thangaraju M, Cresci GA, Liu K, Ananth S, Gnanaprakasam JP, Browning DD, et al. GPR109A is a G-protein-coupled receptor for the bacterial fermentation product butyrate and functions as a tumor suppressor in colon. Cancer Res. (2009) 69:2826–32. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4466
171. Marks PA, Richon VM, Rifkind RA. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: inducers of differentiation or apoptosis of transformed cells. J Natl Cancer Int. (2000) 92:1210–6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.15.1210
172. Canani RB, Costanzo MD, Leone L, Bedogni G, Brambilla P, Cianfarani S, et al. Epigenetic mechanisms elicited by nutrition in early life. Nutr Res Rev. (2011) 24:198–205. doi: 10.1017/S0954422411000102
173. Fontenelle B, Gilbert KM. N-Butyrate anergized effector CD4+ T cells independent of regulatory T cell generation or activity. Scand J Immuno. (2012) 76:457–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2012.02740.x
174. Tan J, Mckenzie C, Potamitis M, Thorburn AN, Mackay CR, Macia L. The role of short-chain fatty acids in health and disease. Adv Immunol. (2014) 121:91–119. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800100-4.00003-9
175. Cox NA, McHan F, Bailey JS, Shotts EB. Effect of butyric or lactic acid on the in vivo colonization of Salmonella typhimurium. J Appl Poult Res. (1994) 3:315–8. doi: 10.1093/japr/3.4.315
176. Namkung H, Yu H, Gong J, Leeson S. Antimicrobial activity of butyrate glycerides toward Salmonella Typhimurium and Clostridium perfringens. Poult Sci. (2011) 90:2217–22. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01498
177. Salsali H, Parker WJ, Sattar SA. The effect of volatile fatty acids on the inactivation of Clostridium perfringens in anaerobic digestion. World J Microbial Biotechnol. (2008) 24:659–65. doi: 10.1007/s11274-007-9514-4
178. Zeng X, Sunkara LT, Jiang W, Bible M, Carter S, Ma X, et al. Induction of porcine host defense peptide gene expression by short-chain fatty acids and their analogs. PLoS ONE (2013) 8:e72922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072922
179. Xiong H, Guo B, Gan Z, Song D, Lu Z, Yi H, et al. Butyrate upregulates endogenous host defense peptides to enhance disease resistance in piglets via histone deacetylase inhibition. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:27070. doi: 10.1038/srep27070
Keywords: amino acids, feed additives, intestinal development, intestinal health, weaned piglets
Citation: Xiong X, Tan B, Song M, Ji P, Kim K, Yin Y and Liu Y (2019) Nutritional Intervention for the Intestinal Development and Health of Weaned Pigs. Front. Vet. Sci. 6:46. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00046
Received: 25 September 2018; Accepted: 04 February 2019;
Published: 21 February 2019.
Edited by:
Toshiro Arai, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, JapanReviewed by:
Kyung-Woo Lee, Konkuk University, South KoreaAlessandra Pelagalli, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
Copyright © 2019 Xiong, Tan, Song, Ji, Kim, Yin and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yanhong Liu, yahliu@ucdavis.edu